FEELING RESPONSIBLE AND INTEGRATED: A CHALLENGE TO INTELLECTUALISM ABOUT AGENCY
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Princípios (Natal. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7511 |
Resumo: | Reflection is put at the forefront of rational agency (in the sense of acting for a reason) by what we will call here ‘the intellectualist tradition’. According to this tradition, there is a sort of qualitative distinction between actions which are the result of reflection and those which are simply motivated by pro-attitudes like desires. One long-standing problem with such qualitative distinction is concerned with the so many swift, quasi-automatic actions we perform in everyday life. How can these be accommodated within the intellectualist framework? In the context of these actions and of providing an answer to that question, our aim here is to highlight another problem with that qualitative distinction: one which is related to our natural feelings of responsibility for our actions. In the end, we shall suggest that only an account of rational agency that holds an “internal”, straightforward relation between desires and actions would be able to make sense of those feelings. |
id |
UFRN-5_a74a316314b77b7f82eae55e5c718fa4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/7511 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRN-5 |
network_name_str |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
FEELING RESPONSIBLE AND INTEGRATED: A CHALLENGE TO INTELLECTUALISM ABOUT AGENCYPractical rationalityIntellectualismAutomatic actionsPractical responsibilityReflection is put at the forefront of rational agency (in the sense of acting for a reason) by what we will call here ‘the intellectualist tradition’. According to this tradition, there is a sort of qualitative distinction between actions which are the result of reflection and those which are simply motivated by pro-attitudes like desires. One long-standing problem with such qualitative distinction is concerned with the so many swift, quasi-automatic actions we perform in everyday life. How can these be accommodated within the intellectualist framework? In the context of these actions and of providing an answer to that question, our aim here is to highlight another problem with that qualitative distinction: one which is related to our natural feelings of responsibility for our actions. In the end, we shall suggest that only an account of rational agency that holds an “internal”, straightforward relation between desires and actions would be able to make sense of those feelings.EDUFRN2015-07-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7511Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 20 n. 33 (2013): Princípios: revista de filosofia; 105-1221983-21090104-8694reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNenghttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7511/5582Copyright (c) 2013 Leonardo de Mello Ribeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Leonardo de Mello2016-12-16T17:05:02Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/7511Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principiosPUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/oai||principios@cchla.ufrn.br1983-21090104-8694opendoar:2016-12-16T17:05:02Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
FEELING RESPONSIBLE AND INTEGRATED: A CHALLENGE TO INTELLECTUALISM ABOUT AGENCY |
title |
FEELING RESPONSIBLE AND INTEGRATED: A CHALLENGE TO INTELLECTUALISM ABOUT AGENCY |
spellingShingle |
FEELING RESPONSIBLE AND INTEGRATED: A CHALLENGE TO INTELLECTUALISM ABOUT AGENCY Ribeiro, Leonardo de Mello Practical rationality Intellectualism Automatic actions Practical responsibility |
title_short |
FEELING RESPONSIBLE AND INTEGRATED: A CHALLENGE TO INTELLECTUALISM ABOUT AGENCY |
title_full |
FEELING RESPONSIBLE AND INTEGRATED: A CHALLENGE TO INTELLECTUALISM ABOUT AGENCY |
title_fullStr |
FEELING RESPONSIBLE AND INTEGRATED: A CHALLENGE TO INTELLECTUALISM ABOUT AGENCY |
title_full_unstemmed |
FEELING RESPONSIBLE AND INTEGRATED: A CHALLENGE TO INTELLECTUALISM ABOUT AGENCY |
title_sort |
FEELING RESPONSIBLE AND INTEGRATED: A CHALLENGE TO INTELLECTUALISM ABOUT AGENCY |
author |
Ribeiro, Leonardo de Mello |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, Leonardo de Mello |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Leonardo de Mello |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Practical rationality Intellectualism Automatic actions Practical responsibility |
topic |
Practical rationality Intellectualism Automatic actions Practical responsibility |
description |
Reflection is put at the forefront of rational agency (in the sense of acting for a reason) by what we will call here ‘the intellectualist tradition’. According to this tradition, there is a sort of qualitative distinction between actions which are the result of reflection and those which are simply motivated by pro-attitudes like desires. One long-standing problem with such qualitative distinction is concerned with the so many swift, quasi-automatic actions we perform in everyday life. How can these be accommodated within the intellectualist framework? In the context of these actions and of providing an answer to that question, our aim here is to highlight another problem with that qualitative distinction: one which is related to our natural feelings of responsibility for our actions. In the end, we shall suggest that only an account of rational agency that holds an “internal”, straightforward relation between desires and actions would be able to make sense of those feelings. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-07-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7511 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7511 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7511/5582 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 Leonardo de Mello Ribeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 Leonardo de Mello Ribeiro |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFRN |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFRN |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 20 n. 33 (2013): Princípios: revista de filosofia; 105-122 1983-2109 0104-8694 reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) instacron:UFRN |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
instacron_str |
UFRN |
institution |
UFRN |
reponame_str |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
collection |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||principios@cchla.ufrn.br |
_version_ |
1799769978291879936 |