Gest?o do conhecimento pessoal: estudo de caso com pesquisadores seniores

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vasconcelos, Carlos Henrique de
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
Texto Completo: https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/3671
Resumo: The study is a qualitative research in which seniors researchers from a research center located in Rio de Janeiro were interviewed. The aim of this study was to comprehend how senior researchers deal with personal knowledge management. The Personal Knowledge Management, according to Wright (2005), can be defined as the capacity to access and apply information and cognitive resources in processes to improve effectiveness, the production and the worker individual innovation. Through the interview in depth, with a semi-structural guide, we got the perception of each interviewed about his/her personal knowledge management practices. From the inductive analysis of Thomas (2006) five categories were identified. The first of them represents the perception from the interviewed about what personal knowledge management represents, and the other four represent the way these interviewed deal with their own knowledge. The categories that represent the identified processes were: (i) manage demand by knowledge, (ii) manage learning, (iii) manage connections, and (iv) manage expertise. The first category identified that the process of managing demand by knowledge can start from the company. The second process is about managing learning through the activities with the aim to get new knowledges, considering the extent and depth of the knowledge need to execute the expertise activities. The process of managing connections represents the search, construction and application of the personal knowledge through connections with individuals from the personal web, also including the institutions in which these members of web belong to. The fourth and last category identified the process of managing expertise, which are those activities that the individual develops effectively in his specified knowledge. They can reinforce or alter the knowledge that the individual has. It is when the individual knowledge normally incorporates the organization's knowledge. The research also shows conflicts in results found out in the references, influenced by the Pattern Match technique, proposed by Trochim (1989), building a comparative board among the found results and the PKM models of Efimova (2005), Wright (2005), Cheong and Tsui (2011), and Sondari (2013). The result highlights that management practices need to adapt to new forms of employee contribution, and that better understanding this process at the individual level, organizations can facilitate and benefit from personal knowledge management.
id UFRRJ-1_d17c56ba60d31373631c61563746bd5f
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:jspui/3671
network_acronym_str UFRRJ-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
repository_id_str
spelling Ramos Filho, Am?rico da Costaxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3305607479621540Vilardi, Beatriz QuirozBaleeiro, Raquel Borbaxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6983461513577728Vasconcelos, Carlos Henrique de2020-06-24T14:06:25Z2014-05-21Vasconcelos, Carlos Henrique de. Gest?o do conhecimento pessoal: estudo de caso com pesquisadores seniores. 2014. [119 f.]. Disserta??o( Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Gest?o e Estrat?gia) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, [Serop?dica-RJ] .https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/3671The study is a qualitative research in which seniors researchers from a research center located in Rio de Janeiro were interviewed. The aim of this study was to comprehend how senior researchers deal with personal knowledge management. The Personal Knowledge Management, according to Wright (2005), can be defined as the capacity to access and apply information and cognitive resources in processes to improve effectiveness, the production and the worker individual innovation. Through the interview in depth, with a semi-structural guide, we got the perception of each interviewed about his/her personal knowledge management practices. From the inductive analysis of Thomas (2006) five categories were identified. The first of them represents the perception from the interviewed about what personal knowledge management represents, and