Placebo use and outcome quality: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRN |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/55329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000022915 |
Resumo: | Background: The Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship, research outcome and quality has been already evaluated for clinical trials in order to analyze if this kind of sponsorship affects the results of clinical trials. In this sense, this study has the aim to investigate whether placebo use allows positive outcomes regarding efficacy and safety compared to synthetic medicines. Methods: We designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review for methodology data. We will only randomized clinical trials that use placebo as comparator. The main outcome will be the evaluation of placebo use regarding the tendency for positive results (efficacy and security) when comparing to synthetic medicines. PubMed, Cochrane, LILACS (BVS), Web of Science, Scopus, and Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE) databases will be searched. Gray literature will be identified through the databases Proquest (Dissertation and Theses), OpenGrey and Google Scholar. Two review authors will independently assess trial quality and will extract data in accordance with standard Cochrane methodology. If necessary, we will also contact authors for additional information. The Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool will be used. If feasible, it means homogenous data, we will conduct random effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses will be conducted for different justifications for placebo use and for studies sponsored/not sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry. Results: Our present findings will indicate the effects of placebo use as comparator regarding efficacy and safety of the oral synthetic medicines. Discussion: This systematic review will identify, summarize, and analyze if there is a trend for positive efficacy and safety results for synthetic medicines in clinical trials when compared with placebo and if the justification for placebo use is considered ethically acceptable. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018110829 Abbreviation: RCTs = randomized controlled clinical trials |
id |
UFRN_95a313ac4c55d862e042df6ade264fb3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/55329 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRN |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRN |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Piuvezam, GrasielaSilva, Juliana Carvalho Rocha Alves daAzevedo, Kesley Pablo Morais deFarinasso, Cecília MenezesSilva, Dayde Lane Mendonça daStefani, CristineFigueiredo, Ana Cláudia Morais GodoySouza, Patrícia Medeiros deCapucho, Helaine Carneirohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2343-72512023-11-14T19:08:46Z2023-11-14T19:08:46Z2020PIUVEZAM, Grasiela; SILVA, Juliana C. R. Alves da; AZEVEDO, Kesley Pablo Morais de; FARINASSO, Cecília Menezes; SILVA, Dayde Lane Mendonça da; STEFANI, Cristine; FIGUEIREDO, Ana Cláudia Morais Godoy; SOUZA, Patrícia Medeiros de; CAPUCHO, Helaine Carneiro. Placebo use and outcome quality. Medicine, [S.l.], v. 99, n. 44, p. 22915, 30 out. 2020. Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000022915. Disponível em: https://journals.lww.com/md-journal/fulltext/2020/10300/placebo_use_and_outcome_quality__a_protocol_for.54.aspx. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2023.https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/55329http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000022915Medicinehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt-brinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessclinical trialsnew drugsnew pharmaceutical productsplacebosystematic reviewPlacebo use and outcome quality: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBackground: The Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship, research outcome and quality has been already evaluated for clinical trials in order to analyze if this kind of sponsorship affects the results of clinical trials. In this sense, this study has the aim to investigate whether placebo use allows positive outcomes regarding efficacy and safety compared to synthetic medicines. Methods: We designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review for methodology data. We will only randomized clinical trials that use placebo as comparator. The main outcome will be the evaluation of placebo use regarding the tendency for positive results (efficacy and security) when comparing to synthetic medicines. PubMed, Cochrane, LILACS (BVS), Web of Science, Scopus, and Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE) databases will be searched. Gray literature will be identified through the databases Proquest (Dissertation and Theses), OpenGrey and Google Scholar. Two review authors will independently assess trial quality and will extract data in accordance with standard Cochrane methodology. If necessary, we will also contact authors for additional information. The Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool will be used. If feasible, it means homogenous data, we will conduct random effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses will be conducted for different justifications for placebo use and for studies sponsored/not sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry. Results: Our present findings will indicate the effects of placebo use as comparator regarding efficacy and safety of the oral synthetic medicines. Discussion: This systematic review will identify, summarize, and analyze if there is a trend for positive efficacy and safety results for synthetic medicines in clinical trials when compared with placebo and if the justification for placebo use is considered ethically acceptable. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018110829 Abbreviation: RCTs = randomized controlled clinical trialsengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRNinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNORIGINALPlaceboOutcomeQuality_Piuvezam_2020.pdfPlaceboOutcomeQuality_Piuvezam_2020.pdfapplication/pdf414737https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/55329/1/PlaceboOutcomeQuality_Piuvezam_2020.pdf66503b0772d1efcaabb8fc88d87e50dfMD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81484https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/55329/2/license.txte9597aa2854d128fd968be5edc8a28d9MD52123456789/553292023-11-14 16:09:15.061oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br: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Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttp://repositorio.ufrn.br/oai/opendoar:2023-11-14T19:09:15Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Placebo use and outcome quality: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
