Biophotogrammetry: reliability of measurements obtained with a posture assessment software (SAPO).
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
DOI: | 10.1590/1980-0037.2011v13n4p299 |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2011v13n4p299 |
Resumo: | Photogrammetry is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and measurement of postural changes, but the lack of standardization of anatomical references and angular measures impairs the comparison between studies and compromises the reliability of the results. The objective of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intraexaminer reliability of angular measures proposed by the SAPO posture assessment software (v. 0.68). Twenty-four subjects were photographed in the standing position according to the recommendations of the SAPO software. Three examiners (A, B and C) experienced in the use of the software analyzed the images and repeated the analysis after 7 days. Variance, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and t-test adopting a level of significance of 5% were applied. With respect to interexaminer reliability among the 20 angles measured, two were classified as unacceptable (A13: ICC = 0.623; A14: ICC = 0.568), one as acceptable (A19: ICC = 0.743), one as very good (A20: ICC = 0.860), and 16 as excellent (ICC ≥ 0.90). Evaluation of repeatability of the method by the same examiner showed that two angles measured by examiner A differed significantly between the two measurements (A11: p = 0.015; A12: p = 0.026), as did two angles measured by examiner B (A2: p = 0.019; A12: p = 0.015) and one angle measured by examiner C (A16, p = 0.011). In conclusion, comparison between different examiners showed that the angles proposed by the SAPO protocol are reliable for the measurement of body segments. |
id |
UFSC-16_1fa3bcf4c5d81d9f06760d1685aca32f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/11235 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-16 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
spelling |
Biophotogrammetry: reliability of measurements obtained with a posture assessment software (SAPO).Biofotogrametria confiabilidade das medidas do protocolo do software para avaliação postural (SAPO)Photogrammetry is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and measurement of postural changes, but the lack of standardization of anatomical references and angular measures impairs the comparison between studies and compromises the reliability of the results. The objective of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intraexaminer reliability of angular measures proposed by the SAPO posture assessment software (v. 0.68). Twenty-four subjects were photographed in the standing position according to the recommendations of the SAPO software. Three examiners (A, B and C) experienced in the use of the software analyzed the images and repeated the analysis after 7 days. Variance, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and t-test adopting a level of significance of 5% were applied. With respect to interexaminer reliability among the 20 angles measured, two were classified as unacceptable (A13: ICC = 0.623; A14: ICC = 0.568), one as acceptable (A19: ICC = 0.743), one as very good (A20: ICC = 0.860), and 16 as excellent (ICC ≥ 0.90). Evaluation of repeatability of the method by the same examiner showed that two angles measured by examiner A differed significantly between the two measurements (A11: p = 0.015; A12: p = 0.026), as did two angles measured by examiner B (A2: p = 0.019; A12: p = 0.015) and one angle measured by examiner C (A16, p = 0.011). In conclusion, comparison between different examiners showed that the angles proposed by the SAPO protocol are reliable for the measurement of body segments.A fotogrametria vem sendo utilizada como um valioso recurso diagnóstico para a verificação e mensuração de alterações posturais, porém a ausência de padronização das referências anatômicas, dos ângulos obtidos entre estas e sua significância dificulta a comparação entre estudos e a confiabilidade dos resultados encontrados. O objetivo do estudo foi verificar a confiabilidade inter e intra-examinadores das medidas angulares propostas pelo software de avaliação postural SAPO v. 0.68. Participaram do estudo 24 sujeitos, os quais foram fotografados na postura em pé, seguindo as recomendações do SAPO. Três avaliadores (A, B e C) experientes no uso do programa analisaram as imagens, repetindo essa análise sete dias após. A variância, o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (ICC) e teste T com nível significância de 5% foram aplicados. Resultados indicaram que na confiabilidade interexaminadores dos 20 ângulos mensurados, dois foram classificados como não aceitáveis (A13: ICC=0,623 e A14: ICC=0,568), um como aceitável (A19: ICC=0,743), um como muito bom (A20: ICC=0,860) e 16 como excelentes (ICC ≥ 0,90). Na avaliação da repetibilidade do método, por um mesmo avaliador, dois ângulos mensurados pelo examinador A foram significativamente diferentes em duas medidas (A11:p=0,015; A12:p=0,026); também dois ângulos pelo examinador B (A2:p=0,019; A12:p=0,015) e um ângulo pelo examinador C (A16;p=0,011). Concluíu-se que os ângulos propostos pelo protocolo SAPO mostraram-se confiáveis após avaliação entre diferentes examinadores para mensurar os segmentos corporais.