the other four represent the way these interviewed deal with their own knowledge. The categories that represent the identified processes were: (i) manage demand by knowledge, (ii) manage learning, (iii) manage connections, and (iv) manage expertise. The first category identified that the process of managing demand by knowledge can start from the company. The second process is about managing learning through the activities with the aim to get new knowledges, considering the extent and depth of the knowledge need to execute the expertise activities. The process of managing connections represents the search, construction and application of the personal knowledge through connections with individuals from the personal web, also including the institutions in which these members of web belong to. The fourth and last category identified the process of managing expertise, which are those activities that the individual develops effectively in his specified knowledge. They can reinforce or alter the knowledge that the individual has. It is when the individual knowledge normally incorporates the organization's knowledge. The research also shows conflicts in results found out in the references, influenced by the Pattern Match technique, proposed by Trochim (1989), building a comparative board among the found results and the PKM models of Efimova (2005), Wright (2005), Cheong and Tsui (2011), and Sondari (2013). The result highlights that management practices need to adapt to new forms of employee contribution, and that better understanding this process at the individual level, organizations can facilitate and benefit from personal knowledge management.Para esta pesquisa qualitativa descritiva foram entrevistados pesquisadores seniores de um centro de pesquisa na cidade do Rio de Janeiro. O objetivo do estudo foi compreender como pesquisadores seniores realizam a Gest?o do Conhecimento Pessoal, ou Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), que, segundo Wright (2005), pode ser definida como a capacidade de acessar e aplicar informa??es e recursos cognitivos em processos para melhorar a efic?cia, a produtividade e a inova??o individual do trabalhador. Atrav?s de entrevista em profundidade, com roteiro semiestruturado, levantou-se a percep??o de cada pesquisado sobre suas pr?ticas de gest?o do conhecimento pessoal. A partir da an?lise indutiva de Thomas (2006), foram identificadas cinco categorias. A primeira representa a percep??o pelos pesquisados do processo de gest?o do conhecimento pessoal; as quatro seguintes como estes pesquisadores gerenciam o pr?prio conhecimento. As categorias que representam os microprocessos identificados foram: (i) gerir demanda por conhecimento; (ii) gerir aprendizagem; (iii) gerir conex?es e (iv) gerir expertise. A primeira categoria identificou que o processo de gerir demanda por conhecimento pode partir tanto da empresa, quanto por iniciativa do indiv?duo. O segundo processo ? o de gerir aprendizagem atrav?s de atividades, com o objetivo de obter novos conhecimentos. O terceiro processo, gerir conex?es, representa a busca, constru??o e aplica??o do conhecimento pessoal por meio de v?nculos e intera??es com os indiv?duos de sua rede pessoal. A quarta e ?ltima categoria identificou o processo de gerir expertise, que s?o aquelas atividades em que o indiv?duo desenvolve efetivamente seu conhecimento especializado, e que podem refor?ar ou alterar o conhecimento que o indiv?duo possui. ? neste momento que o conhecimento do indiv?duo normalmente se incorpora ao conhecimento da organiza??o. Estes resultados encontrados foram confrontados com o referencial te?rico pesquisado, influenciado pela t?cnica de Correspond?ncia de Padr?es (Pattern Matching) proposta por Trochim (1989), construindo um quadro comparativo entre o resultado encontrado e os modelos de PKM de Efimova (2005), Wright (2005), Cheong e Tsui (2011) e Sondari (2013). O resultado ressalta que as pr?ticas de gest?o precisam se adequar ?s novas formas de contribui??o do empregado, e que, compreendendo melhor este processo no n?vel do indiv?duo, as organiza??es poder?o facilitar e se beneficiar da gest?o do conhecimento pessoal.Submitted by Celso Magalhaes (celsomagalhaes@ufrrj.br) on 2020-06-24T14:06:25Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2014 - Carlos Henrique de Vasconcelos.pdf: 4630079 bytes, checksum: 70994177242c595643b99f78fdf3e500 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2020-06-24T14:06:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2014 - Carlos Henrique de Vasconcelos.pdf: 4630079 bytes, checksum: 70994177242c595643b99f78fdf3e500 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-05-21application/pdfhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/60883/2014%20-%20Carlos%20Henrique%20de%20Vasconcelos.