Comparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substrates
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRN |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/21750 |
Resumo: | INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substrates. METHODS: Cell culture plates containing growth medium and E. faecalis (ATCC 29212) were used to grow biofilm on bovine dentin, gutta-percha, hydroxyapatite, or bovine bone. Substrates were incubated at 37°C for 14 or 21 days, and the medium was changed every 48 hours. After the growth induction periods, specimens (n = 5 per group and per induction period) were stained by using Live/Dead, and the images were analyzed under a confocal microscope. The total biovolume (μm(3)), live bacteria biovolume (μm(3)), and substrate coverage (%) were quantified by using the BioImage_L software. Results obtained were analyzed by nonparametric tests (P = .05). RESULTS: Biofilm formation was observed in all groups. Gutta-percha had the lowest total biovolume at 14 days (P < .05) and hydroxyapatite the highest at 21 days (P < .05). No significant difference was observed in green biovolume at 14 days. At 21 days, however, hydroxyapatite had the highest volume (P < .05). The percentages of coverage were similar among all substrates at 21 days (P > .05), but at 14 days, bovine bone presented the highest coverage (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: E. faecalis was capable of forming biofilm on all substrates during both growth periods; hydroxyapatite presented the highest rates of biofilm formation. The type of substrate influenced the biofilm characteristics, according to the parameters evaluated. |
id |
UFRN_79a5d18a19a5a0861785567a0eeb9518 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/21750 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRN |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRN |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane MariaFaria Júnior, Norberto Batista deDuarte, Marco Antonio HungaroOrdinola-Zapata, RonaldTanomaru-Filho, Mário2017-01-26T12:13:32Z2017-01-26T12:13:32Z2013GUERREIRO-TANOMARU, Juliane Maria et al. Comparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substrates. Journal of Endodontics , v. 39, n. 3, p. 346-350, 2013.https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/21750engBiofilmConfocal microscopyEnterococcus faecalisComparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substratesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleINTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substrates. METHODS: Cell culture plates containing growth medium and E. faecalis (ATCC 29212) were used to grow biofilm on bovine dentin, gutta-percha, hydroxyapatite, or bovine bone. Substrates were incubated at 37°C for 14 or 21 days, and the medium was changed every 48 hours. After the growth induction periods, specimens (n = 5 per group and per induction period) were stained by using Live/Dead, and the images were analyzed under a confocal microscope. The total biovolume (μm(3)), live bacteria biovolume (μm(3)), and substrate coverage (%) were quantified by using the BioImage_L software. Results obtained were analyzed by nonparametric tests (P = .05). RESULTS: Biofilm formation was observed in all groups. Gutta-percha had the lowest total biovolume at 14 days (P < .05) and hydroxyapatite the highest at 21 days (P < .05). No significant difference was observed in green biovolume at 14 days. At 21 days, however, hydroxyapatite had the highest volume (P < .05). The percentages of coverage were similar among all substrates at 21 days (P > .05), but at 14 days, bovine bone presented the highest coverage (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: E. faecalis was capable of forming biofilm on all substrates during both growth periods; hydroxyapatite presented the highest rates of biofilm formation. The type of substrate influenced the biofilm characteristics, according to the parameters evaluated.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRNinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNORIGINALComparativeAnalysisEnterococcus_GuerreiroTanomaru_2013.pdfComparativeAnalysisEnterococcus_GuerreiroTanomaru_2013.pdfhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23402505application/pdf905102https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/21750/1/ComparativeAnalysisEnterococcus_GuerreiroTanomaru_2013.pdf36acfacbd94f579b0449b0c3c0195a5fMD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81563https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/21750/2/license.txt2fca3d993fd069474a9dfb5156c39499MD52TEXTComparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm_2013.pdf.txtComparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm_2013.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain30059https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/21750/5/Comparative%20analysis%20of%20Enterococcus%20faecalis%20biofilm_2013.pdf.txt0ab6661f72dc87bd2f75580ef8cd36edMD55THUMBNAILComparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm_2013.pdf.jpgComparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm_2013.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4880https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/21750/6/Comparative%20analysis%20of%20Enterococcus%20faecalis%20biofilm_2013.pdf.jpgbbeb8142f171bcb454986c8c039a25c0MD56123456789/217502021-12-21 14:12:52.008oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br: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ório de PublicaçõesPUBhttp://repositorio.ufrn.br/oai/opendoar:2021-12-21T17:12:52Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Comparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substrates |