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2011-06-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares",Avaliado por Paresexperimentalapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2011v13n4p29910.1590/1980-0037.2011v13n4p299Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 13 No. 4 (2011); 299-305Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 13 n. 4 (2011); 299-3051980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCengporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2011v13n4p299/17905https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2011v13n4p299/17904Souza, Juliana AlvesPasinato, FernandaBasso, DéboraCorrêa, Eliane Castilhos Rodriguesda Silva, Ana Maria Tonioloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-21T14:14:51Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/11235Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2022-11-21T14:14:51Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Biophotogrammetry: reliability of measurements obtained with a posture assessment software (SAPO). Biofotogrametria confiabilidade das medidas do protocolo do software para avaliação postural (SAPO) |
title |
Biophotogrammetry: reliability of measurements obtained with a posture assessment software (SAPO). |
spellingShingle |
Biophotogrammetry: reliability of measurements obtained with a posture assessment software (SAPO). Biophotogrammetry: reliability of measurements obtained with a posture assessment software (SAPO). Souza, Juliana Alves Souza, Juliana Alves |
title_short |
Biophotogrammetry: reliability of measurements obtained with a posture assessment software (SAPO). |
title_full |
Biophotogrammetry: reliability of measurements obtained with a posture assessment software (SAPO). |
title_fullStr |
Biophotogrammetry: reliability of measurements obtained with a posture assessment software (SAPO). Biophotogrammetry: reliability of measurements obtained with a posture assessment software (SAPO). |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biophotogrammetry: reliability of measurements obtained with a posture assessment software (SAPO). Biophotogrammetry: reliability of measurements obtained with a posture assessment software (SAPO). |
title_sort |
Biophotogrammetry: reliability of measurements obtained with a posture assessment software (SAPO). |
author |
Souza, Juliana Alves |
author_facet |
Souza, Juliana Alves Souza, Juliana Alves Pasinato, Fernanda Basso, Débora Corrêa, Eliane Castilhos Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Maria Toniolo Pasinato, Fernanda Basso, Débora Corrêa, Eliane Castilhos Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Maria Toniolo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pasinato, Fernanda Basso, Débora Corrêa, Eliane Castilhos Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Maria Toniolo |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Juliana Alves Pasinato, Fernanda Basso, Débora Corrêa, Eliane Castilhos Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Maria Toniolo |
description |
Photogrammetry is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and measurement of postural changes, but the lack of standardization of anatomical references and angular measures impairs the comparison between studies and compromises the reliability of the results. The objective of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intraexaminer reliability of angular measures proposed by the SAPO posture assessment software (v. 0.68). Twenty-four subjects were photographed in the standing position according to the recommendations of the SAPO software. Three examiners (A, B and C) experienced in the use of the software analyzed the images and repeated the analysis after 7 days. Variance, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and t-test adopting a level of significance of 5% were applied. With respect to interexaminer reliability among the 20 angles measured, two were classified as unacceptable (A13: ICC = 0.623; A14: ICC = 0.568), one as acceptable (A19: ICC = 0.743), one as very good (A20: ICC = 0.860), and 16 as excellent (ICC ≥ 0.90). Evaluation of repeatability of the method by the same examiner showed that two angles measured by examiner A differed significantly between the two measurements (A11: p = 0.015; A12: p = 0.026), as did two angles measured by examiner B (A2: p = 0.019; A12: p = 0.015) and one angle measured by examiner C (A16, p = 0.011). In conclusion, comparison between different examiners showed that the angles proposed by the SAPO protocol are reliable for the measurement of body segments. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-06-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Avaliado por Pares", Avaliado por Pares experimental |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2011v13n4p299 10.1590/1980-0037.2011v13n4p299 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2011v13n4p299 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-0037.2011v13n4p299 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2011v13n4p299/17905 https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2011v13n4p299/17904 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 13 No. 4 (2011); 299-305 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 13 n. 4 (2011); 299-305 1980-0037 1415-8426 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1822181393122197504 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-0037.2011v13n4p299 |