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de JaneiroPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em Gest?o e Estrat?giaUFRRJBrasilInstituto de Ci?ncias Sociais AplicadasAGNIHOTRI, Raj. TROUTT, Marvin D., The effective use of technology in personal knowledge management. A framework of skills, tools and user context. Online Information Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited v. 33, n. 2, p. 329-342, 2008. ALVARENGA NETO, Rivad?via Correa Drummond. Gest?o de Conhecimento em Organiza??o em organiza??es: proposta de mapeamento conceitual integrativo. S?o Paulo: Saraiva, 2008. AMORIN, Tania Nobre Gon?alves Ferreira. Gest?o estrat?gica de Pessoas e Inova??o: Uma parceria essencial. Ano IV, out. 2011/mar. 2012. ANTONELLO in Ruas, Roberto; ANTONELLO, Claudia Simone; BOFF, Luiz Henrique. Os novos horizontes da Gest?o: Aprendizagem Organizacional e Compet?ncias. Porto Alegre, Bookman, 2005. APSHVALKA, Dace; WENDORFF, Peter. A Framework of Personal Knowledge Management in the Context of Organisational Knowledge Management, ECKM 2005, pp. 34?41 Dispon?vel em: <http://integrative-paradigm.org/papers/Eckm2005Dace_156.pdf>. Acesso em 05/05/2013. BANDEIRA-DE-MELLO, R.; CUNHA, C. J. C. A. Operacionalizando o M?todo da Grounded Theory nas Pesquisas em Estrat?gia: T?cnicas e Procedimentos de An?lise com Apoio do Software Atlas/TI. In: Encontro de Estudos em Estrat?gias 3ES, 1, 2003, Curitiba. Anais... Rio de Janeiro: ANPAD, 2003. ______. Administrando o Risco: Uma teoria Substantiva da Adapta??o Estrat?gica de Pequenas Empresas e Ambientes Turbulentos e com forte Influ?ncia Governamental. RAC, Edi??o Especial, p.157-179, 2004. BESSANT, Jonh; PAVIT, Keith; TIDD, Joe. Gest?o da inova??o. BECKER, Elizamar R. (Trad.). 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2008. CHARMAZ, Kathy. A Constru??o da teoria fundamentada: Guia Pr?tico para a An?lise Qualitativa. S?o Paulo, Artmed, 2009. CHEONG, Ricky K.F., TSUI, Eric. From Skills and Competencies or outcome-basead Collaborative work: Tracking a Decade?s Development of Personal Knowledge Management (PKM) Models. Knowledge and Process Management. v. 18, N.3, p. 175-193, 2011. CROSSAN, Maria M.; LANE, Henry W.; WHITE, Roderick E. An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution. The Academy of Management Review, v. 24, n. 3, p. 522-537, jul. 1999. CUNHA, Neila Concei??o Viana da. As pr?ticas gerenciais promovendo a capacidade de inova??o: Estudo de M?ltiplos casos. Revista ADM.MADE, ano 8, v.12, n.3, p.107-132. set/dez, 2008. 114 DA COSTA, Priscila Rezende. Capacita??o e inova??o: Aspectos do desenvolvimento interno e externo nas multinacionais brasileiras. REGE, S?o Paulo, v. 18, n. 3, p. 297-322, jul./set. 2011. DAVENPORT, T. H. Personal knowledge management and knowledge worker capabilities. In: PAULEEN, D. J.; GORMAN, G. E. (org.) Personal Knowledge Management: individual, organizational and social perspectives. Farnham Surrey, England: Gower Publishing Limited, 2011. DAVENPORT, Thomas H.; PRUSSAK, Laurence. Conhecimento Empresarial - Como as organiza??es gerenciam o seu capital intelectual. 3 ed. S?o Paulo: Campus, 1998. EASTERBY-SMITH, Mark; THORPE, Richard & LOWE, Andy. Pesquisa gerencial em administra??o. Um guia para monografias, disserta??es, pesquisas internas e trabalhos de consultoria. S?o Paulo: Pioneira, 1999. EFIMOVA, L. Understanding personal knowledge management: A weblog case. Enschede: Telematica Institut, 2005. FELL, A. F. A., RODRIGUES FILHO, J., OLIVEIRA, R.R. Um Estudo da produ??o acad?mica nacional sobre gest?o do conhecimento atrav?s da teoria do conhecimento de Habermas. Revista de Gest?o e Tecnologia e Sistemas de Informa??o. v. 5, N. 2, 2008, p. 251-268. FINGER, Matias; BRAND, Silvia B?rgin, in: Aprendizagem Organizacional e Organiza??o de aprendizagem: Desenvolvimento na teoria e na pr?tica. Coordenadores Easterby-Smith, Mark, John Burgoyne, Araujo, Luis. Tradu??o de Sylvia Maria Azevedo Roesch. S?o Paulo: Atlas 2001. FLEURY, Afonso; FLEURY, Maria Tereza Leme. Aprendizagem e Inova??o organizacional: As experi?ncias do Jap?o, Cor?ia e Brasil. 