The judiciary in a free society

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Morgado, Miguel
Data de Publicação: 2006
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Katálysis (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/S1414-49802006000100008
Resumo: There is increasing debate about the “crisis of the judiciary”, although in modern societies this expression (independent from its concrete content) specifically designates the crises of liberal democratic justice, or, it could be said, the crises of the judiciary in liberal and democratic society. Thus, any discussion about the “crisis of the judiciary” appears to demand a contextual framing that helps to clarify the place occupied by the judicial branch in societies such as ours. This article seeks to elucidate this context, from the political and constitutional point of view. The perspective of the History of Political Thinking is considered the most useful, to the degree to which it points to the origin of the intellectual foundation not only of modern judicial power, but of modern society as a whole. In this article, John Locke and Montesquieu are presented as two essential authors because they have made an indelible contribution to this dual structure.
id UFSC-10_c3603d802304e0aa33c53c8fa30fe510
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/5947
network_acronym_str UFSC-10
network_name_str Revista Katálysis (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The judiciary in a free societyO poder judicial na sociedade livreThere is increasing debate about the “crisis of the judiciary”, although in modern societies this expression (independent from its concrete content) specifically designates the crises of liberal democratic justice, or, it could be said, the crises of the judiciary in liberal and democratic society. Thus, any discussion about the “crisis of the judiciary” appears to demand a contextual framing that helps to clarify the place occupied by the judicial branch in societies such as ours. This article seeks to elucidate this context, from the political and constitutional point of view. The perspective of the History of Political Thinking is considered the most useful, to the degree to which it points to the origin of the intellectual foundation not only of modern judicial power, but of modern society as a whole. In this article, John Locke and Montesquieu are presented as two essential authors because they have made an indelible contribution to this dual structure.Nos dias atuais multiplicam-se as discussões em torno da “crise da justiça”. Porém, nas sociedades modernas esta expressão (independentemente do seu conteúdo concreto) designa especificamente a crise da justiça democrática e liberal ou, pode-se ainda dizer, a crise do poder judicial na sociedade democrática e liberal. Assim, qualquer discussão acerca da “crise da justiça” parece exigir um enquadramento contextual que ajude a clarificar o lugar ocupado pelo poder judicial em sociedades como as nossas. O propósito deste artigo consiste em contribuir para elucidar qual é, do ponto de vista político e constitucional, esse contexto. A perspectiva da História do Pensamento Político é considerada como a mais útil, na medida em que permite aceder à origem dos fundamentos intelectuais que estruturam não só o poder judicial moderno, mas a sociedade moderna como um todo. Neste artigo, John Locke e Montesquieu aparecem como dois autores incontornáveis por terem dado um contributo indelével para essa dupla estruturação.Revista KatálysisRevista KatálysisRevista Katálysis2006-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/S1414-4980200600010000810.1590/S1414-49802006000100008Revista Katálysis; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2006): Poder judiciário cultura e sociedade; 75-84Revista Katálysis; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2006): Poder judiciário cultura e sociedade; 75-84Revista Katálysis; v. 9 n. 1 (2006): Poder judiciário cultura e sociedade; 75-841982-02591414-4980reponame:Revista Katálysis (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/S1414-49802006000100008/5480Copyright (c) 2020 Miguel Morgadoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMorgado, Miguel2020-01-28T09:48:39Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/5947Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/oairevistakatalysis@gmail.com || kataly@cse.ufsc.br || revistakatalysis@hotmail.com1982-02591414-4980opendoar:2020-01-28T09:48:39Revista Katálysis (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The judiciary in a free society
O poder judicial na sociedade livre
title The judiciary in a free society
spellingShingle The judiciary in a free society
Morgado, Miguel
title_short The judiciary in a free society
title_full The judiciary in a free society
title_fullStr The judiciary in a free society
title_full_unstemmed The judiciary in a free society
title_sort The judiciary in a free society
author Morgado, Miguel
author_facet Morgado, Miguel
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Morgado, Miguel
description There is increasing debate about the “crisis of the judiciary”, although in modern societies this expression (independent from its concrete content) specifically designates the crises of liberal democratic justice, or, it could be said, the crises of the judiciary in liberal and democratic society. Thus, any discussion about the “crisis of the judiciary” appears to demand a contextual framing that helps to clarify the place occupied by the judicial branch in societies such as ours. This article seeks to elucidate this context, from the political and constitutional point of view. The perspective of the History of Political Thinking is considered the most useful, to the degree to which it points to the origin of the intellectual foundation not only of modern judicial power, but of modern society as a whole. In this article, John Locke and Montesquieu are presented as two essential authors because they have made an indelible contribution to this dual structure.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-04-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/S1414-49802006000100008
10.1590/S1414-49802006000100008
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/S1414-49802006000100008
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1414-49802006000100008
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/S1414-49802006000100008/5480
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Miguel Morgado
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Miguel Morgado
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Katálysis
Revista Katálysis
Revista Katálysis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Katálysis
Revista Katálysis
Revista Katálysis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Katálysis; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2006): Poder judiciário cultura e sociedade; 75-84
Revista Katálysis; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2006): Poder judiciário cultura e sociedade; 75-84
Revista Katálysis; v. 9 n. 1 (2006): Poder judiciário cultura e sociedade; 75-84
1982-0259
1414-4980
reponame:Revista Katálysis (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista Katálysis (Online)
collection Revista Katálysis (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Katálysis (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistakatalysis@gmail.com || kataly@cse.ufsc.br || revistakatalysis@hotmail.com
_version_ 1789434933211561984