The Importance of Classics in the Formation of the Researcher: what says to us the concept of socialization, identification and intellectual field as field of power

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Teixeira, Juliana Cristina
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Zanoteli, Eduardo José, Carrieri, Alexandre de Pádua
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Ciências da Administração
DOI: 10.5007/2175-8077.2014v16n38p154
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2014v16n38p154
Resumo: The objective of this theoretical article is defend the importance of reading of the classics in the process of formation and constitution of the subject as a researcher. We construct this defense by means of theoretical approaches related to the concepts of socialization, identification (which relates to the concept of identity); and by means of Bourdieusian notion of that intellectual field is a field of power. Throughout the discussion, we analyzed how, by means of socialization, there is an influence of the structure how of the subject itself in their constitution as researcher. By means of the concept of identification, we perceive the influence of the subjectivity of the researcher subject to the identify yourself or not with the classics that reads, choosing those who will be “their” classics. And, by means of the notion of the intellectual field as a field of power, we consider the existence of a science that is not disinterested and we defend the danger of  “apuds” and reading of translations of the classics. .
id UFSC-15_3ffd8daf7ed7c742d4ad510d88c6eb51
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/27544
network_acronym_str UFSC-15
network_name_str Revista de Ciências da Administração
spelling The Importance of Classics in the Formation of the Researcher: what says to us the concept of socialization, identification and intellectual field as field of powerA Importância dos Clássicos na Formação do Pesquisador: o que nos diz os conceitos de socialização, identificação e campo intelectual como campo de poderThe objective of this theoretical article is defend the importance of reading of the classics in the process of formation and constitution of the subject as a researcher. We construct this defense by means of theoretical approaches related to the concepts of socialization, identification (which relates to the concept of identity); and by means of Bourdieusian notion of that intellectual field is a field of power. Throughout the discussion, we analyzed how, by means of socialization, there is an influence of the structure how of the subject itself in their constitution as researcher. By means of the concept of identification, we perceive the influence of the subjectivity of the researcher subject to the identify yourself or not with the classics that reads, choosing those who will be “their” classics. And, by means of the notion of the intellectual field as a field of power, we consider the existence of a science that is not disinterested and we defend the danger of  “apuds” and reading of translations of the classics. .O objetivo deste ensaio teórico é defender a importância da leitura dos clássicos no processo de formação e de constituição do sujeito como pesquisador. Constrói-se essa defesa por meio de abordagens teóricas relacionadas aos conceitos de socialização; de identificação (que se relaciona ao conceito de identidade); e por meio da noção bourdiesiana de que o campo intelectual é um campo de um poder. Ao longo da discussão, analisa-se como, por intermédio da socialização, há uma influência tanto da estrutura quanto do próprio sujeito em sua constituição como pesquisador. Por meio do conceito de identificação, percebe-se a influência da subjetividade do sujeito pesquisador ao se identificar ou não com os clássicos que lê, escolhendo aqueles que serão os “seus” clássicos. E, por meio da noção de campo intelectual como campo de poder, considera-se a existência de uma ciência que não é desinteressada e defende-se o perigo dos apuds e da leitura de traduções dos clássicos. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2014-04-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionEnsaio Teóricoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2014v16n38p15410.5007/2175-8077.2014v16n38p154Revista de Ciências da Administração; v.16 n.38 Abril 2014; 154 - 1712175-80771516-3865reponame:Revista de Ciências da Administraçãoinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2014v16n38p154/pdf_9Teixeira, Juliana CristinaZanoteli, Eduardo JoséCarrieri, Alexandre de Páduainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-06-22T14:55:02Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/27544Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/admPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/oairevista@cse.ufsc.br||mfpcris@gmail.com||rca.cse@contato.ufsc.br2175-80771516-3865opendoar:2018-06-22T14:55:02Revista de Ciências da Administração - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Importance of Classics in the Formation of the Researcher: what says to us the concept of socialization, identification and intellectual field as field of power
A Importância dos Clássicos na Formação do Pesquisador: o que nos diz os conceitos de socialização, identificação e campo intelectual como campo de poder
title The Importance of Classics in the Formation of the Researcher: what says to us the concept of socialization, identification and intellectual field as field of power
spellingShingle The Importance of Classics in the Formation of the Researcher: what says to us the concept of socialization, identification and intellectual field as field of power
The Importance of Classics in the Formation of the Researcher: what says to us the concept of socialization, identification and intellectual field as field of power
Teixeira, Juliana Cristina
Teixeira, Juliana Cristina
title_short The Importance of Classics in the Formation of the Researcher: what says to us the concept of socialization, identification and intellectual field as field of power
title_full The Importance of Classics in the Formation of the Researcher: what says to us the concept of socialization, identification and intellectual field as field of power
title_fullStr The Importance of Classics in the Formation of the Researcher: what says to us the concept of socialization, identification and intellectual field as field of power
The Importance of Classics in the Formation of the Researcher: what says to us the concept of socialization, identification and intellectual field as field of power
title_full_unstemmed The Importance of Classics in the Formation of the Researcher: what says to us the concept of socialization, identification and intellectual field as field of power
The Importance of Classics in the Formation of the Researcher: what says to us the concept of socialization, identification and intellectual field as field of power
title_sort The Importance of Classics in the Formation of the Researcher: what says to us the concept of socialization, identification and intellectual field as field of power
author Teixeira, Juliana Cristina
author_facet Teixeira, Juliana Cristina
Teixeira, Juliana Cristina
Zanoteli, Eduardo José
Carrieri, Alexandre de Pádua
Zanoteli, Eduardo José
Carrieri, Alexandre de Pádua
author_role author
author2 Zanoteli, Eduardo José
Carrieri, Alexandre de Pádua
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teixeira, Juliana Cristina
Zanoteli, Eduardo José
Carrieri, Alexandre de Pádua
description The objective of this theoretical article is defend the importance of reading of the classics in the process of formation and constitution of the subject as a researcher. We construct this defense by means of theoretical approaches related to the concepts of socialization, identification (which relates to the concept of identity); and by means of Bourdieusian notion of that intellectual field is a field of power. Throughout the discussion, we analyzed how, by means of socialization, there is an influence of the structure how of the subject itself in their constitution as researcher. By means of the concept of identification, we perceive the influence of the subjectivity of the researcher subject to the identify yourself or not with the classics that reads, choosing those who will be “their” classics. And, by means of the notion of the intellectual field as a field of power, we consider the existence of a science that is not disinterested and we defend the danger of  “apuds” and reading of translations of the classics. .
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Ensaio Teórico
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2014v16n38p154
10.5007/2175-8077.2014v16n38p154
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2014v16n38p154
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-8077.2014v16n38p154
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2014v16n38p154/pdf_9
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências da Administração; v.16 n.38 Abril 2014; 154 - 171
2175-8077
1516-3865
reponame:Revista de Ciências da Administração
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista de Ciências da Administração
collection Revista de Ciências da Administração
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências da Administração - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@cse.ufsc.br||mfpcris@gmail.com||rca.cse@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1822181411757490176
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.5007/2175-8077.2014v16n38p154

Registros relacionados