2. ed. S?o Paulo, Atlas, 2012. FRAND, Jason; HIXON, Carol. (1999). Personal Knowledge Management : Who, What, Why, When, Where, How?. Dispon?vel em: <http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/faculty/ jason.frand/researcher/speeches/PKM.htm> Acesso em 10 de maio de 2013. GORMAN, G. E.; PAULEEN, D. J. The nature and value of personal knowledge management. IN: PAULEEN, D. J.; GORMAN, G. E. (Org.) Personal knowledge management: individual, organizational and social perspectives. Farnham Surrey, England: Gower Publishing Limited, 2011. HANASHIRO, D.M.M., TEIXEIRA, M.L.M, ZACCARELLI, L.M. Gest?o do Fator Humano - Uma vis?o baseada em Stakeholders. 2. ed. S?o Paulo: Saraiva, 2010. JAIN, Priti (2011). Personal Knowledge Management: the Foundation of Organisational Knowledge Management. SA Jnl Libs & Info Sci, v. 77, N. 1, p. 1-14. KOLB, David A. in: Starkey, Ken. Como as organiza??es aprendem: relatos do sucesso das grandes empresas. Trad. Lenke Peres. S?o Paulo, Futura, 1997. 115 LEITE, Luiz Fernando. Inova??o o combust?vel do futuro. Rio de Janeiro, Qualitymark, 2005. NONAKA, I. ; TAKEUCHI, H. Cria??o de conhecimento na empresa: como as empresas japonesas geram a din?mica da inova??o. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1997. ______. Gest?o do Conhecimento. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2008. NONAKA, Ikujir; KROUGH Georg von. Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory. Organization Science. v. 20, N. 3, p. 635-652, May-June 2009. MACHADO, Denise Del Pra Netto. Inova??o e cultura Organizacional: Um estudo dos elementos culturais que fazem parte de um ambiente inovador. Tese (Administra??o de Empresas), Funda??o Getulio Vargas, S?o Paulo, 2004. MARGARYAN, Anoush. MILLIGAN Colin, LITTLEJOHN Alisson. Validation of Davenport?s classification structure of knowledge-intensive processes. Jounal of knowledge management. v.15; n. 4. p. 568-587, 2011. OCDE. Manuel de Oslo ? Diretrizes para a Coleta e interpreta??o de dados sobre inova??o. Trad. FINEP. 3rd Edition OECD. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2005. PATTON, M.Q. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2. ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990. PAULEEN D. Personal knowledge management: putting the ?person? back into the knowledge equation. Online Information Review. V. 33, n. 2, p. 221?224. 2009. PROBST, Gilbert; RAUB, Steffen; HOMHARDT, Kai. Gest?o do Conhecimento: Os elementos construtivos do sucesso. Trad. Maria Adelaide Carpigiani. Porto Alegre. Bookman, 2002. PRUSAK, L.; CRANEFIELD, J. Managing your own knowledge: a personal perspective. In: PAULEEN, D. J.; GORMAN, G. E.(Org.) Personal Knowledge Management: individual, organizational and social perspectives. Farnham Surrey, England: Gower Publishing Limited, 2011. RAZMERITA L, KIRCHNER K, SUDZINA F. 2009. Personal knowledge management: the role of Web 2.0 tools for managing knowledge at individual and organizational levels. Online Information Review, v. 33, n. 6, p. 1468?4527. ROCHA-NETO, Ivan. Gest?o do conhecimento e complexidade. Revista de Gest?o e Projetos - GeP, S?o Paulo, v. 3, n. 1, p. 94-126, jan./jun. 2012. ROESCH, Sylvia Maria Azevedo. Projetos de Est?gios e de Pesquisa em Administra??o. S?o Paulo: Atlas, 1999. STAKE, Robert. Estudo de Caso: Planejamento e M?todos. Trad. Ana Thorell; 4. ed. Porto Alegre, 2010. 116 SENGE, Peter M. A Quinta Disciplina: arte e pr?tica da organiza??o que aprende. 28. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Best Seller, 2012. STRAUSS, A.; CORBIN. J. Pesquisa Qualitativa: t?cnicas e procedimentos para o desenvolvimento de Teoria Fundamentada. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2008. SONDARI, Mery Citra. Personal Knowledge Management 2.0. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, v. 3, N. 4, July 2013. TAKEUCHI, H ; NONAKA, I. Cria??o e dial?tica do conhecimento. IN: TAKEUCHI, H ; NONAKA. Gest?o do conhecimento. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2008. Thomas,D.R. A General inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. America Journal of evaluation. v. 27, n. 2, Jun. 2006. TROCHIM, W. M. K. Outcome pattern matching and program theory. Evaluation and Program Planning. v. 12, p. 355-366, 1989. VERGARA, Sylvia Constant. M?todos de pesquisa em Administra??o. S?o Paulo: Atlas, 2005. ______. Projetos e relat?rios de pesquisas em administra??o. 12. ed. S?o Paulo, 2010. VOLKEL M, ABECKER A. Cost-benefit analysis for the design of personal knowledge management systems. In ICEIS 2008 - International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems; p. 95-105. 