Normatividade, experiência e certeza em Wittgenstein
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Princípios (Natal. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/26497 |
Resumo: | In the Tractatus, Wittgenstein claims that the core issue of Philosophy concerns the very nature of the proposition. Later on, after rejecting this claim, Wittgenstein also reconsiders his view on logical necessity, which was implied by his earlier thoughts. From this revised standpoint, a new account on logical necessity is provided, by means of which it is acknowledged that some propositions gain the status of being necessary on a praxis base. Accordingly, this leads Wittgenstein to give a whole new flavour to the traditional synthetic-analytic distinction. Wittgenstein’s work reconcile the revisable character of logical certainty with the objective nature of the expression of experience, preserving the logical character of certainty in a context where necessity is characterized in terms of the absence of reasons. |
id |
UFRN-5_72c75604e5cb4d5ae9353a9501092cc7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/26497 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRN-5 |
network_name_str |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Normatividade, experiência e certeza em WittgensteinWittgenstein, Necessity, Experience, Certainty.WiitgensteinNecessityExperienceCertainty In the Tractatus, Wittgenstein claims that the core issue of Philosophy concerns the very nature of the proposition. Later on, after rejecting this claim, Wittgenstein also reconsiders his view on logical necessity, which was implied by his earlier thoughts. From this revised standpoint, a new account on logical necessity is provided, by means of which it is acknowledged that some propositions gain the status of being necessary on a praxis base. Accordingly, this leads Wittgenstein to give a whole new flavour to the traditional synthetic-analytic distinction. Wittgenstein’s work reconcile the revisable character of logical certainty with the objective nature of the expression of experience, preserving the logical character of certainty in a context where necessity is characterized in terms of the absence of reasons.No tempo do Tractatus, Wittgenstein compreendia ser a questão cardeal da filosofia a natureza da proposição. O abandono dessa questão torna possível pensar a necessidade lógica não mais por referências à natureza de determinadas proposições, mas com relação à função orientadora das práticas judicativas exercida por determinadas proposições. Isso conduz a obra de Wittgenstein a relativizar a distinção analítico/sintético fundamental ao logicismo. A questão é como a obra de Wittgenstein é capaz de conciliar o caráter revisável da necessidade lógica com a natureza objetiva da expressão da experiência e, além disso, preservar o caráter lógico da certeza num contexto em que a necessidade caracteriza-se pela ausência de fundamentos. EDUFRN2022-08-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/2649710.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n59ID26497Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 29 n. 59 (2022): Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); 111-1291983-21090104-869410.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n59reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/26497/15990Copyright (c) 2022 Wagner Teles de Oliveirahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTeles de Oliveira, Wagner2022-08-04T23:01:53Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/26497Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principiosPUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/oai||principios@cchla.ufrn.br1983-21090104-8694opendoar:2022-08-04T23:01:53Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Normatividade, experiência e certeza em Wittgenstein |
title |
Normatividade, experiência e certeza em Wittgenstein |
spellingShingle |
Normatividade, experiência e certeza em Wittgenstein Teles de Oliveira, Wagner Wittgenstein, Necessity, Experience, Certainty. Wiitgenstein Necessity Experience Certainty |
title_short |
Normatividade, experiência e certeza em Wittgenstein |
title_full |
Normatividade, experiência e certeza em Wittgenstein |
title_fullStr |
Normatividade, experiência e certeza em Wittgenstein |
title_full_unstemmed |
Normatividade, experiência e certeza em Wittgenstein |
title_sort |
Normatividade, experiência e certeza em Wittgenstein |
author |
Teles de Oliveira, Wagner |
author_facet |
Teles de Oliveira, Wagner |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Teles de Oliveira, Wagner |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Wittgenstein, Necessity, Experience, Certainty. Wiitgenstein Necessity Experience Certainty |
topic |
Wittgenstein, Necessity, Experience, Certainty. Wiitgenstein Necessity Experience Certainty |
description |
In the Tractatus, Wittgenstein claims that the core issue of Philosophy concerns the very nature of the proposition. Later on, after rejecting this claim, Wittgenstein also reconsiders his view on logical necessity, which was implied by his earlier thoughts. From this revised standpoint, a new account on logical necessity is provided, by means of which it is acknowledged that some propositions gain the status of being necessary on a praxis base. Accordingly, this leads Wittgenstein to give a whole new flavour to the traditional synthetic-analytic distinction. Wittgenstein’s work reconcile the revisable character of logical certainty with the objective nature of the expression of experience, preserving the logical character of certainty in a context where necessity is characterized in terms of the absence of reasons. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/26497 10.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n59ID26497 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/26497 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n59ID26497 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/26497/15990 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Wagner Teles de Oliveira http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Wagner Teles de Oliveira http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFRN |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFRN |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 29 n. 59 (2022): Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); 111-129 1983-2109 0104-8694 10.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n59 reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) instacron:UFRN |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
instacron_str |
UFRN |
institution |
UFRN |
reponame_str |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
collection |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||principios@cchla.ufrn.br |
_version_ |
1799769979662368768 |