Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRN |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/55869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.05.010 |
Resumo: | Background: Cancer is a disease with high and increasing incidence rates in the world and its course tends to harm the body composition. Monitoring these body changes is very important. Therefore, it is essential to have reliable, accessible, and practical methods for evaluating body compartments. This study aims to evaluate the correlation and agreement of results for the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) obtained from devices from different manufacturers. Methods: This is a single-center cross-sectional study including hospitalized patients with cancer. Two devices from different brands used for obtaining the BIA were used; both with a tetrapolar model and a single frequency (50 kHz). The results were evaluated for resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) and used to calculate the phase angle (PhA) and fat-free mass (FFM) indicators. Pearson and Spearman correlation tests and BlandeAltman plots were performed, with results expressed as bias and limits of agreement at 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results: We have included 116 patients, with a mean age of 60.8 ± 14.8, 51.7% were women. We have found very strong correlations between the measurements of R (rho ¼ 0.971) and FFM (r ¼ 0.979), and strong correlations for Xc (rho ¼ 0.784) and PhA (rho ¼ 0.768). However, the measurements did not agree between the methods. Conclusions: Commercial brands of devices used for the BIA influence the results generated, a factor that must be considered when choosing the most appropriate method for this analysis |
id |
UFRN_d11075c3a37c305f0d590d0db07dde51 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/55869 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRN |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRN |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Fayh, Ana Paula TrussardiGuedes, Francisco Felipe de OliveiraSousa, Iasmin Matias deMedeiros, Galtieri Otávio Cunha deGonzalez, Maria Cristina2023-12-13T17:07:01Z2023-12-13T17:07:01Z2023-08GUEDES, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira; SOUSA, Iasmin Matias de; MEDEIROS, Galtieri Otávio Cunha de; GONZALEZ, Maria Cristina; FAYH, Ana Paula Trussardi. Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients. Clinical Nutrition Espen, [S.l.], v. 56, p. 120-126, ago. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.05.010. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405457723001341?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 6 dez. 2023.https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/55869http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.05.010Clinical Nutrition EspenAttribution 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBioelectrical impedance analysisNutritional evaluationBody compositionCancerIs there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patientsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBackground: Cancer is a disease with high and increasing incidence rates in the world and its course tends to harm the body composition. Monitoring these body changes is very important. Therefore, it is essential to have reliable, accessible, and practical methods for evaluating body compartments. This study aims to evaluate the correlation and agreement of results for the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) obtained from devices from different manufacturers. Methods: This is a single-center cross-sectional study including hospitalized patients with cancer. Two devices from different brands used for obtaining the BIA were used; both with a tetrapolar model and a single frequency (50 kHz). The results were evaluated for resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) and used to calculate the phase angle (PhA) and fat-free mass (FFM) indicators. Pearson and Spearman correlation tests and BlandeAltman plots were performed, with results expressed as bias and limits of agreement at 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results: We have included 116 patients, with a mean age of 60.8 ± 14.8, 51.7% were women. We have found very strong correlations between the measurements of R (rho ¼ 0.971) and FFM (r ¼ 0.979), and strong correlations for Xc (rho ¼ 0.784) and PhA (rho ¼ 0.768). However, the measurements did not agree between the methods. Conclusions: Commercial brands of devices used for the BIA influence the results generated, a factor that must be considered when choosing the most appropriate method for this analysisengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRNinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNORIGINALThereDifference_Guedes_2023.pdfThereDifference_Guedes_2023.pdfapplication/pdf1141034https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/55869/1/ThereDifference_Guedes_2023.pdf3d01ae8b155717d76b5ca79582723c23MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8914https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/55869/2/license_rdf4d2950bda3d176f570a9f8b328dfbbefMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81484https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/55869/3/license.txte9597aa2854d128fd968be5edc8a28d9MD53123456789/558692023-12-13 14:07:02.168oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br: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Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttp://repositorio.ufrn.br/oai/opendoar:2023-12-13T17:07:02Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients |
title |
Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients |
spellingShingle |
Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients Fayh, Ana Paula Trussardi Bioelectrical impedance analysis Nutritional evaluation Body composition Cancer |
title_short |
Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients |
title_full |
Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients |
title_fullStr |
Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients |
title_sort |
Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients |
author |
Fayh, Ana Paula Trussardi |
author_facet |
Fayh, Ana Paula Trussardi Guedes, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira Sousa, Iasmin Matias de Medeiros, Galtieri Otávio Cunha de Gonzalez, Maria Cristina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Guedes, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira Sousa, Iasmin Matias de Medeiros, Galtieri Otávio Cunha de Gonzalez, Maria Cristina |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fayh, Ana Paula Trussardi Guedes, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira Sousa, Iasmin Matias de Medeiros, Galtieri Otávio Cunha de Gonzalez, Maria Cristina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bioelectrical impedance analysis Nutritional evaluation Body composition Cancer |
topic |
Bioelectrical impedance analysis Nutritional evaluation Body composition Cancer |
description |
Background: Cancer is a disease with high and increasing incidence rates in the world and its course tends to harm the body composition. Monitoring these body changes is very important. Therefore, it is essential to have reliable, accessible, and practical methods for evaluating body compartments. This study aims to evaluate the correlation and agreement of results for the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) obtained from devices from different manufacturers. Methods: This is a single-center cross-sectional study including hospitalized patients with cancer. Two devices from different brands used for obtaining the BIA were used; both with a tetrapolar model and a single frequency (50 kHz). The results were evaluated for resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) and used to calculate the phase angle (PhA) and fat-free mass (FFM) indicators. Pearson and Spearman correlation tests and BlandeAltman plots were performed, with results expressed as bias and limits of agreement at 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results: We have included 116 patients, with a mean age of 60.8 ± 14.8, 51.7% were women. We have found very strong correlations between the measurements of R (rho ¼ 0.971) and FFM (r ¼ 0.979), and strong correlations for Xc (rho ¼ 0.784) and PhA (rho ¼ 0.768). However, the measurements did not agree between the methods. Conclusions: Commercial brands of devices used for the BIA influence the results generated, a factor that must be considered when choosing the most appropriate method for this analysis |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-13T17:07:01Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-13T17:07:01Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2023-08 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
GUEDES, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira; SOUSA, Iasmin Matias de; MEDEIROS, Galtieri Otávio Cunha de; GONZALEZ, Maria Cristina; FAYH, Ana Paula Trussardi. Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients. Clinical Nutrition Espen, [S.l.], v. 56, p. 120-126, ago. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.05.010. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405457723001341?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 6 dez. 2023. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/55869 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.05.010 |
identifier_str_mv |
GUEDES, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira; SOUSA, Iasmin Matias de; MEDEIROS, Galtieri Otávio Cunha de; GONZALEZ, Maria Cristina; FAYH, Ana Paula Trussardi. Is there a difference in the parameters of the bioelectrical impedance obtained from devices from different manufacturers? a cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients. Clinical Nutrition Espen, [S.l.], v. 56, p. 120-126, ago. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.05.010. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405457723001341?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 6 dez. 2023. |
url |
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/55869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.05.010 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical Nutrition Espen |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical Nutrition Espen |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) instacron:UFRN |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
instacron_str |
UFRN |
institution |
UFRN |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRN |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRN |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/55869/1/ThereDifference_Guedes_2023.pdf https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/55869/2/license_rdf https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/55869/3/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
3d01ae8b155717d76b5ca79582723c23 4d2950bda3d176f570a9f8b328dfbbef e9597aa2854d128fd968be5edc8a28d9 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1802117715187466240 |