2008. WRIGHT K.. Personal knowledge management: supporting individual knowledge worker performance. Knowledge Management Research and Practice: p. 156?165. 2005. YIN, Robert K. Estudo de Caso: planejamento e m?todos; 3 ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005. ZHANG, Zuopeng. Online Information Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, v. 33 N. 2, p. 237-256, 2009.Gest?o do Conhecimento PessoalPKMPersonal Knowledge ManagementGest?o do ConhecimentoKnowledge ManagementPersonal Knowledge ManagementPKMAdministra??oGest?o do conhecimento pessoal: estudo de caso com pesquisadores senioresPersonal knowledge management: case study with senior researchersinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJinstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)instacron:UFRRJLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82089http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3671/1/license.txt7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7MD51ORIGINAL2014 - Carlos Henrique de Vasconcelos.pdf2014 - Carlos Henrique de Vasconcelos.pdfapplication/pdf4630079http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3671/2/2014+-+Carlos+Henrique+de+Vasconcelos.pdf70994177242c595643b99f78fdf3e500MD52TEXT2014 - Carlos Henrique de Vasconcelos.pdf.txt2014 - Carlos Henrique de Vasconcelos.pdf.txttext/plain266564http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3671/3/2014+-+Carlos+Henrique+de+Vasconcelos.pdf.txt0e069420d64b4a56c88a73f5680d5f46MD53THUMBNAIL2014 - Carlos Henrique de Vasconcelos.pdf.jpg2014 - Carlos Henrique de Vasconcelos.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg2134http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3671/4/2014+-+Carlos+Henrique+de+Vasconcelos.pdf.jpg642bfdf679a565efc20cdeccc24a98b9MD54jspui/36712020-06-25 01:01:04.689oai:localhost: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://tede.ufrrj.br/PUBhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/oai/requestbibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.bropendoar:2020-06-25T04:01:04Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Gest?o do conhecimento pessoal: estudo de caso com pesquisadores seniores
dc.title.alternative.por.fl_str_mv Personal knowledge management: case study with senior researchers
title Gest?o do conhecimento pessoal: estudo de caso com pesquisadores seniores
spellingShingle Gest?o do conhecimento pessoal: estudo de caso com pesquisadores seniores
Vasconcelos, Carlos Henrique de
Gest?o do Conhecimento Pessoal
PKM
Personal Knowledge Management
Gest?o do Conhecimento
Knowledge Management
Personal Knowledge Management
PKM
Administra??o
title_short Gest?o do conhecimento pessoal: estudo de caso com pesquisadores seniores
title_full Gest?o do conhecimento pessoal: estudo de caso com pesquisadores seniores
title_fullStr Gest?o do conhecimento pessoal: estudo de caso com pesquisadores seniores
title_full_unstemmed Gest?o do conhecimento pessoal: estudo de caso com pesquisadores seniores
title_sort Gest?o do conhecimento pessoal: estudo de caso com pesquisadores seniores
author Vasconcelos, Carlos Henrique de
author_facet Vasconcelos, Carlos Henrique de
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Ramos Filho, Am?rico da Costa
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3305607479621540
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Vilardi, Beatriz Quiroz
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Baleeiro, Raquel Borba
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6983461513577728
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vasconcelos, Carlos Henrique de
contributor_str_mv Ramos Filho, Am?rico da Costa
Vilardi, Beatriz Quiroz
Baleeiro, Raquel Borba
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gest?o do Conhecimento Pessoal
PKM
Personal Knowledge Management
Gest?o do Conhecimento
topic Gest?o do Conhecimento Pessoal
PKM
Personal Knowledge Management
Gest?o do Conhecimento
Knowledge Management
Personal Knowledge Management
PKM
Administra??o
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Knowledge Management
Personal Knowledge Management
PKM
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv Administra??o
