Graded and ramp protocols present similar results in apparently healthy subjects

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Thiago Barbosa
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Santos, Tony Meireles, Damasceno, Vinicius de Oliveira, Campos, Eduado Zapaterra
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/57565
Resumo: The aim of the study was to compare maximum oxygen uptake, maximum heart rate, speed corresponding to VO2max, time to exhaustion, and ventilatory thresholds between two maximal test protocols (scaled vs ramp) with equalized metabolic demand in apparently healthy young adults. Twenty-seven subjects of both sexes were analyzed and submitted to two maximum tests: 1) scaled test with 1.2 km∙h-1 every 2 min; 2) ramp test with 0.1 km∙h-1 every 0.18 min; both with 1% slope and maximum total duration of twenty minutes. Respiratory gas exchanges were directly analyzed, and ventilatory thresholds determined through visual inspection. Central tendency and dispersion measures were adopted, as well as paired t-test and effect size. Bland-Altman analysis verified the agreement among variables. Maximum speed showed significance difference (p < 0.01) for the scaled test (14.0 ± 1.9 km∙h-1) and ramp test (14.6 ± 2.3 km∙h-1). Even with small BIAS values, negative trend and high limits of agreement could be observed. Despite the non-difference presented for variables, except for maximum speed, it could be concluded that the scaled test is able to determine the analyzed variables similar to the ramp test, considering the same conditions of the present study.
id UFSC-16_c74fa576d48a544cda88b56531a12874
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/57565
network_acronym_str UFSC-16
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Graded and ramp protocols present similar results in apparently healthy subjectsProtocolo escalonado e de rampa apresentam resultados similares em indivíduos aparentemente saudáveisThe aim of the study was to compare maximum oxygen uptake, maximum heart rate, speed corresponding to VO2max, time to exhaustion, and ventilatory thresholds between two maximal test protocols (scaled vs ramp) with equalized metabolic demand in apparently healthy young adults. Twenty-seven subjects of both sexes were analyzed and submitted to two maximum tests: 1) scaled test with 1.2 km∙h-1 every 2 min; 2) ramp test with 0.1 km∙h-1 every 0.18 min; both with 1% slope and maximum total duration of twenty minutes. Respiratory gas exchanges were directly analyzed, and ventilatory thresholds determined through visual inspection. Central tendency and dispersion measures were adopted, as well as paired t-test and effect size. Bland-Altman analysis verified the agreement among variables. Maximum speed showed significance difference (p < 0.01) for the scaled test (14.0 ± 1.9 km∙h-1) and ramp test (14.6 ± 2.3 km∙h-1). Even with small BIAS values, negative trend and high limits of agreement could be observed. Despite the non-difference presented for variables, except for maximum speed, it could be concluded that the scaled test is able to determine the analyzed variables similar to the ramp test, considering the same conditions of the present study.O objetivo do estudo foi comparar o consumo máximo de oxigênio (VO2máx), frequência cardíaca (FC) máxima velocidade associada ao VO2máx, tempo até a exaustão e limiares ventilatórios entre dois protocolos de teste máximo (escalonado vs. rampa) com demanda metabólica equalizada em jovens adultos aparentemente saudáveis. Vinte e sete sujeitos de ambos os sexos foram analisados e submetidos à dois testes máximos: 1) escalonado com 1,2 km·h-1 a cada 2 min; 2) rampa com 0,1 km·h-1 a cada 0,18 min; ambos com 1% de inclinação e duração total máxima prevista de vinte minutos. As trocas respiratórias foram analisadas diretamente, e os limiares ventilatórios determinados por inspeção visual. Medidas de tendência central e dispersão foram adotadas, assim como um teste t pareado e tamanho do efeito. A análise de Bland-Altman verificou a concordância entre as variáveis. A única variável a apresentar diferença estatística (p < 0,01) foi a velocidade máxima (escalonado = 14,0 ± 1,9 km·h-1) e (rampa = 14,6 ± 2,3 km∙h-1). Mesmo com baixos valores de BIAS, é possível verificar uma tendência negativa assim como altos limites de concordância. Apesar da não diferença apresentada para as variáveis, exceto para a velocidade máxima, é possível afirmar que o teste escalonado é capaz de determinar as variáveis analisadas de modo semelhante ao teste rampa considerando as mesmas condições do presente estudo.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2020-11-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares",Avaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/57565Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 22 (2020); e57565 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 22 (2020); e57565 1980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/57565/44618Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humanoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Thiago BarbosaSantos, Tony MeirelesDamasceno, Vinicius de OliveiraCampos, Eduado Zapaterra2020-09-10T10:10:04Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/57565Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2020-09-10T10:10:04Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Graded and ramp protocols present similar results in apparently healthy subjects
Protocolo escalonado e de rampa apresentam resultados similares em indivíduos aparentemente saudáveis
title Graded and ramp protocols present similar results in apparently healthy subjects
spellingShingle Graded and ramp protocols present similar results in apparently healthy subjects
Lima, Thiago Barbosa
title_short Graded and ramp protocols present similar results in apparently healthy subjects
title_full Graded and ramp protocols present similar results in apparently healthy subjects
title_fullStr Graded and ramp protocols present similar results in apparently healthy subjects
title_full_unstemmed Graded and ramp protocols present similar results in apparently healthy subjects
title_sort Graded and ramp protocols present similar results in apparently healthy subjects
author Lima, Thiago Barbosa
author_facet Lima, Thiago Barbosa
Santos, Tony Meireles
Damasceno, Vinicius de Oliveira
Campos, Eduado Zapaterra
author_role author
author2 Santos, Tony Meireles
Damasceno, Vinicius de Oliveira
Campos, Eduado Zapaterra
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Thiago Barbosa
Santos, Tony Meireles
Damasceno, Vinicius de Oliveira
Campos, Eduado Zapaterra
description The aim of the study was to compare maximum oxygen uptake, maximum heart rate, speed corresponding to VO2max, time to exhaustion, and ventilatory thresholds between two maximal test protocols (scaled vs ramp) with equalized metabolic demand in apparently healthy young adults. Twenty-seven subjects of both sexes were analyzed and submitted to two maximum tests: 1) scaled test with 1.2 km∙h-1 every 2 min; 2) ramp test with 0.1 km∙h-1 every 0.18 min; both with 1% slope and maximum total duration of twenty minutes. Respiratory gas exchanges were directly analyzed, and ventilatory thresholds determined through visual inspection. Central tendency and dispersion measures were adopted, as well as paired t-test and effect size. Bland-Altman analysis verified the agreement among variables. Maximum speed showed significance difference (p < 0.01) for the scaled test (14.0 ± 1.9 km∙h-1) and ramp test (14.6 ± 2.3 km∙h-1). Even with small BIAS values, negative trend and high limits of agreement could be observed. Despite the non-difference presented for variables, except for maximum speed, it could be concluded that the scaled test is able to determine the analyzed variables similar to the ramp test, considering the same conditions of the present study.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Avaliado por Pares",
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/57565
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/57565
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/57565/44618
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 22 (2020); e57565
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 22 (2020); e57565
1980-0037
1415-8426
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435125566537728