Cosmopolitanism in Question: Habermas versus Schmitt

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cordeiro, Roan Costa
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Princípios (Natal. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/27145
Resumo: This paper aims to investigate the Habermasian confrontation with Immanuel Kant and Carl Schmitt about the foundations of a juridical and political cosmopolitan project. By analyzing Habermas’ paths between The Inclusion of the Other (1996) and On Europe’s Constitution (2011), it is investigated how such a confrontation occurs and what is its strategic role in configuring a juridical and political Postnational model. Thus, it should be noted that Habermas, who claims the Kantian legacy, must face the theoretical counterpoints raised by Carl Schmitt’s thought about the very political self-understanding of Modernity. Therefore, one should situate an axis of contemporary political cosmopolitanism, and Schmitt’s role played in the larger frame of political and philosophical debates of the present times.
id UFRN-5_cc603e48b9399bbababfad2d56329fe8
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/27145
network_acronym_str UFRN-5
network_name_str Princípios (Natal. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Cosmopolitanism in Question: Habermas versus SchmittO cosmopolitismo em questão: Habermas versus SchmittCosmopolitanismSovereigntyKantJürgen HabermasCarl SchmittCosmopolitismoSoberaniaKantJürgen HabermasCarl SchmittThis paper aims to investigate the Habermasian confrontation with Immanuel Kant and Carl Schmitt about the foundations of a juridical and political cosmopolitan project. By analyzing Habermas’ paths between The Inclusion of the Other (1996) and On Europe’s Constitution (2011), it is investigated how such a confrontation occurs and what is its strategic role in configuring a juridical and political Postnational model. Thus, it should be noted that Habermas, who claims the Kantian legacy, must face the theoretical counterpoints raised by Carl Schmitt’s thought about the very political self-understanding of Modernity. Therefore, one should situate an axis of contemporary political cosmopolitanism, and Schmitt’s role played in the larger frame of political and philosophical debates of the present times.Este artigo propõe investigar o confronto de Jürgen Habermas com Immanuel Kant e Carl Schmitt sobre os fundamentos de um projeto jurídico-político cosmopolita. Para isso, percorrendo o trajeto de Habermas entre A inclusão do outro (1996) e Sobre a constituição da Europa (2011), explora-se como ocorre esse enfrentamento e qual seu papel estratégico na conformação de um modelo jurídico-político pós-nacional. Diante disso, nota-se que Habermas, ao reivindicar o legado kantiano, tem de enfrentar os contrapontos teóricos levantados pelo pensamento de Carl Schmitt quanto à autocompreensão política da modernidade. Assim, pode-se situar um eixo de fundamentação do projeto político cosmopolita e também o papel desempenhado por Schmitt no quadro mais amplo dos debates políticos e filosóficos do presente.EDUFRN2022-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/2714510.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n60ID27145Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 29 n. 60 (2022): Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); 235-2531983-21090104-869410.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n60reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/27145/16261Copyright (c) 2022 Roan Costa Cordeirohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCordeiro, Roan Costa2022-12-01T12:18:07Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/27145Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principiosPUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/oai||principios@cchla.ufrn.br1983-21090104-8694opendoar:2022-12-01T12:18:07Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cosmopolitanism in Question: Habermas versus Schmitt
O cosmopolitismo em questão: Habermas versus Schmitt
title Cosmopolitanism in Question: Habermas versus Schmitt
spellingShingle Cosmopolitanism in Question: Habermas versus Schmitt
Cordeiro, Roan Costa
Cosmopolitanism
Sovereignty
Kant
Jürgen Habermas
Carl Schmitt
Cosmopolitismo
Soberania
Kant
Jürgen Habermas
Carl Schmitt
title_short Cosmopolitanism in Question: Habermas versus Schmitt
title_full Cosmopolitanism in Question: Habermas versus Schmitt
title_fullStr Cosmopolitanism in Question: Habermas versus Schmitt
title_full_unstemmed Cosmopolitanism in Question: Habermas versus Schmitt
title_sort Cosmopolitanism in Question: Habermas versus Schmitt
author Cordeiro, Roan Costa
author_facet Cordeiro, Roan Costa
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cordeiro, Roan Costa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cosmopolitanism
Sovereignty
Kant
Jürgen Habermas
Carl Schmitt
Cosmopolitismo
Soberania
Kant
Jürgen Habermas
Carl Schmitt
topic Cosmopolitanism
Sovereignty
Kant
Jürgen Habermas
Carl Schmitt
Cosmopolitismo
Soberania
Kant
Jürgen Habermas
Carl Schmitt
description This paper aims to investigate the Habermasian confrontation with Immanuel Kant and Carl Schmitt about the foundations of a juridical and political cosmopolitan project. By analyzing Habermas’ paths between The Inclusion of the Other (1996) and On Europe’s Constitution (2011), it is investigated how such a confrontation occurs and what is its strategic role in configuring a juridical and political Postnational model. Thus, it should be noted that Habermas, who claims the Kantian legacy, must face the theoretical counterpoints raised by Carl Schmitt’s thought about the very political self-understanding of Modernity. Therefore, one should situate an axis of contemporary political cosmopolitanism, and Schmitt’s role played in the larger frame of political and philosophical debates of the present times.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/27145
10.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n60ID27145
url https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/27145
identifier_str_mv 10.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n60ID27145
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/27145/16261
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Roan Costa Cordeiro
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Roan Costa Cordeiro
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFRN
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFRN
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 29 n. 60 (2022): Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); 235-253
1983-2109
0104-8694
10.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n60
reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron:UFRN
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron_str UFRN
institution UFRN
reponame_str Princípios (Natal. Online)
collection Princípios (Natal. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||principios@cchla.ufrn.br
_version_ 1799769979671805952

Registros relacionados