TEORIA MARXISTA E BUEN VIVIR: MARXIST THEORY AND BUEN VIVIR
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Inter-legere |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/15726 |
Resumo: | The article aims to analyze the similarities and the differences between two critical conceptions about the Capitalism: the Marxist Theory and the Buen Vivir, more specifically considering the proposals to overcome this system and the conditions to materialize them. The similarities became clear with opposition to a system characterized by the exploitation of the men by the men and of the nature by the men, by the large production of commodities and by the loss of the meaning of an alienated work. Both perspectives propose changes that enable the construction of a less unequal society. Nevertheless, they are based in different understandings about the conditions to materialize it. In the Marxist Theory, based in the historical materialism, the Communism would be practicable only when the relations of production that characterize the capitalism configure an obstacle to the development of the productive forces and when the exploitation of the proletariat reach the limit. In Buen Vivir, in its turn, the social transformation is not conditioned by the class struggle and the exploitation, but the ideas of complementary and equilibrium; and the conscious is not conceived as subordinate to the material conditions for the existence, inasmuch as the material and symbolic plane are not seen as separated. |
id |
UFRN-9_4d61e4d2db4d0d8b3b553a3baca5bc7d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/15726 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRN-9 |
network_name_str |
Inter-legere |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
TEORIA MARXISTA E BUEN VIVIR: MARXIST THEORY AND BUEN VIVIRThe article aims to analyze the similarities and the differences between two critical conceptions about the Capitalism: the Marxist Theory and the Buen Vivir, more specifically considering the proposals to overcome this system and the conditions to materialize them. The similarities became clear with opposition to a system characterized by the exploitation of the men by the men and of the nature by the men, by the large production of commodities and by the loss of the meaning of an alienated work. Both perspectives propose changes that enable the construction of a less unequal society. Nevertheless, they are based in different understandings about the conditions to materialize it. In the Marxist Theory, based in the historical materialism, the Communism would be practicable only when the relations of production that characterize the capitalism configure an obstacle to the development of the productive forces and when the exploitation of the proletariat reach the limit. In Buen Vivir, in its turn, the social transformation is not conditioned by the class struggle and the exploitation, but the ideas of complementary and equilibrium; and the conscious is not conceived as subordinate to the material conditions for the existence, inasmuch as the material and symbolic plane are not seen as separated.O objetivo do artigo é analisar as similitudes e as divergências entre duas concepções críticas ao Capitalismo: a Teoria Marxista e o Buen Vivir, mais especificamente no que diz respeito às propostas de superação desse sistema e às condições para que elas se concretizem. As semelhanças evidenciam-se na oposição a um sistema caracterizado pela exploração do homem pelo homem e do homem pela natureza, pela produção exacerbada de mercadorias e pela ausência de sentido de um trabalho alienado. Ambas perspectivas propõem uma mudança que propicie a construção de uma sociedade menos desigual. Partem, entretanto, de entendimentos diferentes das condições para que essa mudança se concretize. Na teoria marxista, em que se tem por base o materialismo histórico, o Comunismo só seria viável quando as relações de produção características do Capitalismo passassem a se constituir em um obstáculo ao desenvolvimento das forças produtivas e a exploração do proletariado pela burguesia atingisse o seu limite. Já no caso do Buen Vivir, a transformação social não teria como pressuposto o antagonismo de classe e a exploração, mas a noção de complementariedade e equilíbrio; e a consciência não seria concebida como subordinada às condições materiais de existência, sendo o plano material e o plano simbólico vistos como parte de um todo.UFRN2018-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/1572610.21680/1982-1662.2018v1n23ID15726Revista Inter-Legere; v. 1 n. 23 (2018): EDUCAÇÃO, ARTES E TECNOLOGIA; 131-1481982-166210.21680/1982-1662.2018v1n23reponame:Inter-legereinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/15726/10898Copyright (c) 2018 Lorrany Rodrigues do Nascimentoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues do Nascimento, Lorrany2021-11-30T19:32:19Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/15726Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegerePUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/oai||interlegere@cchla.ufrn.br||analaudelina@uol.com.br1982-16621982-1662opendoar:2021-11-30T19:32:19Inter-legere - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
TEORIA MARXISTA E BUEN VIVIR: MARXIST THEORY AND BUEN VIVIR |
title |
TEORIA MARXISTA E BUEN VIVIR: MARXIST THEORY AND BUEN VIVIR |
spellingShingle |
TEORIA MARXISTA E BUEN VIVIR: MARXIST THEORY AND BUEN VIVIR Rodrigues do Nascimento, Lorrany |
title_short |
TEORIA MARXISTA E BUEN VIVIR: MARXIST THEORY AND BUEN VIVIR |
title_full |
TEORIA MARXISTA E BUEN VIVIR: MARXIST THEORY AND BUEN VIVIR |
title_fullStr |
TEORIA MARXISTA E BUEN VIVIR: MARXIST THEORY AND BUEN VIVIR |
title_full_unstemmed |
TEORIA MARXISTA E BUEN VIVIR: MARXIST THEORY AND BUEN VIVIR |
title_sort |
TEORIA MARXISTA E BUEN VIVIR: MARXIST THEORY AND BUEN VIVIR |
author |
Rodrigues do Nascimento, Lorrany |
author_facet |
Rodrigues do Nascimento, Lorrany |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues do Nascimento, Lorrany |
description |
The article aims to analyze the similarities and the differences between two critical conceptions about the Capitalism: the Marxist Theory and the Buen Vivir, more specifically considering the proposals to overcome this system and the conditions to materialize them. The similarities became clear with opposition to a system characterized by the exploitation of the men by the men and of the nature by the men, by the large production of commodities and by the loss of the meaning of an alienated work. Both perspectives propose changes that enable the construction of a less unequal society. Nevertheless, they are based in different understandings about the conditions to materialize it. In the Marxist Theory, based in the historical materialism, the Communism would be practicable only when the relations of production that characterize the capitalism configure an obstacle to the development of the productive forces and when the exploitation of the proletariat reach the limit. In Buen Vivir, in its turn, the social transformation is not conditioned by the class struggle and the exploitation, but the ideas of complementary and equilibrium; and the conscious is not conceived as subordinate to the material conditions for the existence, inasmuch as the material and symbolic plane are not seen as separated. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/15726 10.21680/1982-1662.2018v1n23ID15726 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/15726 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21680/1982-1662.2018v1n23ID15726 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/15726/10898 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Lorrany Rodrigues do Nascimento info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Lorrany Rodrigues do Nascimento |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRN |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRN |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Inter-Legere; v. 1 n. 23 (2018): EDUCAÇÃO, ARTES E TECNOLOGIA; 131-148 1982-1662 10.21680/1982-1662.2018v1n23 reponame:Inter-legere instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) instacron:UFRN |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
instacron_str |
UFRN |
institution |
UFRN |
reponame_str |
Inter-legere |
collection |
Inter-legere |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Inter-legere - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||interlegere@cchla.ufrn.br||analaudelina@uol.com.br |
_version_ |
1798043139647209472 |