Max Weber has two sociologies? Comparative analysis of the conceptual scheme of On some categories of comprehensive sociology (1913) and Fundamental sociological concepts (1921)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bolda, Bruna dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Política & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/73441
Resumo: The critical republication of Max Weber’s work, Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe, sparked a debateabout changes and permanence of the Weberian lexicon. An example is a controversy betweenthe essays Kategorien (1913) and Grundbegriffe (1921). Schluchter (2014) argues there wasonly a lexicon refinement without any conception change. Lichtblau (2015) contends there wasan approach change: historical, in 1913; sociological, in 1921. Thus, the objective is to identifyand discuss the analytical implications of the theoretical-conceptual changes made by Weber inKategorien and Grundbegriffe to understand his conception development of Sociology. Therefore,the existence of a micro-macro model of upward causality is recognized in both Kategorienand Grundbegriffe. But, it is necessary to recognize the texts have gone through a process oftheoretical maturation and conceptual improvement to modify the conceptual content of somefundamental categories of the Weberian scheme.
id UFSC-18_3613c049009d2d52d19688969f8251d2
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/73441
network_acronym_str UFSC-18
network_name_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Max Weber has two sociologies? Comparative analysis of the conceptual scheme of On some categories of comprehensive sociology (1913) and Fundamental sociological concepts (1921)Max Weber possui duas sociologias? Análise comparativa do esquema conceitual de Sobre algumas categorias da sociologia compreensiva (1913) e Conceitos sociológicos-fundamentais (1921)The critical republication of Max Weber’s work, Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe, sparked a debateabout changes and permanence of the Weberian lexicon. An example is a controversy betweenthe essays Kategorien (1913) and Grundbegriffe (1921). Schluchter (2014) argues there wasonly a lexicon refinement without any conception change. Lichtblau (2015) contends there wasan approach change: historical, in 1913; sociological, in 1921. Thus, the objective is to identifyand discuss the analytical implications of the theoretical-conceptual changes made by Weber inKategorien and Grundbegriffe to understand his conception development of Sociology. Therefore,the existence of a micro-macro model of upward causality is recognized in both Kategorienand Grundbegriffe. But, it is necessary to recognize the texts have gone through a process oftheoretical maturation and conceptual improvement to modify the conceptual content of somefundamental categories of the Weberian scheme.A republicação crítica da obra de Max Weber, a Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe, suscitou o debate sobre as mudanças e as permanências do léxico weberiano. Um exemplo é a controvérsia entre os ensaios Kategorien (1913) e Grundbegriffe (1921). Schluchter (2014) defende que houve somente um refinamento do léxico, sem mudança de concepção. Lichtblau (2015) argumenta que houve mudança de abordagem: em 1913, histórica e em 1921, sociológica. À vista desse embate, objetiva-se identificar e discutir as implicações analíticas das alterações conceituais realizadas por Weber em Kategorien e em Grundbegriffe a fim de compreender o desenvolvimento de sua concepção de Sociologia. Reconhece-se a existência de um modelo micro-macro de causalidade ascendente tanto em Kategorien quanto em Grundbegriffe. Mas é necessário esclarecer que os textos passaram por um processo de amadurecimento teórico e de aperfeiçoamento conceitual tendo em vista a modificação do conteúdo conceitual de algumas categorias fundamentais do esquema weberiano. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2020-08-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/7344110.5007/175-7984.2020v19n45p83Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 No. 45 (2020); 83-117Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 Núm. 45 (2020); 83-117Política & Sociedade; v. 19 n. 45 (2020); 83-1172175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/73441/44714Copyright (c) 2020 Política & Sociedadehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBolda, Bruna dos Santos2020-11-19T18:33:42Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/73441Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2020-11-19T18:33:42Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Max Weber has two sociologies? Comparative analysis of the conceptual scheme of On some categories of comprehensive sociology (1913) and Fundamental sociological concepts (1921)
Max Weber possui duas sociologias? Análise comparativa do esquema conceitual de Sobre algumas categorias da sociologia compreensiva (1913) e Conceitos sociológicos-fundamentais (1921)
title Max Weber has two sociologies? Comparative analysis of the conceptual scheme of On some categories of comprehensive sociology (1913) and Fundamental sociological concepts (1921)
spellingShingle Max Weber has two sociologies? Comparative analysis of the conceptual scheme of On some categories of comprehensive sociology (1913) and Fundamental sociological concepts (1921)
Bolda, Bruna dos Santos
title_short Max Weber has two sociologies? Comparative analysis of the conceptual scheme of On some categories of comprehensive sociology (1913) and Fundamental sociological concepts (1921)
title_full Max Weber has two sociologies? Comparative analysis of the conceptual scheme of On some categories of comprehensive sociology (1913) and Fundamental sociological concepts (1921)
title_fullStr Max Weber has two sociologies? Comparative analysis of the conceptual scheme of On some categories of comprehensive sociology (1913) and Fundamental sociological concepts (1921)
title_full_unstemmed Max Weber has two sociologies? Comparative analysis of the conceptual scheme of On some categories of comprehensive sociology (1913) and Fundamental sociological concepts (1921)
title_sort Max Weber has two sociologies? Comparative analysis of the conceptual scheme of On some categories of comprehensive sociology (1913) and Fundamental sociological concepts (1921)
author Bolda, Bruna dos Santos
author_facet Bolda, Bruna dos Santos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bolda, Bruna dos Santos
description The critical republication of Max Weber’s work, Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe, sparked a debateabout changes and permanence of the Weberian lexicon. An example is a controversy betweenthe essays Kategorien (1913) and Grundbegriffe (1921). Schluchter (2014) argues there wasonly a lexicon refinement without any conception change. Lichtblau (2015) contends there wasan approach change: historical, in 1913; sociological, in 1921. Thus, the objective is to identifyand discuss the analytical implications of the theoretical-conceptual changes made by Weber inKategorien and Grundbegriffe to understand his conception development of Sociology. Therefore,the existence of a micro-macro model of upward causality is recognized in both Kategorienand Grundbegriffe. But, it is necessary to recognize the texts have gone through a process oftheoretical maturation and conceptual improvement to modify the conceptual content of somefundamental categories of the Weberian scheme.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/73441
10.5007/175-7984.2020v19n45p83
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/73441
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/175-7984.2020v19n45p83
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/73441/44714
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Política & Sociedade
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Política & Sociedade
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 No. 45 (2020); 83-117
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 Núm. 45 (2020); 83-117
Política & Sociedade; v. 19 n. 45 (2020); 83-117
2175-7984
1677-4140
reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
collection Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435206232440832

Registros relacionados