description The study is a qualitative research in which seniors researchers from a research center located in Rio de Janeiro were interviewed. The aim of this study was to comprehend how senior researchers deal with personal knowledge management. The Personal Knowledge Management, according to Wright (2005), can be defined as the capacity to access and apply information and cognitive resources in processes to improve effectiveness, the production and the worker individual innovation. Through the interview in depth, with a semi-structural guide, we got the perception of each interviewed about his/her personal knowledge management practices. From the inductive analysis of Thomas (2006) five categories were identified. The first of them represents the perception from the interviewed about what personal knowledge management represents, and the other four represent the way these interviewed deal with their own knowledge. The categories that represent the identified processes were: (i) manage demand by knowledge, (ii) manage learning, (iii) manage connections, and (iv) manage expertise. The first category identified that the process of managing demand by knowledge can start from the company. The second process is about managing learning through the activities with the aim to get new knowledges, considering the extent and depth of the knowledge need to execute the expertise activities. The process of managing connections represents the search, construction and application of the personal knowledge through connections with individuals from the personal web, also including the institutions in which these members of web belong to. The fourth and last category identified the process of managing expertise, which are those activities that the individual develops effectively in his specified knowledge. They can reinforce or alter the knowledge that the individual has. It is when the individual knowledge normally incorporates the organization's knowledge. The research also shows conflicts in results found out in the references, influenced by the Pattern Match technique, proposed by Trochim (1989), building a comparative board among the found results and the PKM models of Efimova (2005), Wright (2005), Cheong and Tsui (2011), and Sondari (2013). The result highlights that management practices need to adapt to new forms of employee contribution, and that better understanding this process at the individual level, organizations can facilitate and benefit from personal knowledge management.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2014-05-21
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-06-24T14:06:25Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Vasconcelos, Carlos Henrique de. Gest?o do conhecimento pessoal: estudo de caso com pesquisadores seniores. 2014. [119 f.]. Disserta??o( Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Gest?o e Estrat?gia) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, [Serop?dica-RJ] .
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/3671
identifier_str_mv Vasconcelos, Carlos Henrique de. Gest?o do conhecimento pessoal: estudo de caso com pesquisadores seniores. 2014. [119 f.]. Disserta??o( Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Gest?o e Estrat?gia) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, [Serop?dica-RJ] .
url https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/3671
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.references.por.fl_str_mv AGNIHOTRI, Raj. TROUTT, Marvin D., The effective use of technology in personal knowledge management. A framework of skills, tools and user context. Online Information Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited v. 33, n. 2, p. 329-342, 2008. ALVARENGA NETO, Rivad?via Correa Drummond. Gest?o de Conhecimento em Organiza??o em organiza??es: proposta de mapeamento conceitual integrativo. S?o Paulo: Saraiva, 2008. AMORIN, Tania Nobre Gon?alves Ferreira. Gest?o estrat?gica de Pessoas e Inova??o: Uma parceria essencial. Ano IV, out. 2011/mar. 2012. ANTONELLO in Ruas, Roberto; ANTONELLO, Claudia Simone; BOFF, Luiz Henrique. Os novos horizontes da Gest?o: Aprendizagem Organizacional e Compet?ncias. Porto Alegre, Bookman, 2005. APSHVALKA, Dace; WENDORFF, Peter. A Framework of Personal Knowledge Management in the Context of Organisational Knowledge Management, ECKM 2005, pp. 34?41 Dispon?vel em: <http://integrative-paradigm.org/papers/Eckm2005Dace_156.pdf>. Acesso em 05/05/2013. BANDEIRA-DE-MELLO, R.; CUNHA, C. J. C. A. Operacionalizando o M?todo da Grounded Theory nas Pesquisas em Estrat?gia: T?cnicas e Procedimentos de An?lise com Apoio do Software Atlas/TI. In: Encontro de Estudos em Estrat?gias 3ES, 1, 2003, Curitiba. Anais... Rio de Janeiro: ANPAD, 2003. ______. Administrando o Risco: Uma teoria Substantiva da Adapta??o Estrat?gica de Pequenas Empresas e Ambientes Turbulentos e com forte Influ?ncia Governamental. RAC, Edi??o Especial, p.157-179, 2004. BESSANT, Jonh; PAVIT, Keith; TIDD, Joe. Gest?o da inova??o. BECKER, Elizamar R. (Trad.). 