SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Inter-legere |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/21470 |
Resumo: | This theoretical essay is part of an effort to understand the thinking of one of the most important authors of the social sciences in the contemporary times: Bruno Latour. With its hermetic, abstract and philosophical writing, this author offers us a totally innovative lens in the way of thinking about how scientific knowledge is constructed by launching the following question: Why are the Social Sciences very anthropocentric? The thesis proposed by Latour offers us a vision in which things and nonhumans must be considered in scientific analysis, since they are also part of the social world. Aiming to end the subject-object opposition, he proposes as an solution, the attempt to overcome the abyss between men and things, human beings and nonhumans, society and nature and between social sciences and natural sciences, through a principle of symmetry, which seeks to explain nature and society with equal treatment, giving importance to the hybrids and reconciling the dichotomous separation between subjects and objects that in turn, start to present themselves to social theory in a different way and that undoubtedly shakes the foundations of the modern anthropology . Key words: Actor-Network Theory. Symmetric Anthropology. Human and Nonhuman. Bruno Latour. |
id |
UFRN-9_e8a68984df0a12da0a066c51dac4d2f0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/21470 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRN-9 |
network_name_str |
Inter-legere |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDEThis theoretical essay is part of an effort to understand the thinking of one of the most important authors of the social sciences in the contemporary times: Bruno Latour. With its hermetic, abstract and philosophical writing, this author offers us a totally innovative lens in the way of thinking about how scientific knowledge is constructed by launching the following question: Why are the Social Sciences very anthropocentric? The thesis proposed by Latour offers us a vision in which things and nonhumans must be considered in scientific analysis, since they are also part of the social world. Aiming to end the subject-object opposition, he proposes as an solution, the attempt to overcome the abyss between men and things, human beings and nonhumans, society and nature and between social sciences and natural sciences, through a principle of symmetry, which seeks to explain nature and society with equal treatment, giving importance to the hybrids and reconciling the dichotomous separation between subjects and objects that in turn, start to present themselves to social theory in a different way and that undoubtedly shakes the foundations of the modern anthropology . Key words: Actor-Network Theory. Symmetric Anthropology. Human and Nonhuman. Bruno Latour. Este artigo faz parte de um esforço no sentido de compreender o pensamento de um dos autores mais importantes das Ciências Sociais na contemporaneidade: Bruno Latour. Com sua escrita hermética, abstrata, filosófica e por vezes, difícil de compreender, este autor nos oferece uma lente totalmente inovadora no modo de se pensar sobre a forma como o conhecimento científico é construído, nos lançando o seguinte questionamento: Por que as Ciências Sociais são tão antropocêntricas? A tese proposta por Latour nos oferece uma visão, na qual as coisas e os não-humanos devem ser considerados nas análises científicas, pois também fazem parte do mundo social. Visando acabar com a oposição sujeito-objeto, ele propõe como saída, a tentativa de superar o abismo entre homens e coisas, seres humanos e não humanos, sociedade e natureza e entre ciências humanas e ciências naturais, através de um princípio de simetria, que busca explicar natureza e sociedade com igualdade de tratamento, dando importância aos híbridos e reconciliando a separação dicotômica entre sujeitos e objetos que por sua vez, passam a se apresentar à teoria social de uma maneira diferente e que sem dúvidas, balança as bases da antropologia moderna. Palavras-chave: Teoria do Ator-Rede. Antropologia Simétrica. Humanos e Não Humanos. Bruno Latour.UFRN2021-04-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/2147010.21680/1982-1662.2021v4n31ID21470Revista Inter-Legere; v. 4 n. 31 (2021): INTERDISCIPLINARIDADE E POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS; c214701982-166210.21680/1982-1662.2021v4n31reponame:Inter-legereinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/21470/14157Copyright (c) 2021 Renata Milanêsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMilanês, Renata2021-09-08T14:53:14Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/21470Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegerePUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/oai||interlegere@cchla.ufrn.br||analaudelina@uol.com.br1982-16621982-1662opendoar:2021-09-08T14:53:14Inter-legere - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE |
title |
SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE |
spellingShingle |
SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE Milanês, Renata |
title_short |
SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE |
title_full |
SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE |
title_fullStr |
SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE |
title_full_unstemmed |
SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE |
title_sort |
SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE |
author |
Milanês, Renata |
author_facet |
Milanês, Renata |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Milanês, Renata |
description |
This theoretical essay is part of an effort to understand the thinking of one of the most important authors of the social sciences in the contemporary times: Bruno Latour. With its hermetic, abstract and philosophical writing, this author offers us a totally innovative lens in the way of thinking about how scientific knowledge is constructed by launching the following question: Why are the Social Sciences very anthropocentric? The thesis proposed by Latour offers us a vision in which things and nonhumans must be considered in scientific analysis, since they are also part of the social world. Aiming to end the subject-object opposition, he proposes as an solution, the attempt to overcome the abyss between men and things, human beings and nonhumans, society and nature and between social sciences and natural sciences, through a principle of symmetry, which seeks to explain nature and society with equal treatment, giving importance to the hybrids and reconciling the dichotomous separation between subjects and objects that in turn, start to present themselves to social theory in a different way and that undoubtedly shakes the foundations of the modern anthropology . Key words: Actor-Network Theory. Symmetric Anthropology. Human and Nonhuman. Bruno Latour. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/21470 10.21680/1982-1662.2021v4n31ID21470 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/21470 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21680/1982-1662.2021v4n31ID21470 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/21470/14157 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Renata Milanês info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Renata Milanês |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRN |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRN |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Inter-Legere; v. 4 n. 31 (2021): INTERDISCIPLINARIDADE E POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS; c21470 1982-1662 10.21680/1982-1662.2021v4n31 reponame:Inter-legere instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) instacron:UFRN |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
instacron_str |
UFRN |
institution |
UFRN |
reponame_str |
Inter-legere |
collection |
Inter-legere |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Inter-legere - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||interlegere@cchla.ufrn.br||analaudelina@uol.com.br |
_version_ |
1798043140026793984 |