Placebo use and outcome quality: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Placebo use and outcome quality: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis Piuvezam, Grasiela clinical trials new drugs new pharmaceutical products placebo systematic review |
title_short |
Placebo use and outcome quality: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Placebo use and outcome quality: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Placebo use and outcome quality: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Placebo use and outcome quality: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Placebo use and outcome quality: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Piuvezam, Grasiela |
author_facet |
Piuvezam, Grasiela Silva, Juliana Carvalho Rocha Alves da Azevedo, Kesley Pablo Morais de Farinasso, Cecília Menezes Silva, Dayde Lane Mendonça da Stefani, Cristine Figueiredo, Ana Cláudia Morais Godoy Souza, Patrícia Medeiros de Capucho, Helaine Carneiro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Juliana Carvalho Rocha Alves da Azevedo, Kesley Pablo Morais de Farinasso, Cecília Menezes Silva, Dayde Lane Mendonça da Stefani, Cristine Figueiredo, Ana Cláudia Morais Godoy Souza, Patrícia Medeiros de Capucho, Helaine Carneiro |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.authorID.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2343-7251 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Piuvezam, Grasiela Silva, Juliana Carvalho Rocha Alves da Azevedo, Kesley Pablo Morais de Farinasso, Cecília Menezes Silva, Dayde Lane Mendonça da Stefani, Cristine Figueiredo, Ana Cláudia Morais Godoy Souza, Patrícia Medeiros de Capucho, Helaine Carneiro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
clinical trials new drugs new pharmaceutical products placebo systematic review |
topic |
clinical trials new drugs new pharmaceutical products placebo systematic review |
description |
Background: The Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship, research outcome and quality has been already evaluated for clinical trials in order to analyze if this kind of sponsorship affects the results of clinical trials. In this sense, this study has the aim to investigate whether placebo use allows positive outcomes regarding efficacy and safety compared to synthetic medicines. Methods: We designed and registered a study protocol for a systematic review for methodology data. We will only randomized clinical trials that use placebo as comparator. The main outcome will be the evaluation of placebo use regarding the tendency for positive results (efficacy and security) when comparing to synthetic medicines. PubMed, Cochrane, LILACS (BVS), Web of Science, Scopus, and Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE) databases will be searched. Gray literature will be identified through the databases Proquest (Dissertation and Theses), OpenGrey and Google Scholar. Two review authors will independently assess trial quality and will extract data in accordance with standard Cochrane methodology. If necessary, we will also contact authors for additional information. The Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool will be used. If feasible, it means homogenous data, we will conduct random effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses will be conducted for different justifications for placebo use and for studies sponsored/not sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry. Results: Our present findings will indicate the effects of placebo use as comparator regarding efficacy and safety of the oral synthetic medicines. Discussion: This systematic review will identify, summarize, and analyze if there is a trend for positive efficacy and safety results for synthetic medicines in clinical trials when compared with placebo and if the justification for placebo use is considered ethically acceptable. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018110829 Abbreviation: RCTs = randomized controlled clinical trials |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2020 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2023-11-14T19:08:46Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2023-11-14T19:08:46Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
PIUVEZAM, Grasiela; SILVA, Juliana C. R. Alves da; AZEVEDO, Kesley Pablo Morais de; FARINASSO, Cecília Menezes; SILVA, Dayde Lane Mendonça da; STEFANI, Cristine; FIGUEIREDO, Ana Cláudia Morais Godoy; SOUZA, Patrícia Medeiros de; CAPUCHO, Helaine Carneiro. Placebo use and outcome quality. Medicine, [S.l.], v. 99, n. 44, p. 22915, 30 out. 2020. Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000022915. Disponível em: https://journals.lww.com/md-journal/fulltext/2020/10300/placebo_use_and_outcome_quality__a_protocol_for.54.aspx. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2023. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/55329 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000022915 |
identifier_str_mv |
PIUVEZAM, Grasiela; SILVA, Juliana C. R. Alves da; AZEVEDO, Kesley Pablo Morais de; FARINASSO, Cecília Menezes; SILVA, Dayde Lane Mendonça da; STEFANI, Cristine; FIGUEIREDO, Ana Cláudia Morais Godoy; SOUZA, Patrícia Medeiros de; CAPUCHO, Helaine Carneiro. Placebo use and outcome quality. Medicine, [S.l.], v. 99, n. 44, p. 22915, 30 out. 2020. Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000022915. Disponível em: https://journals.lww.com/md-journal/fulltext/2020/10300/placebo_use_and_outcome_quality__a_protocol_for.54.aspx. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2023. |
url |
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/55329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000022915 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt-br info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt-br |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Medicine |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Medicine |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) instacron:UFRN |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
instacron_str |
UFRN |
institution |
UFRN |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRN |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRN |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/55329/1/PlaceboOutcomeQuality_Piuvezam_2020.pdf https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/55329/2/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
66503b0772d1efcaabb8fc88d87e50df e9597aa2854d128fd968be5edc8a28d9 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1814832801066778624 |