Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | INTERthesis |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p16 |
Resumo: | Karen J. Warren presents an ecofeminist ethical perspective, according to which contextual aspects must be considered in the analysis of moral problems and moral situations. Therefore, she rejects the ethical monism of the main animal ethics theories. The aim of this article is to demonstrate, in the light of the notion of vulnerability (proposed as a criterion for moral considerability by Paul Taylor), that Warren’s care-sensitive ethics cannot be considered as a genuine environmental ethical theory. It rather comes near Gary Snyder’s bioregionalism and does not explain in which way a moral consideration is attributed to individual animals. In addition, the article seeks to analyze her possible moral relativism: according to the criteria of James Rachels and Peter Singer, Warren’s proposal does not seem to meet the requirements of an impartial and general ethical theory, and may submit the problems of relativism since her conception of care is limited. |
id |
UFSC-13_89ca7df0c1a38a58328232ccb3969215 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/38985 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-13 |
network_name_str |
INTERthesis |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics?La ética ecofeminista de Karren Warren: un modelo de ética ambiental genuina?A ética ecofeminista de Karen J. Warren: um modelo de ética ambiental genuína?Karen J. Warren presents an ecofeminist ethical perspective, according to which contextual aspects must be considered in the analysis of moral problems and moral situations. Therefore, she rejects the ethical monism of the main animal ethics theories. The aim of this article is to demonstrate, in the light of the notion of vulnerability (proposed as a criterion for moral considerability by Paul Taylor), that Warren’s care-sensitive ethics cannot be considered as a genuine environmental ethical theory. It rather comes near Gary Snyder’s bioregionalism and does not explain in which way a moral consideration is attributed to individual animals. In addition, the article seeks to analyze her possible moral relativism: according to the criteria of James Rachels and Peter Singer, Warren’s proposal does not seem to meet the requirements of an impartial and general ethical theory, and may submit the problems of relativism since her conception of care is limited.Karen J. Warren presenta una propuesta ética ecofeminista, según la cual los contextos necesitan ser tomados en consideración en el análisis de situaciones y problemas morales, rechazándose el monismo ético de las corrientes principales de la ética animal. El objetivo del presente artículo es mostrar, a la luz de la noción de vulnerabilidad, criterio de considerabilidad moral propuesto por Paul Taylor, que la ética sensible al cuidado propuesta por Warren no puede ser considerada una ética ambiental genuina, pues se aproxima del biorregionalismo de Gary Snyder y no esclarece de qué manera la consideración moral es atribuida a los animales individualmente. Al analizarse la cuestión del relativismo moral, según los criterios de James Rachels y Peter Singer, la propuesta de Warren parece no cumplir con los requisitos de una ética imparcial y general, y puede incurrir en los problemas del relativismo, una vez que la concepción de cuidado de la autora es limitada.Karen J. Warren apresenta uma proposta ética ecofeminista, segundo a qual os contextos precisam ler levados em consideração na análise de situações e problemas morais, rejeitando-se o monismo ético das correntes principais de ética animal. O objetivo deste artigo é mostrar, à luz da noção de vulnerabilidade, critério de considerabilidade moral proposto por Paul Taylor, que a ética sensível ao cuidado de Warren pode não ser considerada uma ética ambiental genuína, à medida que se aproxima do biorregionalismo de Gary Snyder e não esclarece de que forma a consideração moral é atribuída aos animais individualmente. Quanto ao relativismo, segundo os critérios de James Rachels e Peter Singer, a proposta de Warren parece não cumprir com os requisitos de uma ética imparcial e geral, e pode incorrer nos problemas do relativismo, uma vez que a concepção de cuidado da autora é limitada. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2015-07-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p1610.5007/1807-1384.2015v12n1p16Interdisciplinary International Journal - INTERthesis; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2015); 16-41Revista Internacional Interdisciplinaria INTERthesis; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2015); 16-41Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis; v. 12 n. 1 (2015); 16-411807-1384reponame:INTERthesisinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p16/29651Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRosendo, DanielaKuhnen, Tânia Aparecida2024-03-15T08:46:38Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/38985Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/oaiinterthesis@gmail.com||interthesis@cfh.ufsc.br||cimbalista@uol.com.br1807-13841807-1384opendoar:2024-03-15T08:46:38INTERthesis - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics? La ética ecofeminista de Karren Warren: un modelo de ética ambiental genuina? A ética ecofeminista de Karen J. Warren: um modelo de ética ambiental genuína? |
title |
Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics? |
spellingShingle |
Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics? Rosendo, Daniela |
title_short |
Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics? |
title_full |
Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics? |
title_fullStr |
Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics? |
title_sort |
Karen Warren’s ecofeminist ethics: is it a model of genuine environmental ethics? |
author |
Rosendo, Daniela |
author_facet |
Rosendo, Daniela Kuhnen, Tânia Aparecida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kuhnen, Tânia Aparecida |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rosendo, Daniela Kuhnen, Tânia Aparecida |
description |
Karen J. Warren presents an ecofeminist ethical perspective, according to which contextual aspects must be considered in the analysis of moral problems and moral situations. Therefore, she rejects the ethical monism of the main animal ethics theories. The aim of this article is to demonstrate, in the light of the notion of vulnerability (proposed as a criterion for moral considerability by Paul Taylor), that Warren’s care-sensitive ethics cannot be considered as a genuine environmental ethical theory. It rather comes near Gary Snyder’s bioregionalism and does not explain in which way a moral consideration is attributed to individual animals. In addition, the article seeks to analyze her possible moral relativism: according to the criteria of James Rachels and Peter Singer, Warren’s proposal does not seem to meet the requirements of an impartial and general ethical theory, and may submit the problems of relativism since her conception of care is limited. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-07-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p16 10.5007/1807-1384.2015v12n1p16 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p16 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1807-1384.2015v12n1p16 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p16/29651 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Interdisciplinary International Journal - INTERthesis; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2015); 16-41 Revista Internacional Interdisciplinaria INTERthesis; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2015); 16-41 Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis; v. 12 n. 1 (2015); 16-41 1807-1384 reponame:INTERthesis instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
INTERthesis |
collection |
INTERthesis |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTERthesis - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
interthesis@gmail.com||interthesis@cfh.ufsc.br||cimbalista@uol.com.br |
_version_ |
1805392705045397504 |