SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Milanês, Renata
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Inter-legere
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/21470
Resumo: This theoretical essay is part of an effort to understand the thinking of one of the most important authors of the social sciences in the contemporary times: Bruno Latour. With its hermetic, abstract and philosophical writing, this author offers us a totally innovative lens in the way of thinking about how scientific knowledge is constructed by launching the following question: Why are the Social Sciences very anthropocentric? The thesis proposed by Latour offers us a vision in which things and nonhumans must be considered in scientific analysis, since they are also part of the social world. Aiming to end the subject-object opposition, he proposes as an solution, the attempt to overcome the abyss between men and things, human beings and nonhumans, society and nature and between social sciences and natural sciences, through a principle of symmetry, which seeks to explain nature and society with equal treatment, giving importance to the hybrids and reconciling the dichotomous separation between subjects and objects that in turn, start to present themselves to social theory in a different way and that undoubtedly shakes the foundations of the modern anthropology . Key words: Actor-Network Theory. Symmetric Anthropology. Human and Nonhuman. Bruno Latour.  
id UFRN-9_e8a68984df0a12da0a066c51dac4d2f0
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/21470
network_acronym_str UFRN-9
network_name_str Inter-legere
repository_id_str
spelling SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDEThis theoretical essay is part of an effort to understand the thinking of one of the most important authors of the social sciences in the contemporary times: Bruno Latour. With its hermetic, abstract and philosophical writing, this author offers us a totally innovative lens in the way of thinking about how scientific knowledge is constructed by launching the following question: Why are the Social Sciences very anthropocentric? The thesis proposed by Latour offers us a vision in which things and nonhumans must be considered in scientific analysis, since they are also part of the social world. Aiming to end the subject-object opposition, he proposes as an solution, the attempt to overcome the abyss between men and things, human beings and nonhumans, society and nature and between social sciences and natural sciences, through a principle of symmetry, which seeks to explain nature and society with equal treatment, giving importance to the hybrids and reconciling the dichotomous separation between subjects and objects that in turn, start to present themselves to social theory in a different way and that undoubtedly shakes the foundations of the modern anthropology . Key words: Actor-Network Theory. Symmetric Anthropology. Human and Nonhuman. Bruno Latour.  Este artigo faz parte de um esforço no sentido de compreender o pensamento de um dos autores mais importantes das Ciências Sociais na contemporaneidade: Bruno Latour. Com sua escrita hermética, abstrata, filosófica e por vezes, difícil de compreender, este autor nos oferece uma lente totalmente inovadora no modo de se pensar sobre a forma como o conhecimento científico é construído, nos lançando o seguinte questionamento: Por que as Ciências Sociais são tão antropocêntricas? A tese proposta por Latour nos oferece uma visão, na qual as coisas e os não-humanos devem ser considerados nas análises científicas, pois também fazem parte do mundo social. Visando acabar com a oposição sujeito-objeto, ele propõe como saída, a tentativa de superar o abismo entre homens e coisas, seres humanos e não humanos, sociedade e natureza e entre ciências humanas e ciências naturais, através de um princípio de simetria, que busca explicar natureza e sociedade com igualdade de tratamento, dando importância aos híbridos e reconciliando a separação dicotômica entre sujeitos e objetos que por sua vez, passam a se apresentar à teoria social de uma maneira diferente e que sem dúvidas,  balança as bases da antropologia moderna. Palavras-chave: Teoria do Ator-Rede. Antropologia Simétrica. Humanos e Não Humanos. Bruno Latour.UFRN2021-04-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/2147010.21680/1982-1662.2021v4n31ID21470Revista Inter-Legere; v. 4 n. 31 (2021): INTERDISCIPLINARIDADE E POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS; c214701982-166210.21680/1982-1662.2021v4n31reponame:Inter-legereinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/21470/14157Copyright (c) 2021 Renata Milanêsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMilanês, Renata2021-09-08T14:53:14Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/21470Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegerePUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/oai||interlegere@cchla.ufrn.br||analaudelina@uol.com.br1982-16621982-1662opendoar:2021-09-08T14:53:14Inter-legere - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE
title SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE
spellingShingle SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE
Milanês, Renata
title_short SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE
title_full SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE
title_fullStr SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE
title_full_unstemmed SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE
title_sort SEGUINDO AS REDES DE BRUNO LATOUR: UM ENSAIO SOBRE A ANTROPOLOGIA SIMÉTRICA E A TEORIA DO ATOR-REDE
author Milanês, Renata
author_facet Milanês, Renata
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Milanês, Renata
description This theoretical essay is part of an effort to understand the thinking of one of the most important authors of the social sciences in the contemporary times: Bruno Latour. With its hermetic, abstract and philosophical writing, this author offers us a totally innovative lens in the way of thinking about how scientific knowledge is constructed by launching the following question: Why are the Social Sciences very anthropocentric? The thesis proposed by Latour offers us a vision in which things and nonhumans must be considered in scientific analysis, since they are also part of the social world. Aiming to end the subject-object opposition, he proposes as an solution, the attempt to overcome the abyss between men and things, human beings and nonhumans, society and nature and between social sciences and natural sciences, through a principle of symmetry, which seeks to explain nature and society with equal treatment, giving importance to the hybrids and reconciling the dichotomous separation between subjects and objects that in turn, start to present themselves to social theory in a different way and that undoubtedly shakes the foundations of the modern anthropology . Key words: Actor-Network Theory. Symmetric Anthropology. Human and Nonhuman. Bruno Latour.  
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/21470
10.21680/1982-1662.2021v4n31ID21470
url https://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/21470
identifier_str_mv 10.21680/1982-1662.2021v4n31ID21470
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufrn.br/interlegere/article/view/21470/14157
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Renata Milanês
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Renata Milanês
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRN
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRN
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Inter-Legere; v. 4 n. 31 (2021): INTERDISCIPLINARIDADE E POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS; c21470
1982-1662
10.21680/1982-1662.2021v4n31
reponame:Inter-legere
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron:UFRN
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron_str UFRN
institution UFRN
reponame_str Inter-legere
collection Inter-legere
repository.name.fl_str_mv Inter-legere - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||interlegere@cchla.ufrn.br||analaudelina@uol.com.br
_version_ 1798043140026793984