Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fayh, Ana Paula Trussardi
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Guedes, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira, Sousa, Iasmin Matias de, Medeiros, Galtieri Otávio Cunha de, Gonzalez, Maria Cristina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRN
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/55869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.05.010
Resumo: Background: Cancer is a disease with high and increasing incidence rates in the world and its course tends to harm the body composition. Monitoring these body changes is very important. Therefore, it is essential to have reliable, accessible, and practical methods for evaluating body compartments. This study aims to evaluate the correlation and agreement of results for the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) obtained from devices from different manufacturers. Methods: This is a single-center cross-sectional study including hospitalized patients with cancer. Two devices from different brands used for obtaining the BIA were used; both with a tetrapolar model and a single frequency (50 kHz). The results were evaluated for resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) and used to calculate the phase angle (PhA) and fat-free mass (FFM) indicators. Pearson and Spearman correlation tests and BlandeAltman plots were performed, with results expressed as bias and limits of agreement at 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results: We have included 116 patients, with a mean age of 60.8 ± 14.8, 51.7% were women. We have found very strong correlations between the measurements of R (rho ¼ 0.971) and FFM (r ¼ 0.979), and strong correlations for Xc (rho ¼ 0.784) and PhA (rho ¼ 0.768). However, the measurements did not agree between the methods. Conclusions: Commercial brands of devices used for the BIA influence the results generated, a factor that must be considered when choosing the most appropriate method for this analysis
id UFRN_d11075c3a37c305f0d590d0db07dde51
oai_identifier_str oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/55869
network_acronym_str UFRN
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRN
repository_id_str
spelling Fayh, Ana Paula TrussardiGuedes, Francisco Felipe de OliveiraSousa, Iasmin Matias deMedeiros, Galtieri Otávio Cunha deGonzalez, Maria Cristina2023-12-13T17:07:01Z2023-12-13T17:07:01Z2023-08GUEDES, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira; SOUSA, Iasmin Matias de; MEDEIROS, Galtieri Otávio Cunha de; GONZALEZ, Maria Cristina; FAYH, Ana Paula Trussardi. Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients. Clinical Nutrition Espen, [S.l.], v. 56, p. 120-126, ago. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.05.010. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405457723001341?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 6 dez. 2023.https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/55869http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.05.010Clinical Nutrition EspenAttribution 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBioelectrical impedance analysisNutritional evaluationBody compositionCancerIs there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patientsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBackground: Cancer is a disease with high and increasing incidence rates in the world and its course tends to harm the body composition. Monitoring these body changes is very important. Therefore, it is essential to have reliable, accessible, and practical methods for evaluating body compartments. This study aims to evaluate the correlation and agreement of results for the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) obtained from devices from different manufacturers. Methods: This is a single-center cross-sectional study including hospitalized patients with cancer. Two devices from different brands used for obtaining the BIA were used; both with a tetrapolar model and a single frequency (50 kHz). The results were evaluated for resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) and used to calculate the phase angle (PhA) and fat-free mass (FFM) indicators. Pearson and Spearman correlation tests and BlandeAltman plots were performed, with results expressed as bias and limits of agreement at 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results: We have included 116 patients, with a mean age of 60.8 ± 14.8, 51.7% were women. We have found very strong correlations between the measurements of R (rho ¼ 0.971) and FFM (r ¼ 0.979), and strong correlations for Xc (rho ¼ 0.784) and PhA (rho ¼ 0.768). However, the measurements did not agree between the methods. Conclusions: Commercial brands of devices used for the BIA influence the results generated, a factor that must be considered when choosing the most appropriate method for this analysisengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRNinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNORIGINALThereDifference_Guedes_2023.pdfThereDifference_Guedes_2023.pdfapplication/pdf1141034https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/55869/1/ThereDifference_Guedes_2023.pdf3d01ae8b155717d76b5ca79582723c23MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8914https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/55869/2/license_rdf4d2950bda3d176f570a9f8b328dfbbefMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81484https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/55869/3/license.txte9597aa2854d128fd968be5edc8a28d9MD53123456789/558692023-12-13 14:07:02.168oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br: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Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttp://repositorio.ufrn.br/oai/opendoar:2023-12-13T17:07:02Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients
title Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients
spellingShingle Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients
Fayh, Ana Paula Trussardi
Bioelectrical impedance analysis
Nutritional evaluation
Body composition
Cancer
title_short Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients
title_full Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients
title_fullStr Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients
title_sort Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients
author Fayh, Ana Paula Trussardi
author_facet Fayh, Ana Paula Trussardi
Guedes, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira
Sousa, Iasmin Matias de
Medeiros, Galtieri Otávio Cunha de
Gonzalez, Maria Cristina
author_role author
author2 Guedes, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira
Sousa, Iasmin Matias de
Medeiros, Galtieri Otávio Cunha de
Gonzalez, Maria Cristina
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fayh, Ana Paula Trussardi
Guedes, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira
Sousa, Iasmin Matias de
Medeiros, Galtieri Otávio Cunha de
Gonzalez, Maria Cristina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bioelectrical impedance analysis
Nutritional evaluation
Body composition
Cancer
topic Bioelectrical impedance analysis
Nutritional evaluation
Body composition
Cancer
description Background: Cancer is a disease with high and increasing incidence rates in the world and its course tends to harm the body composition. Monitoring these body changes is very important. Therefore, it is essential to have reliable, accessible, and practical methods for evaluating body compartments. This study aims to evaluate the correlation and agreement of results for the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) obtained from devices from different manufacturers. Methods: This is a single-center cross-sectional study including hospitalized patients with cancer. Two devices from different brands used for obtaining the BIA were used; both with a tetrapolar model and a single frequency (50 kHz). The results were evaluated for resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) and used to calculate the phase angle (PhA) and fat-free mass (FFM) indicators. Pearson and Spearman correlation tests and BlandeAltman plots were performed, with results expressed as bias and limits of agreement at 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results: We have included 116 patients, with a mean age of 60.8 ± 14.8, 51.7% were women. We have found very strong correlations between the measurements of R (rho ¼ 0.971) and FFM (r ¼ 0.979), and strong correlations for Xc (rho ¼ 0.784) and PhA (rho ¼ 0.768). However, the measurements did not agree between the methods. Conclusions: Commercial brands of devices used for the BIA influence the results generated, a factor that must be considered when choosing the most appropriate method for this analysis
publishDate 2023
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-12-13T17:07:01Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2023-12-13T17:07:01Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2023-08
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv GUEDES, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira; SOUSA, Iasmin Matias de; MEDEIROS, Galtieri Otávio Cunha de; GONZALEZ, Maria Cristina; FAYH, Ana Paula Trussardi. Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients. Clinical Nutrition Espen, [S.l.], v. 56, p. 120-126, ago. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.05.010. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405457723001341?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 6 dez. 2023.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/55869
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.05.010
identifier_str_mv GUEDES, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira; SOUSA, Iasmin Matias de; MEDEIROS, Galtieri Otávio Cunha de; GONZALEZ, Maria Cristina; FAYH, Ana Paula Trussardi. Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients. Clinical Nutrition Espen, [S.l.], v. 56, p. 120-126, ago. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.05.010. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405457723001341?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 6 dez. 2023.
url https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/55869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.05.010
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Clinical Nutrition Espen
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Clinical Nutrition Espen
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron:UFRN
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron_str UFRN
institution UFRN
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRN
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRN
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/55869/1/ThereDifference_Guedes_2023.pdf
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/55869/2/license_rdf
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/55869/3/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 3d01ae8b155717d76b5ca79582723c23
4d2950bda3d176f570a9f8b328dfbbef
e9597aa2854d128fd968be5edc8a28d9
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802117715187466240