Clothing interference in performance, articular range of motion and comfort in labor gymnastics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2010v12n6p443 |
Resumo: | The objective of this descriptive case study was to analyze the interference of clothing with exercise performance, joint range of motion (ROM), and comfort during a session of labor gymnastics wearing a uniform (UNI) and specific exercise clothes (SEC). Twenty female workers (28.9±10.2 years) from a company in Florianópolis were studied. A photo camera, Wells bench, a questionnaire, and interview were used for data collection. The subjects were submitted to seven types of exercise wearing UNI and SEC: hip flexion, shoulder flexion, trunk flexion-hips and ankle angles, shoulder extension, modified trunk flexion-hips and ankle angles, horizontal shoulder adduction, and a sit-and-reach test. The results were analyzed using the paired t-test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test (p≤0.05). Seven women wearing UNI tended not to show the body, 17 removed some part of UNI, and 13 noted movement limitation. Discomfort was lower in the upper body part during hip flexion and horizontal shoulder adduction and in the lower part during shoulder flexion, extension and horizontal shoulder adduction. Lower ROM values were observed for subjects wearing UNI compared to those wearing SEC during hip flexion (p=0.017), shoulder flexion (p=0.0075), trunk flexion (hips and ankle angles), modified trunk flexion (ankle angles), and the sit-and-reach test (linear and angular values) (p<0.001). Trunk flexion performance (ankle angles) was better in the UNI condition (p=0.001), probably because the subjects were wearing shoes. In conclusion, clothing tends to interfere with ROM and comfort, but not with exercise performance. |
id |
UFSC-16_e3f6dfb99204be87dde08443e3b57028 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/12368 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-16 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Clothing interference in performance, articular range of motion and comfort in labor gymnasticsInterferência do vestuário no desempenho, na amplitude de movimento e no conforto na ginástica laboralThe objective of this descriptive case study was to analyze the interference of clothing with exercise performance, joint range of motion (ROM), and comfort during a session of labor gymnastics wearing a uniform (UNI) and specific exercise clothes (SEC). Twenty female workers (28.9±10.2 years) from a company in Florianópolis were studied. A photo camera, Wells bench, a questionnaire, and interview were used for data collection. The subjects were submitted to seven types of exercise wearing UNI and SEC: hip flexion, shoulder flexion, trunk flexion-hips and ankle angles, shoulder extension, modified trunk flexion-hips and ankle angles, horizontal shoulder adduction, and a sit-and-reach test. The results were analyzed using the paired t-test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test (p≤0.05). Seven women wearing UNI tended not to show the body, 17 removed some part of UNI, and 13 noted movement limitation. Discomfort was lower in the upper body part during hip flexion and horizontal shoulder adduction and in the lower part during shoulder flexion, extension and horizontal shoulder adduction. Lower ROM values were observed for subjects wearing UNI compared to those wearing SEC during hip flexion (p=0.017), shoulder flexion (p=0.0075), trunk flexion (hips and ankle angles), modified trunk flexion (ankle angles), and the sit-and-reach test (linear and angular values) (p<0.001). Trunk flexion performance (ankle angles) was better in the UNI condition (p=0.001), probably because the subjects were wearing shoes. In conclusion, clothing tends to interfere with ROM and comfort, but not with exercise performance.Este estudo descritivo de caso objetivou analisar a interferência do vestuário no desempenho, na amplitude de movimento (ADM) e no conforto dos exercícios físicos (EF) realizados na ginástica laboral (GL) com uniforme (UNI) e vestuário para a prática de exercícios físicos (VEF). Participaram 20 trabalhadoras com 28,9±10,2 anos de uma empresa de Florianópolis. Foram utilizados uma câmera fotográfica, banco de Wells, questionário e entrevista. Foram realizados sete EF: flexão do quadril, flexão do ombro, flexão do tronco--ângulos do quadril e tornozelo, extensão do ombro, flexão do tronco modificado-ângulos do quadril e tornozelo, adução horizontal do ombro e teste de sentar e alcançar com UNI e VEF. Aplicaram-se o teste t pareado, Qui-quadrado e Exato de Fisher, p≤0,05. Constatou--se que, com UNI, sete trabalhadoras cuidavam para não mostrar o corpo, 17 retiravam peças do vestuário e 13 perceberam limitação do movimento. A presença de desconforto na parte superior do corpo foi menor nos EF de flexão do quadril e adução horizontal do ombro e na parte inferior nos EF de flexão, extensão e adução horizontal do ombro. Com UNI, as ADM foram menores do que com VEF nos EF: flexão do quadril (p=0,017), flexão do ombro (p=0,0075), flexão do tronco (quadril e tornozelo), flexão do tronco modificado (tornozelo), teste de sentar e alcançar (valores angulares e lineares) (p<0,001). O desem-penho da flexão do tronco (tornozelo) foi melhor (p=0,001) com UNI devido ao calçado. Conclui-se que o vestuário tende a interferir na ADM e no conforto, mas não no desem-penho dos exercícios físicos.