Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Política & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2020v19n44p204 |
Resumo: | Authors such as Pocock, Skinner and Pettit have revalued republicanism as a fundamental political tradition in the constitution of the modern world in contrast to the hegemony of the liberal tradition. This paper aims to analyze what has been characterized as a most problematic and challenging relationship for Republicans: the relationship between republicanism and Christianity. Taking as its thread the analysis of the debate between Black and Nederman, we argue that the difficulty in analyzing the relationship between republicanism and Christianity derives from the very difficulties of the neo-republican project in delimiting republicanism as a specific political tradition. Overcoming such dilemmas would involve a better qualification of the republican tradition including the themes of the political community as a "universal community", a non-instrumental conception of public life, and the recognition that the conception of liberty as non-domination implies that republican institutions promote certain values. |
id |
UFSC-18_0d71d5eb8d4066130c0b126f6375b349 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/55190 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-18 |
network_name_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationshipRepublicanismo e cristianismo: dilemas de uma relação problemáticaAuthors such as Pocock, Skinner and Pettit have revalued republicanism as a fundamental political tradition in the constitution of the modern world in contrast to the hegemony of the liberal tradition. This paper aims to analyze what has been characterized as a most problematic and challenging relationship for Republicans: the relationship between republicanism and Christianity. Taking as its thread the analysis of the debate between Black and Nederman, we argue that the difficulty in analyzing the relationship between republicanism and Christianity derives from the very difficulties of the neo-republican project in delimiting republicanism as a specific political tradition. Overcoming such dilemmas would involve a better qualification of the republican tradition including the themes of the political community as a "universal community", a non-instrumental conception of public life, and the recognition that the conception of liberty as non-domination implies that republican institutions promote certain values.Autores como Pocock, Skinner e Pettit têm revalorizado o republicanismo como tradição política fundamental na constituição do mundo moderno em contraste com a hegemonia da tradição liberal. Este trabalho pretende analisar aquela que tem sido caracterizada como uma relação das mais problemáticas e desafiadoras para os republicanos: a relação entre republicanismo e cristianismo. Argumentamos que a dificuldade na análise das relações entre republicanismo e cristianismo deriva das próprias dificuldades do projeto neorrepublicano em delimitar o republicanismo como tradição política específica. A superação de tais dilemas envolveria uma melhor qualificação da tradição republicana incluindo os temas da comunidade política como "comunidade universal", uma concepção não instrumental da vida pública e o reconhecimento de que a concepção da liberdade como não dominação implica que as instituições republicanas promovem determinados valores.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2020-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2020v19n44p20410.5007/2175-7984.2020v19n44p204Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 No. 44 (2020); 204-228Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 Núm. 44 (2020); 204-228Política & Sociedade; v. 19 n. 44 (2020); 204-2282175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2020v19n44p204/43483Copyright (c) 2020 Política & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTrindade, GleytonCerveira, Sandro2020-06-04T15:27:57Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/55190Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2020-06-04T15:27:57Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship Republicanismo e cristianismo: dilemas de uma relação problemática |
title |
Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship |
spellingShingle |
Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship Trindade, Gleyton |
title_short |
Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship |
title_full |
Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship |
title_fullStr |
Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship |
title_full_unstemmed |
Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship |
title_sort |
Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship |
author |
Trindade, Gleyton |
author_facet |
Trindade, Gleyton Cerveira, Sandro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cerveira, Sandro |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Trindade, Gleyton Cerveira, Sandro |
description |
Authors such as Pocock, Skinner and Pettit have revalued republicanism as a fundamental political tradition in the constitution of the modern world in contrast to the hegemony of the liberal tradition. This paper aims to analyze what has been characterized as a most problematic and challenging relationship for Republicans: the relationship between republicanism and Christianity. Taking as its thread the analysis of the debate between Black and Nederman, we argue that the difficulty in analyzing the relationship between republicanism and Christianity derives from the very difficulties of the neo-republican project in delimiting republicanism as a specific political tradition. Overcoming such dilemmas would involve a better qualification of the republican tradition including the themes of the political community as a "universal community", a non-instrumental conception of public life, and the recognition that the conception of liberty as non-domination implies that republican institutions promote certain values. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2020v19n44p204 10.5007/2175-7984.2020v19n44p204 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2020v19n44p204 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-7984.2020v19n44p204 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2020v19n44p204/43483 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Política & Sociedade info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Política & Sociedade |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 No. 44 (2020); 204-228 Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 Núm. 44 (2020); 204-228 Política & Sociedade; v. 19 n. 44 (2020); 204-228 2175-7984 1677-4140 reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435205760581632 |