From secret sessions to the “indecent transparency” of the open doors: an introduction to Brazilian Constitutional History

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nascimento dos Santos, Carlos Victor
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Política & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/90254
Resumo: This paper aims to produce an archeology of the category “open doors” and, consequently, to present elements capable of facilitating the comprehension about the exercise of collegiality in the Brazilian Courts. To do this, a historical research was produced from the consultation of the annals of the Brazilian Parliament from 1826 to 1828, laws and ordinances before and after the indicated period, in addition to bibliographic analysis about this. As a result, in addition to the demonstration of tensions between the State Powers, two important moments are presented to understand the format of the trial sessions in the Courts: the beginning (i) of a “Brazilian constitutionalism” and (ii) of the autonomy of the Brazilian Courts. The demarcation of these moments allowed us to understand how, in a little less than two hundred years of Brazilian Constitutional History, the Courts migrated from a format in which (i) they discussed and deliberated with the closed doors, moving to a mixed system in which they discussed in Secret Sessions and deliberated with the open doors for (iii) a system in which they discuss and deliberate with the open doors (i) they discussed and deliberated with the closed doors, moving to a mixed system in which they discussed in Secret Sessions and deliberated with the open doors for (iii) a system in which they discuss and deliberate with the open doors.
id UFSC-18_55f24bcfe82697d5923fd5b442384155
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/90254
network_acronym_str UFSC-18
network_name_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling From secret sessions to the “indecent transparency” of the open doors: an introduction to Brazilian Constitutional HistoryDas sessões secretas à “transparência indecente” das portas abertas: uma introdução à história constitucional brasileiraSupremo Tribunal FederalPortas abertasSessão de julgamentoHistória constitucionalParlamento brasileiroBrazilian Supreme CourtOpen doorsTrial sessionsConstitutional HistoryBrazilian ParliamentThis paper aims to produce an archeology of the category “open doors” and, consequently, to present elements capable of facilitating the comprehension about the exercise of collegiality in the Brazilian Courts. To do this, a historical research was produced from the consultation of the annals of the Brazilian Parliament from 1826 to 1828, laws and ordinances before and after the indicated period, in addition to bibliographic analysis about this. As a result, in addition to the demonstration of tensions between the State Powers, two important moments are presented to understand the format of the trial sessions in the Courts: the beginning (i) of a “Brazilian constitutionalism” and (ii) of the autonomy of the Brazilian Courts. The demarcation of these moments allowed us to understand how, in a little less than two hundred years of Brazilian Constitutional History, the Courts migrated from a format in which (i) they discussed and deliberated with the closed doors, moving to a mixed system in which they discussed in Secret Sessions and deliberated with the open doors for (iii) a system in which they discuss and deliberate with the open doors (i) they discussed and deliberated with the closed doors, moving to a mixed system in which they discussed in Secret Sessions and deliberated with the open doors for (iii) a system in which they discuss and deliberate with the open doors.O artigo produz uma arqueologia da categoria “portas abertas” e, consequentemente, apresenta elementos capazes de facilitar a compreensão sobre o exercício da colegialidade nos tribunais brasileiros. Para tanto, foi produzida uma pesquisa historiográfica a partir da consulta aos anais do parlamento brasileiro de 1826 a 1828, leis e ordenanças anteriores e posteriores ao período indicado, além de análise bibliográfica sobre o tema. Como resultados, além da demonstração de tensões entre os Poderes de Estado, são apresentados dois importantes momentos para compreender o formato das sessões de julgamento nos tribunais: (i) o início de um “constitucionalismo brasileiro” e (ii) o processo de autonomização administrativa dos tribunais brasileiros. A demarcação destes momentos permitiu compreender como, em pouco menos de duzentos anos de história constitucional brasileira, os tribunais migraram de um formato em que (i) discutiam e deliberavam a portas fechadas, passando para um sistema misto em que discutiam em sessões secretas e deliberavam a portas abertas para (iii) um sistema em que discutem e deliberam a portas abertas.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2023-08-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/9025410.5007/2175-7984.2022.e90254Política & Sociedade; Vol. 21 No. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 226-254Política & Sociedade; Vol. 21 Núm. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 226-254Política & Sociedade; v. 21 n. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 226-2542175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/90254/54079http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNascimento dos Santos, Carlos Victor2023-08-23T17:26:58Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/90254Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2023-08-23T17:26:58Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv From secret sessions to the “indecent transparency” of the open doors: an introduction to Brazilian Constitutional History
Das sessões secretas à “transparência indecente” das portas abertas: uma introdução à história constitucional brasileira
title From secret sessions to the “indecent transparency” of the open doors: an introduction to Brazilian Constitutional History
spellingShingle From secret sessions to the “indecent transparency” of the open doors: an introduction to Brazilian Constitutional History
Nascimento dos Santos, Carlos Victor
Supremo Tribunal Federal
Portas abertas
Sessão de julgamento
História constitucional
Parlamento brasileiro
Brazilian Supreme Court
Open doors
Trial sessions
Constitutional History
Brazilian Parliament
title_short From secret sessions to the “indecent transparency” of the open doors: an introduction to Brazilian Constitutional History
title_full From secret sessions to the “indecent transparency” of the open doors: an introduction to Brazilian Constitutional History
title_fullStr From secret sessions to the “indecent transparency” of the open doors: an introduction to Brazilian Constitutional History
title_full_unstemmed From secret sessions to the “indecent transparency” of the open doors: an introduction to Brazilian Constitutional History
title_sort From secret sessions to the “indecent transparency” of the open doors: an introduction to Brazilian Constitutional History
author Nascimento dos Santos, Carlos Victor
author_facet Nascimento dos Santos, Carlos Victor
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nascimento dos Santos, Carlos Victor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Supremo Tribunal Federal
Portas abertas
Sessão de julgamento
História constitucional
Parlamento brasileiro
Brazilian Supreme Court
Open doors
Trial sessions
Constitutional History
Brazilian Parliament
topic Supremo Tribunal Federal
Portas abertas
Sessão de julgamento
História constitucional
Parlamento brasileiro
Brazilian Supreme Court
Open doors
Trial sessions
Constitutional History
Brazilian Parliament
description This paper aims to produce an archeology of the category “open doors” and, consequently, to present elements capable of facilitating the comprehension about the exercise of collegiality in the Brazilian Courts. To do this, a historical research was produced from the consultation of the annals of the Brazilian Parliament from 1826 to 1828, laws and ordinances before and after the indicated period, in addition to bibliographic analysis about this. As a result, in addition to the demonstration of tensions between the State Powers, two important moments are presented to understand the format of the trial sessions in the Courts: the beginning (i) of a “Brazilian constitutionalism” and (ii) of the autonomy of the Brazilian Courts. The demarcation of these moments allowed us to understand how, in a little less than two hundred years of Brazilian Constitutional History, the Courts migrated from a format in which (i) they discussed and deliberated with the closed doors, moving to a mixed system in which they discussed in Secret Sessions and deliberated with the open doors for (iii) a system in which they discuss and deliberate with the open doors (i) they discussed and deliberated with the closed doors, moving to a mixed system in which they discussed in Secret Sessions and deliberated with the open doors for (iii) a system in which they discuss and deliberate with the open doors.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/90254
10.5007/2175-7984.2022.e90254
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/90254
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-7984.2022.e90254
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/90254/54079
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade; Vol. 21 No. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 226-254
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 21 Núm. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 226-254
Política & Sociedade; v. 21 n. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 226-254
2175-7984
1677-4140
reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
collection Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br
_version_ 1799875159244406784

Registros relacionados