Discourse on new technologies in the field of CALL: the construction of the “traditional” and the “new”

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gasparini, Edmundo
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista odisséia
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/19675
Resumo: Based upon Michel Pêcheux’s discourse analysis, we reflected on the CALL (Computer Assisted Language Learning) field by analyzing scientific articles which discuss new technologies in foreign language teaching and learning. Our aim was to investigate the discursive construction of the “traditional” and the “new.” The analysis carried out indicated that in the field of CALL the “traditional” is constructed in contrast with the “new,” as a discouraging space in which teachers control the lessons, and collaboration, interaction and autonomy are not fostered among learners. The dichotomy “traditional x new” appears, then, as pure ideological evidence which idealizes the “new” to the detriment of the “traditional.”    
id UFRN-7_4ec1da7371b52c5d728f0594e8b11ce1
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/19675
network_acronym_str UFRN-7
network_name_str Revista odisséia
repository_id_str
spelling Discourse on new technologies in the field of CALL: the construction of the “traditional” and the “new” O discurso sobre as novas tecnologias no campo CALL: a construção do “tradicional” e do “novo”CALLNew technologiesDiscourseIdeologyCALLNovas tecnologiasDiscursoIdeologiaBased upon Michel Pêcheux’s discourse analysis, we reflected on the CALL (Computer Assisted Language Learning) field by analyzing scientific articles which discuss new technologies in foreign language teaching and learning. Our aim was to investigate the discursive construction of the “traditional” and the “new.” The analysis carried out indicated that in the field of CALL the “traditional” is constructed in contrast with the “new,” as a discouraging space in which teachers control the lessons, and collaboration, interaction and autonomy are not fostered among learners. The dichotomy “traditional x new” appears, then, as pure ideological evidence which idealizes the “new” to the detriment of the “traditional.”              Com base na Análise do Discurso elaborada por Michel Pêcheux, tomamos como objeto de reflexão o campo CALL (Computer Assisted Language Learning-Aprendizagem de Línguas Mediada por Computadores). Foram analisados artigos científicos que discutem as novas tecnologias no ensino e na aprendizagem de línguas estrangeiras, com o objetivo de abordar a construção discursiva do “tradicional” e do “novo”. A análise realizada indicou que, no âmbito do CALL, o “tradicional” é construído, em oposição ao “novo”, como espaço desestimulante onde o professor controla a dinâmica da aula, em que não se fomenta colaboração, interação ou autonomia entre os alunos. A dicotomia “tradicional x novo” desponta, portanto, como efeito ideológico de evidência, idealizando o “novo” em detrimento do “tradicional”.  UFRN2020-04-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/1967510.21680/1983-2435.2020v5n1ID19675Odisseia; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020); p. 60 - 83Revue Odisseia; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020); p. 60 - 83Revista Odisseia; v. 5 n. 1 (2020); p. 60 - 831983-243510.21680/1983-2435.2020v5n1reponame:Revista odisséiainstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/19675/12637Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Odisseiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGasparini, Edmundo2020-05-04T10:58:13Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/19675Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/oai||revistaodisseia2016@gmail.com1983-24351983-2435opendoar:2020-05-04T10:58:13Revista odisséia - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Discourse on new technologies in the field of CALL: the construction of the “traditional” and the “new”
O discurso sobre as novas tecnologias no campo CALL: a construção do “tradicional” e do “novo”
title Discourse on new technologies in the field of CALL: the construction of the “traditional” and the “new”
spellingShingle Discourse on new technologies in the field of CALL: the construction of the “traditional” and the “new”
Gasparini, Edmundo
CALL
New technologies
Discourse
Ideology
CALL
Novas tecnologias
Discurso
Ideologia
title_short Discourse on new technologies in the field of CALL: the construction of the “traditional” and the “new”
title_full Discourse on new technologies in the field of CALL: the construction of the “traditional” and the “new”
title_fullStr Discourse on new technologies in the field of CALL: the construction of the “traditional” and the “new”
title_full_unstemmed Discourse on new technologies in the field of CALL: the construction of the “traditional” and the “new”
title_sort Discourse on new technologies in the field of CALL: the construction of the “traditional” and the “new”
author Gasparini, Edmundo
author_facet Gasparini, Edmundo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gasparini, Edmundo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv CALL
New technologies
Discourse
Ideology
CALL
Novas tecnologias
Discurso
Ideologia
topic CALL
New technologies
Discourse
Ideology
CALL
Novas tecnologias
Discurso
Ideologia
description Based upon Michel Pêcheux’s discourse analysis, we reflected on the CALL (Computer Assisted Language Learning) field by analyzing scientific articles which discuss new technologies in foreign language teaching and learning. Our aim was to investigate the discursive construction of the “traditional” and the “new.” The analysis carried out indicated that in the field of CALL the “traditional” is constructed in contrast with the “new,” as a discouraging space in which teachers control the lessons, and collaboration, interaction and autonomy are not fostered among learners. The dichotomy “traditional x new” appears, then, as pure ideological evidence which idealizes the “new” to the detriment of the “traditional.”    
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/19675
10.21680/1983-2435.2020v5n1ID19675
url https://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/19675
identifier_str_mv 10.21680/1983-2435.2020v5n1ID19675
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/19675/12637
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Odisseia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Odisseia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRN
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRN
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Odisseia; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020); p. 60 - 83
Revue Odisseia; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020); p. 60 - 83
Revista Odisseia; v. 5 n. 1 (2020); p. 60 - 83
1983-2435
10.21680/1983-2435.2020v5n1
reponame:Revista odisséia
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron:UFRN
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron_str UFRN
institution UFRN
reponame_str Revista odisséia
collection Revista odisséia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista odisséia - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaodisseia2016@gmail.com
_version_ 1809282348992167936

Registros relacionados