Evolution of perceived exertion concepts and mechanisms: a literature review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Gleber
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Souza, Douglas Martins de, Reichert, Felipe Fossati, Smirmaul, Bruno Paula Caraça
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n5p579
Resumo: The mechanisms and concepts of perceived exertion have changed over the years. Thus, the objectives of the present literature review were i) to investigate the literature reviews that have been published since 1982 and to describe the proposed causal mechanisms of perceived exertion, and ii) to determine whether the concepts of perceived exertion have accompanied the changes of its proposed mechanisms. Searches were per-formed in PubMed, Science Direct and Scielo using the terms ‘rating of perceived exertion and review’ and ‘perceived exertion and review’. Eighteen papers whose main objective was to determine the overall perceived exertion during physical exercise were included in the present study. It was observed that, despite the existence of the early corollary discharge theory, after Borg’s propositions most of the literature has explained perceived exertion using the afferent feedback theory based on correlational studies. It was only in 2009 that there was a resurgence of the original corollary discharge theory in perceived exertion papers. Most of the perceived exertion concepts are related to the afferent feedback mechanism, using constructs such as physiological responses, stress, discomfort and pain. However, these constructs are incongruent with the corollary discharge theory, presenting physiological mechanisms that differ from those of perceived exertion. Therefore, Borg’s studies have influenced contemporary views of the mechanisms and concepts of perceived exertion. Over the years, additional constructs have been incorporated into the original Borg’s concept, although always on the basis of the afferent feedback theory.
id UFSC-16_857aad487dcd7d4303dd7edee9707436
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/31216
network_acronym_str UFSC-16
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evolution of perceived exertion concepts and mechanisms: a literature reviewEvolução dos conceitos e mecanismos da percepção de esforço: uma revisão de literaturaThe mechanisms and concepts of perceived exertion have changed over the years. Thus, the objectives of the present literature review were i) to investigate the literature reviews that have been published since 1982 and to describe the proposed causal mechanisms of perceived exertion, and ii) to determine whether the concepts of perceived exertion have accompanied the changes of its proposed mechanisms. Searches were per-formed in PubMed, Science Direct and Scielo using the terms ‘rating of perceived exertion and review’ and ‘perceived exertion and review’. Eighteen papers whose main objective was to determine the overall perceived exertion during physical exercise were included in the present study. It was observed that, despite the existence of the early corollary discharge theory, after Borg’s propositions most of the literature has explained perceived exertion using the afferent feedback theory based on correlational studies. It was only in 2009 that there was a resurgence of the original corollary discharge theory in perceived exertion papers. Most of the perceived exertion concepts are related to the afferent feedback mechanism, using constructs such as physiological responses, stress, discomfort and pain. However, these constructs are incongruent with the corollary discharge theory, presenting physiological mechanisms that differ from those of perceived exertion. Therefore, Borg’s studies have influenced contemporary views of the mechanisms and concepts of perceived exertion. Over the years, additional constructs have been incorporated into the original Borg’s concept, although always on the basis of the afferent feedback theory.Os mecanismos e conceitos da percepção de esforço têm mudado ao longo do tempo. Assim, este artigo de revisão de literatura tem por objetivos: i) investigar as revisões de literatura publicadas a partir de 1982, descrevendo os mecanismos causais de geração da percepção de esforço relatados e; ii) verificar se os conceitos da percepção de esforço acompanharam as mudanças que ocorreram acerca dos seus mecanismos causais. Foram realizadas buscas nas bases de dados PubMed, Science Direct e Scielo com os termos “rate perceivedexertionandreview” e “perceivedexertionandreview”. No total, foram incluídos 18 artigos, que tiveram como objetivo principal a percepção geral de esforço em exercício físico. Apesar da antiga existência da teoria do Disparo corolário para explicar os mecanismos causais da percepção de esforço, verifica-se que, após as proposições de Borg, a maior parte da literatura descreve a percepção de esforço através do mecanismo de Feedback aferente, baseada em estudos correlacionais. Apenas em 2009, a teoria original do Disparo corolário reaparece. Quanto aos conceitos, a maioria deles remete ao mecanismo de feedback aferente, utilizando-se de constructos como respostas fisiológicas, estresse, desconforto e dor, que são incongruentes com a teoria do Disparo corolário e apresentam mecanismos distintos aos da percepção de esforço. Portanto, verificou-se que os estudos de Borg influenciaram nos mecanismos e conceitos contemporâneos da percepção de esforço. Com o passar do tempo, houve incorporação de constructos no conceito original de Borg, porém, sempre embasado na teoria do Feedback aferente.  Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2014-08-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares","Artigo Solicitado""Avaliado por Pares", "Artigo Solicitado"Revisão de Literaturainfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n5p57910.1590/1980-0037.2014v16n5p579Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 16 No. 5 (2014); 579-587Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 16 n. 5 (2014); 579-5871980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n5p579/27559Pereira, GleberSouza, Douglas Martins deReichert, Felipe FossatiSmirmaul, Bruno Paula Caraçainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-12-05T08:26:19Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/31216Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2018-12-05T08:26:19Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evolution of perceived exertion concepts and mechanisms: a literature review
Evolução dos conceitos e mecanismos da percepção de esforço: uma revisão de literatura
title Evolution of perceived exertion concepts and mechanisms: a literature review
spellingShingle Evolution of perceived exertion concepts and mechanisms: a literature review
Pereira, Gleber
title_short Evolution of perceived exertion concepts and mechanisms: a literature review
title_full Evolution of perceived exertion concepts and mechanisms: a literature review
title_fullStr Evolution of perceived exertion concepts and mechanisms: a literature review
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of perceived exertion concepts and mechanisms: a literature review
title_sort Evolution of perceived exertion concepts and mechanisms: a literature review
author Pereira, Gleber
author_facet Pereira, Gleber
Souza, Douglas Martins de
Reichert, Felipe Fossati
Smirmaul, Bruno Paula Caraça
author_role author
author2 Souza, Douglas Martins de
Reichert, Felipe Fossati
Smirmaul, Bruno Paula Caraça
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Gleber
Souza, Douglas Martins de
Reichert, Felipe Fossati
Smirmaul, Bruno Paula Caraça
description The mechanisms and concepts of perceived exertion have changed over the years. Thus, the objectives of the present literature review were i) to investigate the literature reviews that have been published since 1982 and to describe the proposed causal mechanisms of perceived exertion, and ii) to determine whether the concepts of perceived exertion have accompanied the changes of its proposed mechanisms. Searches were per-formed in PubMed, Science Direct and Scielo using the terms ‘rating of perceived exertion and review’ and ‘perceived exertion and review’. Eighteen papers whose main objective was to determine the overall perceived exertion during physical exercise were included in the present study. It was observed that, despite the existence of the early corollary discharge theory, after Borg’s propositions most of the literature has explained perceived exertion using the afferent feedback theory based on correlational studies. It was only in 2009 that there was a resurgence of the original corollary discharge theory in perceived exertion papers. Most of the perceived exertion concepts are related to the afferent feedback mechanism, using constructs such as physiological responses, stress, discomfort and pain. However, these constructs are incongruent with the corollary discharge theory, presenting physiological mechanisms that differ from those of perceived exertion. Therefore, Borg’s studies have influenced contemporary views of the mechanisms and concepts of perceived exertion. Over the years, additional constructs have been incorporated into the original Borg’s concept, although always on the basis of the afferent feedback theory.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-08-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Avaliado por Pares","Artigo Solicitado"
"Avaliado por Pares", "Artigo Solicitado"
Revisão de Literatura
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n5p579
10.1590/1980-0037.2014v16n5p579
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n5p579
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1980-0037.2014v16n5p579
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2014v16n5p579/27559
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 16 No. 5 (2014); 579-587
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 16 n. 5 (2014); 579-587
1980-0037
1415-8426
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435123573194752