title |
Comparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substrates |
spellingShingle |
Comparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substrates Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria Biofilm Confocal microscopy Enterococcus faecalis |
title_short |
Comparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substrates |
title_full |
Comparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substrates |
title_fullStr |
Comparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substrates |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substrates |
title_sort |
Comparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substrates |
author |
Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria |
author_facet |
Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria Faria Júnior, Norberto Batista de Duarte, Marco Antonio Hungaro Ordinola-Zapata, Ronald Tanomaru-Filho, Mário |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Faria Júnior, Norberto Batista de Duarte, Marco Antonio Hungaro Ordinola-Zapata, Ronald Tanomaru-Filho, Mário |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria Faria Júnior, Norberto Batista de Duarte, Marco Antonio Hungaro Ordinola-Zapata, Ronald Tanomaru-Filho, Mário |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Biofilm Confocal microscopy Enterococcus faecalis |
topic |
Biofilm Confocal microscopy Enterococcus faecalis |
description |
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substrates. METHODS: Cell culture plates containing growth medium and E. faecalis (ATCC 29212) were used to grow biofilm on bovine dentin, gutta-percha, hydroxyapatite, or bovine bone. Substrates were incubated at 37°C for 14 or 21 days, and the medium was changed every 48 hours. After the growth induction periods, specimens (n = 5 per group and per induction period) were stained by using Live/Dead, and the images were analyzed under a confocal microscope. The total biovolume (μm(3)), live bacteria biovolume (μm(3)), and substrate coverage (%) were quantified by using the BioImage_L software. Results obtained were analyzed by nonparametric tests (P = .05). RESULTS: Biofilm formation was observed in all groups. Gutta-percha had the lowest total biovolume at 14 days (P < .05) and hydroxyapatite the highest at 21 days (P < .05). No significant difference was observed in green biovolume at 14 days. At 21 days, however, hydroxyapatite had the highest volume (P < .05). The percentages of coverage were similar among all substrates at 21 days (P > .05), but at 14 days, bovine bone presented the highest coverage (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: E. faecalis was capable of forming biofilm on all substrates during both growth periods; hydroxyapatite presented the highest rates of biofilm formation. The type of substrate influenced the biofilm characteristics, according to the parameters evaluated. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2013 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-26T12:13:32Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-26T12:13:32Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
GUERREIRO-TANOMARU, Juliane Maria et al. Comparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substrates. Journal of Endodontics , v. 39, n. 3, p. 346-350, 2013. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/21750 |
identifier_str_mv |
GUERREIRO-TANOMARU, Juliane Maria et al. Comparative analysis of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation on different substrates. Journal of Endodontics , v. 39, n. 3, p. 346-350, 2013. |
url |
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/21750 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) instacron:UFRN |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
instacron_str |
UFRN |
institution |
UFRN |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRN |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRN |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/21750/1/ComparativeAnalysisEnterococcus_GuerreiroTanomaru_2013.pdf https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/21750/2/license.txt https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/21750/5/Comparative%20analysis%20of%20Enterococcus%20faecalis%20biofilm_2013.pdf.txt https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/21750/6/Comparative%20analysis%20of%20Enterococcus%20faecalis%20biofilm_2013.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
36acfacbd94f579b0449b0c3c0195a5f 2fca3d993fd069474a9dfb5156c39499 0ab6661f72dc87bd2f75580ef8cd36ed bbeb8142f171bcb454986c8c039a25c0 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1814832793228673024 |