HUMAN SCIENCES UNDERGRADUATES’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT ACADEMIC READING AND WRITING PRACTICES IN THE REMOTE ACADEMIC REGIME
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Travessias Interativas |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufs.br/Travessias/article/view/17015 |
Resumo: | In the new circumstances imposed by the pandemic contexto, this work aimed to investigate the perception of Letters and Pedagogy students, through an online questionnaire, on the interference of hyperdigitalization of pedagogical practices in their academic literacy. Data were analyzed in the light of the Literacy Studies approach (STREET, 2009; LEA; STREET, 2006, ASSIS, 2014; CURRY; LILLIS, 2014 and others). 87% attested that the remote academic regime (RLR) negatively affected their reading ans writing practices, due to diferente factors: ergonomic (excessive hours in front of the computer); time management (high load of readings, tasks, assessments); environmental (noise, lack of resources) or personal (anxiety, depression, general lack of motivation). In reading, academically prioritized genres (articles and reviews) are considered the most problematic (theoretical and extensive, flowery language). In writing, the most complex ones were the monograph (graduation in Pedagogy) and the academic article, due to thematic and compositional aspects. Technologies sometimes are facilitators, sometimes cause fatigue and dispersion. It is concluded that the “user” of the potential of technologies has difficulty in becoming a “subject of language” in the new literacy practices (which does not exclude teachers). The relativization of the value of technologies and strategies adopted by the undergraduates to survive this moment of mediated initial training was evidenced. |
id |
UFS-5_5a23a04b0b4472a09a3a2dcd0354c548 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.ufs.emnuvens.com.br:article/17015 |
network_acronym_str |
UFS-5 |
network_name_str |
Travessias Interativas |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
HUMAN SCIENCES UNDERGRADUATES’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT ACADEMIC READING AND WRITING PRACTICES IN THE REMOTE ACADEMIC REGIMEPERCEPÇÕES DE GRADUANDOS DAS CIÊNCIAS HUMANAS SOBRE PRÁTICAS ACADÊMICAS DE LEITURA E ESCRITA NO REGIME LETIVO REMOTOLetramentos acadêmicosHiperdigitalizaçãoRegime letivo remotoAcademic literacyHyperdigitalizationRemote academic regimeIn the new circumstances imposed by the pandemic contexto, this work aimed to investigate the perception of Letters and Pedagogy students, through an online questionnaire, on the interference of hyperdigitalization of pedagogical practices in their academic literacy. Data were analyzed in the light of the Literacy Studies approach (STREET, 2009; LEA; STREET, 2006, ASSIS, 2014; CURRY; LILLIS, 2014 and others). 87% attested that the remote academic regime (RLR) negatively affected their reading ans writing practices, due to diferente factors: ergonomic (excessive hours in front of the computer); time management (high load of readings, tasks, assessments); environmental (noise, lack of resources) or personal (anxiety, depression, general lack of motivation). In reading, academically prioritized genres (articles and reviews) are considered the most problematic (theoretical and extensive, flowery language). In writing, the most complex ones were the monograph (graduation in Pedagogy) and the academic article, due to thematic and compositional aspects. Technologies sometimes are facilitators, sometimes cause fatigue and dispersion. It is concluded that the “user” of the potential of technologies has difficulty in becoming a “subject of language” in the new literacy practices (which does not exclude teachers). The relativization of the value of technologies and strategies adopted by the undergraduates to survive this moment of mediated initial training was evidenced.Nas novas circunstâncias impostas pelo contexto pandêmico, este trabalho visou investigar a percepção de estudantes de Letras e Pedagogia, por meio de questionário on-line, sobre as interferências da hiperdigitalização das práticas pedagógicas em seu letramento acadêmico. Analisaram-se os dados à luz da abordagem dos Novos Estudos do Letramento (STREET, 2009; LEA; STREET, 2006; ASSIS, 2014; CURRY; LILLIS, 2014 e outros). 87% atestam que o regime letivo remoto (RLR) afetou negativamente suas práticas de leitura e escrita, por fatores diversos: ergonômicos (excesso de horas diante do computador); gestão do tempo (carga elevada de leituras, tarefas, avaliações), ambientais (barulho, falta de recursos) ou pessoais (ansiedade, depressão, desmotivação geral). Na leitura, gêneros academicamente priorizados (artigos e resenhas) são considerados os mais problemáticos (teóricos e extensos, linguagem rebuscada). Na escrita, os tidos como mais complexos foram a monografia (graduação da Pedagogia) e o artigo acadêmico, por aspectos temáticos e composicionais. Tecnologias ora são facilitadoras, ora causadoras de cansaço e dispersão. Conclui-se que o “usuário” das potencialidades das tecnologias tem dificuldade em tornar-se “sujeito da linguagem” nas novas práticas de letramento (o que não exclui os docentes). Evidenciou-se a relativização do valor das tecnologias e estratégias adotadas pelos graduandos para sobreviver a este momento de formação inicial mediatizadaUniversidade Federal de Sergipe - UFS2022-01-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufs.br/Travessias/article/view/1701510.51951/ti.v11i24Travessias Interativas; No 24 (2021): Travessias Interativas → jul-dez/2021; 9-30Travessias Interativas; n. 24 (2021): Travessias Interativas → jul-dez/2021; 9-30Travessias Interativas; No. 24 (2021): Travessias Interativas → jul-dez/2021; 9-30Travessias Interativas; Núm. 24 (2021): Travessias Interativas → jul-dez/2021; 9-302236-740310.51951/ti.v11i24reponame:Travessias Interativasinstname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)instacron:UFS-porhttps://periodicos.ufs.br/Travessias/article/view/17015/12458Copyright (c) 2022 Travessias Interativasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBARROS, Ev’Ângela Batista Rodrigues de 2022-01-12T02:27:34Zoai:ojs.ufs.emnuvens.com.br:article/17015Revistahttps://seer.ufs.br/index.php/Travessias/indexPUBhttps://seer.ufs.br/index.php/Travessias/oaiale1976@academico.ufs.br2236-74032236-7403opendoar:2022-01-12T02:27:34Travessias Interativas - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
