Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rosendo, Daniela
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Kuhnen, Tânia Aparecida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: INTERthesis
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p16
Resumo: Karen J. Warren presents an ecofeminist ethical perspective, according to which contextual aspects must be considered in the analysis of moral problems and moral situations. Therefore, she rejects the ethical monism of the main animal ethics theories. The aim of this article is to demonstrate, in the light of the notion of vulnerability (proposed as a criterion for moral considerability by Paul Taylor), that Warren’s care-sensitive ethics cannot be considered as a genuine environmental ethical theory. It rather comes near Gary Snyder’s bioregionalism and does not explain in which way a moral consideration is attributed to individual animals. In addition, the article seeks to analyze her possible moral relativism: according to the criteria of James Rachels and Peter Singer, Warren’s proposal does not seem to meet the requirements of an impartial and general ethical theory, and may submit the problems of relativism since her conception of care is limited.
id UFSC-13_89ca7df0c1a38a58328232ccb3969215
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/38985
network_acronym_str UFSC-13
network_name_str INTERthesis
repository_id_str
spelling Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics?La ética ecofeminista de Karren Warren: un modelo de ética ambiental genuina?A ética ecofeminista de Karen J. Warren: um modelo de ética ambiental genuína?Karen J. Warren presents an ecofeminist ethical perspective, according to which contextual aspects must be considered in the analysis of moral problems and moral situations. Therefore, she rejects the ethical monism of the main animal ethics theories. The aim of this article is to demonstrate, in the light of the notion of vulnerability (proposed as a criterion for moral considerability by Paul Taylor), that Warren’s care-sensitive ethics cannot be considered as a genuine environmental ethical theory. It rather comes near Gary Snyder’s bioregionalism and does not explain in which way a moral consideration is attributed to individual animals. In addition, the article seeks to analyze her possible moral relativism: according to the criteria of James Rachels and Peter Singer, Warren’s proposal does not seem to meet the requirements of an impartial and general ethical theory, and may submit the problems of relativism since her conception of care is limited.Karen J. Warren presenta una propuesta ética ecofeminista, según la cual los contextos necesitan ser tomados en consideración en el análisis de situaciones y problemas morales, rechazándose el monismo ético de las corrientes principales de la ética animal. El objetivo del presente artículo es mostrar, a la luz de la noción de vulnerabilidad, criterio de considerabilidad moral propuesto por Paul Taylor, que la ética sensible al cuidado propuesta por Warren no puede ser considerada una ética ambiental genuina, pues se aproxima del biorregionalismo de Gary Snyder y no esclarece de qué manera la consideración moral es atribuida a los animales individualmente. Al analizarse la cuestión del relativismo moral, según los criterios de James Rachels y Peter Singer, la propuesta de Warren parece no cumplir con los requisitos de una ética imparcial y general, y puede incurrir en los problemas del relativismo, una vez que la concepción de cuidado de la autora es limitada.Karen J. Warren apresenta uma proposta ética ecofeminista, segundo a qual os contextos precisam ler levados em consideração na análise de situações e problemas morais, rejeitando-se o monismo ético das correntes principais de ética animal. O objetivo deste artigo é mostrar, à luz da noção de vulnerabilidade, critério de considerabilidade moral proposto por Paul Taylor, que a ética sensível ao cuidado de Warren pode não ser considerada uma ética ambiental genuína, à medida que se aproxima do biorregionalismo de Gary Snyder e não esclarece de que forma a consideração moral é atribuída aos animais individualmente. Quanto ao relativismo, segundo os critérios de James Rachels e Peter Singer, a proposta de Warren parece não cumprir com os requisitos de uma ética imparcial e geral, e pode incorrer nos problemas do relativismo, uma vez que a concepção de cuidado da autora é limitada. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2015-07-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p1610.5007/1807-1384.2015v12n1p16Interdisciplinary International Journal - INTERthesis; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2015); 16-41Revista Internacional Interdisciplinaria INTERthesis; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2015); 16-41Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis; v. 12 n. 1 (2015); 16-411807-1384reponame:INTERthesisinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p16/29651Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRosendo, DanielaKuhnen, Tânia Aparecida2024-03-15T08:46:38Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/38985Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/oaiinterthesis@gmail.com||interthesis@cfh.ufsc.br||cimbalista@uol.com.br1807-13841807-1384opendoar:2024-03-15T08:46:38INTERthesis - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics?
La ética ecofeminista de Karren Warren: un modelo de ética ambiental genuina?
A ética ecofeminista de Karen J. Warren: um modelo de ética ambiental genuína?
title Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics?
spellingShingle Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics?
Rosendo, Daniela
title_short Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics?
title_full Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics?
title_fullStr Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics?
title_full_unstemmed Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics?
title_sort Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics?
author Rosendo, Daniela
author_facet Rosendo, Daniela
Kuhnen, Tânia Aparecida
author_role author
author2 Kuhnen, Tânia Aparecida
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rosendo, Daniela
Kuhnen, Tânia Aparecida
description Karen J. Warren presents an ecofeminist ethical perspective, according to which contextual aspects must be considered in the analysis of moral problems and moral situations. Therefore, she rejects the ethical monism of the main animal ethics theories. The aim of this article is to demonstrate, in the light of the notion of vulnerability (proposed as a criterion for moral considerability by Paul Taylor), that Warren’s care-sensitive ethics cannot be considered as a genuine environmental ethical theory. It rather comes near Gary Snyder’s bioregionalism and does not explain in which way a moral consideration is attributed to individual animals. In addition, the article seeks to analyze her possible moral relativism: according to the criteria of James Rachels and Peter Singer, Warren’s proposal does not seem to meet the requirements of an impartial and general ethical theory, and may submit the problems of relativism since her conception of care is limited.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-07-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p16
10.5007/1807-1384.2015v12n1p16
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p16
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1807-1384.2015v12n1p16
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p16/29651
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Interdisciplinary International Journal - INTERthesis; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2015); 16-41
Revista Internacional Interdisciplinaria INTERthesis; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2015); 16-41
Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis; v. 12 n. 1 (2015); 16-41
1807-1384
reponame:INTERthesis
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str INTERthesis
collection INTERthesis
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTERthesis - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv interthesis@gmail.com||interthesis@cfh.ufsc.br||cimbalista@uol.com.br
_version_ 1805392705045397504