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2010-09-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares",Avaliado por ParesDescritiva; Entrevista; Questionário;application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2010v12n6p44310.1590/1980-0037.2010v12n6p443Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 12 No. 6 (2010); 443-450Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 12 n. 6 (2010); 443-4501980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2010v12n6p443/13547https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2010v12n6p443/13548Tirloni, Adriana SeáraMoro, Antônio Renato Pereirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-21T14:14:52Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/12368Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2022-11-21T14:14:52Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Clothing interference in performance, articular range of motion and comfort in labor gymnastics Interferência do vestuário no desempenho, na amplitude de movimento e no conforto na ginástica laboral |
title |
Clothing interference in performance, articular range of motion and comfort in labor gymnastics |
spellingShingle |
Clothing interference in performance, articular range of motion and comfort in labor gymnastics Tirloni, Adriana Seára |
title_short |
Clothing interference in performance, articular range of motion and comfort in labor gymnastics |
title_full |
Clothing interference in performance, articular range of motion and comfort in labor gymnastics |
title_fullStr |
Clothing interference in performance, articular range of motion and comfort in labor gymnastics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clothing interference in performance, articular range of motion and comfort in labor gymnastics |
title_sort |
Clothing interference in performance, articular range of motion and comfort in labor gymnastics |
author |
Tirloni, Adriana Seára |
author_facet |
Tirloni, Adriana Seára Moro, Antônio Renato Pereira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Moro, Antônio Renato Pereira |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tirloni, Adriana Seára Moro, Antônio Renato Pereira |
description |
The objective of this descriptive case study was to analyze the interference of clothing with exercise performance, joint range of motion (ROM), and comfort during a session of labor gymnastics wearing a uniform (UNI) and specific exercise clothes (SEC). Twenty female workers (28.9±10.2 years) from a company in Florianópolis were studied. A photo camera, Wells bench, a questionnaire, and interview were used for data collection. The subjects were submitted to seven types of exercise wearing UNI and SEC: hip flexion, shoulder flexion, trunk flexion-hips and ankle angles, shoulder extension, modified trunk flexion-hips and ankle angles, horizontal shoulder adduction, and a sit-and-reach test. The results were analyzed using the paired t-test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test (p≤0.05). Seven women wearing UNI tended not to show the body, 17 removed some part of UNI, and 13 noted movement limitation. Discomfort was lower in the upper body part during hip flexion and horizontal shoulder adduction and in the lower part during shoulder flexion, extension and horizontal shoulder adduction. Lower ROM values were observed for subjects wearing UNI compared to those wearing SEC during hip flexion (p=0.017), shoulder flexion (p=0.0075), trunk flexion (hips and ankle angles), modified trunk flexion (ankle angles), and the sit-and-reach test (linear and angular values) (p<0.001). Trunk flexion performance (ankle angles) was better in the UNI condition (p=0.001), probably because the subjects were wearing shoes. In conclusion, clothing tends to interfere with ROM and comfort, but not with exercise performance. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-09-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Avaliado por Pares", Avaliado por Pares Descritiva; Entrevista; Questionário; |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2010v12n6p443 10.1590/1980-0037.2010v12n6p443 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2010v12n6p443 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-0037.2010v12n6p443 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2010v12n6p443/13547 https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2010v12n6p443/13548 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 12 No. 6 (2010); 443-450 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 12 n. 6 (2010); 443-450 1980-0037 1415-8426 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435121878695936 |