The judiciary in a free society
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Katálysis (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/S1414-49802006000100008 |
Resumo: | There is increasing debate about the “crisis of the judiciary”, although in modern societies this expression (independent from its concrete content) specifically designates the crises of liberal democratic justice, or, it could be said, the crises of the judiciary in liberal and democratic society. Thus, any discussion about the “crisis of the judiciary” appears to demand a contextual framing that helps to clarify the place occupied by the judicial branch in societies such as ours. This article seeks to elucidate this context, from the political and constitutional point of view. The perspective of the History of Political Thinking is considered the most useful, to the degree to which it points to the origin of the intellectual foundation not only of modern judicial power, but of modern society as a whole. In this article, John Locke and Montesquieu are presented as two essential authors because they have made an indelible contribution to this dual structure. |
id |
UFSC-10_c3603d802304e0aa33c53c8fa30fe510 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/5947 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-10 |
network_name_str |
Revista Katálysis (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The judiciary in a free societyO poder judicial na sociedade livreThere is increasing debate about the “crisis of the judiciary”, although in modern societies this expression (independent from its concrete content) specifically designates the crises of liberal democratic justice, or, it could be said, the crises of the judiciary in liberal and democratic society. Thus, any discussion about the “crisis of the judiciary” appears to demand a contextual framing that helps to clarify the place occupied by the judicial branch in societies such as ours. This article seeks to elucidate this context, from the political and constitutional point of view. The perspective of the History of Political Thinking is considered the most useful, to the degree to which it points to the origin of the intellectual foundation not only of modern judicial power, but of modern society as a whole. In this article, John Locke and Montesquieu are presented as two essential authors because they have made an indelible contribution to this dual structure.Nos dias atuais multiplicam-se as discussões em torno da “crise da justiça”. Porém, nas sociedades modernas esta expressão (independentemente do seu conteúdo concreto) designa especificamente a crise da justiça democrática e liberal ou, pode-se ainda dizer, a crise do poder judicial na sociedade democrática e liberal. Assim, qualquer discussão acerca da “crise da justiça” parece exigir um enquadramento contextual que ajude a clarificar o lugar ocupado pelo poder judicial em sociedades como as nossas. O propósito deste artigo consiste em contribuir para elucidar qual é, do ponto de vista político e constitucional, esse contexto. A perspectiva da História do Pensamento Político é considerada como a mais útil, na medida em que permite aceder à origem dos fundamentos intelectuais que estruturam não só o poder judicial moderno, mas a sociedade moderna como um todo. Neste artigo, John Locke e Montesquieu aparecem como dois autores incontornáveis por terem dado um contributo indelével para essa dupla estruturação.Revista KatálysisRevista KatálysisRevista Katálysis2006-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/S1414-4980200600010000810.1590/S1414-49802006000100008Revista Katálysis; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2006): Poder judiciário cultura e sociedade; 75-84Revista Katálysis; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2006): Poder judiciário cultura e sociedade; 75-84Revista Katálysis; v. 9 n. 1 (2006): Poder judiciário cultura e sociedade; 75-841982-02591414-4980reponame:Revista Katálysis (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/S1414-49802006000100008/5480Copyright (c) 2020 Miguel Morgadoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMorgado, Miguel2020-01-28T09:48:39Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/5947Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/oairevistakatalysis@gmail.com || kataly@cse.ufsc.br || revistakatalysis@hotmail.com1982-02591414-4980opendoar:2020-01-28T09:48:39Revista Katálysis (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The judiciary in a free society O poder judicial na sociedade livre |
title |
The judiciary in a free society |
spellingShingle |
The judiciary in a free society Morgado, Miguel |
title_short |
The judiciary in a free society |
title_full |
The judiciary in a free society |
title_fullStr |
The judiciary in a free society |
title_full_unstemmed |
The judiciary in a free society |
title_sort |
The judiciary in a free society |
author |
Morgado, Miguel |
author_facet |
Morgado, Miguel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Morgado, Miguel |
description |
There is increasing debate about the “crisis of the judiciary”, although in modern societies this expression (independent from its concrete content) specifically designates the crises of liberal democratic justice, or, it could be said, the crises of the judiciary in liberal and democratic society. Thus, any discussion about the “crisis of the judiciary” appears to demand a contextual framing that helps to clarify the place occupied by the judicial branch in societies such as ours. This article seeks to elucidate this context, from the political and constitutional point of view. The perspective of the History of Political Thinking is considered the most useful, to the degree to which it points to the origin of the intellectual foundation not only of modern judicial power, but of modern society as a whole. In this article, John Locke and Montesquieu are presented as two essential authors because they have made an indelible contribution to this dual structure. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-04-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/S1414-49802006000100008 10.1590/S1414-49802006000100008 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/S1414-49802006000100008 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1414-49802006000100008 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/S1414-49802006000100008/5480 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Miguel Morgado info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Miguel Morgado |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Katálysis Revista Katálysis Revista Katálysis |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Katálysis Revista Katálysis Revista Katálysis |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Katálysis; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2006): Poder judiciário cultura e sociedade; 75-84 Revista Katálysis; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2006): Poder judiciário cultura e sociedade; 75-84 Revista Katálysis; v. 9 n. 1 (2006): Poder judiciário cultura e sociedade; 75-84 1982-0259 1414-4980 reponame:Revista Katálysis (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Revista Katálysis (Online) |
collection |
Revista Katálysis (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Katálysis (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistakatalysis@gmail.com || kataly@cse.ufsc.br || revistakatalysis@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1789434933211561984 |