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2008. CHARMAZ, Kathy. A Constru??o da teoria fundamentada: Guia Pr?tico para a An?lise Qualitativa. S?o Paulo, Artmed, 2009. CHEONG, Ricky K.F., TSUI, Eric. From Skills and Competencies or outcome-basead Collaborative work: Tracking a Decade?s Development of Personal Knowledge Management (PKM) Models. Knowledge and Process Management. v. 18, N.3, p. 175-193, 2011. CROSSAN, Maria M.; LANE, Henry W.; WHITE, Roderick E. An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution. The Academy of Management Review, v. 24, n. 3, p. 522-537, jul. 1999. CUNHA, Neila Concei??o Viana da. As pr?ticas gerenciais promovendo a capacidade de inova??o: Estudo de M?ltiplos casos. Revista ADM.MADE, ano 8, v.12, n.3, p.107-132. set/dez, 2008. 114 DA COSTA, Priscila Rezende. Capacita??o e inova??o: Aspectos do desenvolvimento interno e externo nas multinacionais brasileiras. REGE, S?o Paulo, v. 18, n. 3, p. 297-322, jul./set. 2011. DAVENPORT, T. H. Personal knowledge management and knowledge worker capabilities. In: PAULEEN, D. J.; GORMAN, G. E. (org.) Personal Knowledge Management: individual, organizational and social perspectives. Farnham Surrey, England: Gower Publishing Limited, 2011. DAVENPORT, Thomas H.; PRUSSAK, Laurence. Conhecimento Empresarial - Como as organiza??es gerenciam o seu capital intelectual. 3 ed. S?o Paulo: Campus, 1998. EASTERBY-SMITH, Mark; THORPE, Richard & LOWE, Andy. Pesquisa gerencial em administra??o. Um guia para monografias, disserta??es, pesquisas internas e trabalhos de consultoria. S?o Paulo: Pioneira, 1999. EFIMOVA, L. Understanding personal knowledge management: A weblog case. Enschede: Telematica Institut, 2005. FELL, A. F. A., RODRIGUES FILHO, J., OLIVEIRA, R.R. Um Estudo da produ??o acad?mica nacional sobre gest?o do conhecimento atrav?s da teoria do conhecimento de Habermas. Revista de Gest?o e Tecnologia e Sistemas de Informa??o. v. 5, N. 2, 2008, p. 251-268. FINGER, Matias; BRAND, Silvia B?rgin, in: Aprendizagem Organizacional e Organiza??o de aprendizagem: Desenvolvimento na teoria e na pr?tica. Coordenadores Easterby-Smith, Mark, John Burgoyne, Araujo, Luis. Tradu??o de Sylvia Maria Azevedo Roesch. S?o Paulo: Atlas 2001. FLEURY, Afonso; FLEURY, Maria Tereza Leme. Aprendizagem e Inova??o organizacional: As experi?ncias do Jap?o, Cor?ia e Brasil. 2. ed. S?o Paulo, Atlas, 2012. FRAND, Jason; HIXON, Carol. (1999). Personal Knowledge Management : Who, What, Why, When, Where, How?. Dispon?vel em: <http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/faculty/ jason.frand/researcher/speeches/PKM.htm> Acesso em 10 de maio de 2013. GORMAN, G. E.; PAULEEN, D. J. The nature and value of personal knowledge management. IN: PAULEEN, D. J.; GORMAN, G. E. (Org.) Personal knowledge management: individual, organizational and social perspectives. Farnham Surrey, England: Gower Publishing Limited, 2011. HANASHIRO, D.M.M., TEIXEIRA, M.L.M, ZACCARELLI, L.M. Gest?o do Fator Humano - Uma vis?o baseada em Stakeholders. 2. ed. S?o Paulo: Saraiva, 2010. JAIN, Priti (2011). Personal Knowledge Management: the Foundation of Organisational Knowledge Management. SA Jnl Libs & Info Sci, v. 77, N. 1, p. 1-14. KOLB, David A. in: Starkey, Ken. Como as organiza??es aprendem: relatos do sucesso das grandes empresas. Trad. Lenke Peres. S?o Paulo, Futura, 1997. 115 LEITE, Luiz Fernando. Inova??o o combust?vel do futuro. Rio de Janeiro, Qualitymark, 2005. NONAKA, I. ; TAKEUCHI, H. Cria??o de conhecimento na empresa: como as empresas japonesas geram a din?mica da inova??o. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1997. ______. Gest?o do Conhecimento. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2008. NONAKA, Ikujir; KROUGH Georg von. Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory. Organization Science. v. 20, N. 3, p. 635-652, May-June 2009. MACHADO, Denise Del Pra Netto. Inova??o e cultura Organizacional: Um estudo dos elementos culturais que fazem parte de um ambiente inovador. Tese (Administra??o de Empresas), Funda??o Getulio Vargas, S?o Paulo, 2004. MARGARYAN, Anoush. MILLIGAN Colin, LITTLEJOHN Alisson. Validation of Davenport?s classification structure of knowledge-intensive processes. Jounal of knowledge management. v.15; n. 4. p. 568-587, 2011. OCDE. Manuel de Oslo ? Diretrizes para a Coleta e interpreta??o de dados sobre inova??o. Trad. FINEP. 3rd Edition OECD. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2005. PATTON, M.Q. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2. ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990. PAULEEN D. Personal knowledge management: putting the ?person? back into the knowledge equation. Online Information Review. V. 33, n. 2, p. 221?224. 2009. PROBST, Gilbert; RAUB, Steffen; HOMHARDT, Kai. Gest?o do Conhecimento: Os elementos construtivos do sucesso. Trad. Maria Adelaide Carpigiani. Porto Alegre. Bookman, 2002. PRUSAK, L.; CRANEFIELD, J. Managing your own knowledge: a personal perspective. In: PAULEEN, D. J.; GORMAN, G. E.(Org.) Personal Knowledge Management: individual, organizational and social perspectives. Farnham Surrey, England: Gower Publishing Limited, 2011. RAZMERITA L, KIRCHNER K, SUDZINA F. 2009. Personal knowledge management: the role of Web 2.0 tools for managing knowledge at individual and organizational levels. Online Information Review, v. 33, n. 6, p. 1468?4527. ROCHA-NETO, Ivan. Gest?o do conhecimento e complexidade. Revista de Gest?o e Projetos - GeP, S?o Paulo, v. 3, n. 1, p. 94-126, jan./jun. 2012. ROESCH, Sylvia Maria Azevedo. Projetos de Est?gios e de Pesquisa em Administra??o. S?o Paulo: Atlas, 1999. STAKE, Robert. Estudo de Caso: Planejamento e M?todos. Trad. Ana Thorell; 4. ed. Porto Alegre, 2010. 116 SENGE, Peter M. A Quinta Disciplina: arte e pr?tica da organiza??o que aprende. 28. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Best Seller, 2012. STRAUSS, A.; CORBIN. J. Pesquisa Qualitativa: t?cnicas e procedimentos para o desenvolvimento de Teoria Fundamentada. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2008. SONDARI, Mery Citra. Personal Knowledge Management 2.0. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, v. 3, N. 4, July 2013. TAKEUCHI, H ; NONAKA, I. Cria??o e dial?tica do conhecimento. IN: TAKEUCHI, H ; NONAKA. Gest?o do conhecimento. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2008. Thomas,D.R. A General inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. America Journal of evaluation. v. 27, n. 2, Jun. 2006. TROCHIM, W. M. K. Outcome pattern matching and program theory. Evaluation and Program Planning. v. 12, p. 355-366, 1989. VERGARA, Sylvia Constant. M?todos de pesquisa em Administra??o. S?o Paulo: Atlas, 2005. ______. Projetos e relat?rios de pesquisas em administra??o. 12. ed. S?o Paulo, 2010. VOLKEL M, ABECKER A. Cost-benefit analysis for the design of personal knowledge management systems. In ICEIS 2008 - International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems; p. 95-105. 2008. WRIGHT K.. Personal knowledge management: supporting individual knowledge worker performance. Knowledge Management Research and Practice: p. 156?165. 2005. YIN, Robert K. Estudo de Caso: planejamento e m?todos; 3 ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005. ZHANG, Zuopeng. Online Information Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, v. 33 N. 2, p. 237-256, 2009.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Gest?o e Estrat?gia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFRRJ
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Instituto de Ci?ncias Sociais Aplicadas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron:UFRRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron_str UFRRJ
institution UFRRJ
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3671/1/license.txt
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3671/2/2014+-+Carlos+Henrique+de+Vasconcelos.pdf
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3671/3/2014+-+Carlos+Henrique+de+Vasconcelos.pdf.txt
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/3671/4/2014+-+Carlos+Henrique+de+Vasconcelos.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7
70994177242c595643b99f78fdf3e500
0e069420d64b4a56c88a73f5680d5f46
642bfdf679a565efc20cdeccc24a98b9
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.br
_version_ 1800313506349711360