Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Trindade, Gleyton
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Cerveira, Sandro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Política & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2020v19n44p204
Resumo: Authors such as Pocock, Skinner and Pettit have revalued republicanism as a fundamental political tradition in the constitution of the modern world in contrast to the hegemony of the liberal tradition. This paper aims to analyze what has been characterized as a most problematic and challenging relationship for Republicans: the relationship between republicanism and Christianity. Taking as its thread the analysis of the debate between Black and Nederman, we argue that the difficulty in analyzing the relationship between republicanism and Christianity derives from the very difficulties of the neo-republican project in delimiting republicanism as a specific political tradition. Overcoming such dilemmas would involve a better qualification of the republican tradition including the themes of the political community as a "universal community", a non-instrumental conception of public life, and the recognition that the conception of liberty as non-domination implies that republican institutions promote certain values.
id UFSC-18_0d71d5eb8d4066130c0b126f6375b349
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/55190
network_acronym_str UFSC-18
network_name_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationshipRepublicanismo e cristianismo: dilemas de uma relação problemáticaAuthors such as Pocock, Skinner and Pettit have revalued republicanism as a fundamental political tradition in the constitution of the modern world in contrast to the hegemony of the liberal tradition. This paper aims to analyze what has been characterized as a most problematic and challenging relationship for Republicans: the relationship between republicanism and Christianity. Taking as its thread the analysis of the debate between Black and Nederman, we argue that the difficulty in analyzing the relationship between republicanism and Christianity derives from the very difficulties of the neo-republican project in delimiting republicanism as a specific political tradition. Overcoming such dilemmas would involve a better qualification of the republican tradition including the themes of the political community as a "universal community", a non-instrumental conception of public life, and the recognition that the conception of liberty as non-domination implies that republican institutions promote certain values.Autores como Pocock, Skinner e Pettit têm revalorizado o republicanismo como tradição política fundamental na constituição do mundo moderno em contraste com a hegemonia da tradição liberal. Este trabalho pretende analisar aquela que tem sido caracterizada como uma relação das mais problemáticas e desafiadoras para os republicanos: a relação entre republicanismo e cristianismo. Argumentamos que a dificuldade na análise das relações entre republicanismo e cristianismo deriva das próprias dificuldades do projeto neorrepublicano em delimitar o republicanismo como tradição política específica. A superação de tais dilemas envolveria uma melhor qualificação da tradição republicana incluindo os temas da comunidade política como "comunidade universal", uma concepção não instrumental da vida pública e o reconhecimento de que a concepção da liberdade como não dominação implica que as instituições republicanas promovem determinados valores.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2020-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2020v19n44p20410.5007/2175-7984.2020v19n44p204Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 No. 44 (2020); 204-228Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 Núm. 44 (2020); 204-228Política & Sociedade; v. 19 n. 44 (2020); 204-2282175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2020v19n44p204/43483Copyright (c) 2020 Política & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTrindade, GleytonCerveira, Sandro2020-06-04T15:27:57Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/55190Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2020-06-04T15:27:57Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship
Republicanismo e cristianismo: dilemas de uma relação problemática
title Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship
spellingShingle Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship
Trindade, Gleyton
title_short Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship
title_full Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship
title_fullStr Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship
title_full_unstemmed Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship
title_sort Republicanism and christianity: dilemms of a problematic relationship
author Trindade, Gleyton
author_facet Trindade, Gleyton
Cerveira, Sandro
author_role author
author2 Cerveira, Sandro
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Trindade, Gleyton
Cerveira, Sandro
description Authors such as Pocock, Skinner and Pettit have revalued republicanism as a fundamental political tradition in the constitution of the modern world in contrast to the hegemony of the liberal tradition. This paper aims to analyze what has been characterized as a most problematic and challenging relationship for Republicans: the relationship between republicanism and Christianity. Taking as its thread the analysis of the debate between Black and Nederman, we argue that the difficulty in analyzing the relationship between republicanism and Christianity derives from the very difficulties of the neo-republican project in delimiting republicanism as a specific political tradition. Overcoming such dilemmas would involve a better qualification of the republican tradition including the themes of the political community as a "universal community", a non-instrumental conception of public life, and the recognition that the conception of liberty as non-domination implies that republican institutions promote certain values.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2020v19n44p204
10.5007/2175-7984.2020v19n44p204
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2020v19n44p204
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-7984.2020v19n44p204
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2020v19n44p204/43483
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Política & Sociedade
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Política & Sociedade
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 No. 44 (2020); 204-228
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 Núm. 44 (2020); 204-228
Política & Sociedade; v. 19 n. 44 (2020); 204-228
2175-7984
1677-4140
reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
collection Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435205760581632