HUMAN SCIENCES UNDERGRADUATES’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT ACADEMIC READING AND WRITING PRACTICES IN THE REMOTE ACADEMIC REGIME PERCEPÇÕES DE GRADUANDOS DAS CIÊNCIAS HUMANAS SOBRE PRÁTICAS ACADÊMICAS DE LEITURA E ESCRITA NO REGIME LETIVO REMOTO |
title |
HUMAN SCIENCES UNDERGRADUATES’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT ACADEMIC READING AND WRITING PRACTICES IN THE REMOTE ACADEMIC REGIME |
spellingShingle |
HUMAN SCIENCES UNDERGRADUATES’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT ACADEMIC READING AND WRITING PRACTICES IN THE REMOTE ACADEMIC REGIME BARROS, Ev’Ângela Batista Rodrigues de Letramentos acadêmicos Hiperdigitalização Regime letivo remoto Academic literacy Hyperdigitalization Remote academic regime |
title_short |
HUMAN SCIENCES UNDERGRADUATES’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT ACADEMIC READING AND WRITING PRACTICES IN THE REMOTE ACADEMIC REGIME |
title_full |
HUMAN SCIENCES UNDERGRADUATES’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT ACADEMIC READING AND WRITING PRACTICES IN THE REMOTE ACADEMIC REGIME |
title_fullStr |
HUMAN SCIENCES UNDERGRADUATES’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT ACADEMIC READING AND WRITING PRACTICES IN THE REMOTE ACADEMIC REGIME |
title_full_unstemmed |
HUMAN SCIENCES UNDERGRADUATES’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT ACADEMIC READING AND WRITING PRACTICES IN THE REMOTE ACADEMIC REGIME |
title_sort |
HUMAN SCIENCES UNDERGRADUATES’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT ACADEMIC READING AND WRITING PRACTICES IN THE REMOTE ACADEMIC REGIME |
author |
BARROS, Ev’Ângela Batista Rodrigues de |
author_facet |
BARROS, Ev’Ângela Batista Rodrigues de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
BARROS, Ev’Ângela Batista Rodrigues de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Letramentos acadêmicos Hiperdigitalização Regime letivo remoto Academic literacy Hyperdigitalization Remote academic regime |
topic |
Letramentos acadêmicos Hiperdigitalização Regime letivo remoto Academic literacy Hyperdigitalization Remote academic regime |
description |
In the new circumstances imposed by the pandemic contexto, this work aimed to investigate the perception of Letters and Pedagogy students, through an online questionnaire, on the interference of hyperdigitalization of pedagogical practices in their academic literacy. Data were analyzed in the light of the Literacy Studies approach (STREET, 2009; LEA; STREET, 2006, ASSIS, 2014; CURRY; LILLIS, 2014 and others). 87% attested that the remote academic regime (RLR) negatively affected their reading ans writing practices, due to diferente factors: ergonomic (excessive hours in front of the computer); time management (high load of readings, tasks, assessments); environmental (noise, lack of resources) or personal (anxiety, depression, general lack of motivation). In reading, academically prioritized genres (articles and reviews) are considered the most problematic (theoretical and extensive, flowery language). In writing, the most complex ones were the monograph (graduation in Pedagogy) and the academic article, due to thematic and compositional aspects. Technologies sometimes are facilitators, sometimes cause fatigue and dispersion. It is concluded that the “user” of the potential of technologies has difficulty in becoming a “subject of language” in the new literacy practices (which does not exclude teachers). The relativization of the value of technologies and strategies adopted by the undergraduates to survive this moment of mediated initial training was evidenced. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufs.br/Travessias/article/view/17015 10.51951/ti.v11i24 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufs.br/Travessias/article/view/17015 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.51951/ti.v11i24 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufs.br/Travessias/article/view/17015/12458 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Travessias Interativas info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Travessias Interativas |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe - UFS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe - UFS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Travessias Interativas; No 24 (2021): Travessias Interativas → jul-dez/2021; 9-30 Travessias Interativas; n. 24 (2021): Travessias Interativas → jul-dez/2021; 9-30 Travessias Interativas; No. 24 (2021): Travessias Interativas → jul-dez/2021; 9-30 Travessias Interativas; Núm. 24 (2021): Travessias Interativas → jul-dez/2021; 9-30 2236-7403 10.51951/ti.v11i24 reponame:Travessias Interativas instname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) instacron:UFS- |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) |
instacron_str |
UFS- |
institution |
UFS- |
reponame_str |
Travessias Interativas |
collection |
Travessias Interativas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Travessias Interativas - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ale1976@academico.ufs.br |
_version_ |
1798328416524566528 |