THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/645 |
Resumo: | The article presents an exploratory case study on the response of Latin American constitutional courts to COVID-19 in adverse political scenarios, focusing on the experiences of Brazil and Mexico. Based on the analysis of jurisprudence and interviews with Human Rights activists and researchers from Latin American think tanks, we seek to reflect on the strategic choices that such bodies face about whether or not to position themselves in crisis scenarios, facing trade-offs such as support of public opinion, challenges of decision-making implementation and the maintenance of unity and consistency of position within the Judiciary. It is concluded that, even when persistent implementation challenges are present, such decisions represent an important stimulus and reinforce institutional pressures for political reaction in times of crisis. However, for the courts, the benefits related to the strengthening of social legitimacy and their institutional roles are not as evident. |
id |
RPED-1_3bb87daef9d27dfcdafd2bac0adc8224 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/645 |
network_acronym_str |
RPED-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICOA resposta de Cortes Constitucionais Latino-americanas à COVID-19: estudo comparado das experiências do Brasil e do MéxicoCOVID-19. Constitutional Courts. Brazilian Supreme Court. Mexican Supreme Court of Justice.COVID-19. Cortes Constitucionais. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Suprema Corte de Justiça Mexicana.The article presents an exploratory case study on the response of Latin American constitutional courts to COVID-19 in adverse political scenarios, focusing on the experiences of Brazil and Mexico. Based on the analysis of jurisprudence and interviews with Human Rights activists and researchers from Latin American think tanks, we seek to reflect on the strategic choices that such bodies face about whether or not to position themselves in crisis scenarios, facing trade-offs such as support of public opinion, challenges of decision-making implementation and the maintenance of unity and consistency of position within the Judiciary. It is concluded that, even when persistent implementation challenges are present, such decisions represent an important stimulus and reinforce institutional pressures for political reaction in times of crisis. However, for the courts, the benefits related to the strengthening of social legitimacy and their institutional roles are not as evident.O artigo apresenta um estudo de caso exploratório sobre a resposta de cortes constitucionais latinoamericanas à COVID-19 em cenários políticos adversos com foco nas experiências de Brasil e México. A partir da análise da jurisprudência e de entrevistas com ativistas de Direitos Humanos e pesquisadores de think tanks latinoamericanos, busca-se refletir sobre as escolhas estratégicas que tais órgãos enfrentam sobre posicionar-se ou não em cenários de crise, frente a trade-offs como o apoio da opinião pública, desafios de implementação decisória e a manutenção de unidade e coerência de posicionamento dentro do próprio Judiciário. Conclui-se que, mesmo quando presentes desafios persistentes de implementação, tais decisões representam importante estímulo e reforçam pressões institucionais para a reação política em momentos de crise. Todavia, para as cortes, não são tão evidentes os benefícios relacionados ao fortalecimento da legitimidade social e de seus papéis institucionais.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2022-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/64510.19092/reed.v10.645Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-35Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-352319-081710.19092/reed.v9reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/645/414Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDenari Gomes de Mattos, KarinaBalbi, GuilhermeMastroianni Kirsztajn, Laura 2023-04-04T15:11:03Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/645Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2023-04-04T15:11:03Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO A resposta de Cortes Constitucionais Latino-americanas à COVID-19: estudo comparado das experiências do Brasil e do México |
title |
THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO |
spellingShingle |
THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO Denari Gomes de Mattos, Karina COVID-19. Constitutional Courts. Brazilian Supreme Court. Mexican Supreme Court of Justice. COVID-19. Cortes Constitucionais. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Suprema Corte de Justiça Mexicana. |
title_short |
THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO |
title_full |
THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO |
title_fullStr |
THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO |
title_sort |
THE RESPONSE OF LATIN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS TO COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EXPERIENCES OF BRAZIL AND MEXICO |
author |
Denari Gomes de Mattos, Karina |
author_facet |
Denari Gomes de Mattos, Karina Balbi, Guilherme Mastroianni Kirsztajn, Laura |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Balbi, Guilherme Mastroianni Kirsztajn, Laura |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Denari Gomes de Mattos, Karina Balbi, Guilherme Mastroianni Kirsztajn, Laura |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
COVID-19. Constitutional Courts. Brazilian Supreme Court. Mexican Supreme Court of Justice. COVID-19. Cortes Constitucionais. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Suprema Corte de Justiça Mexicana. |
topic |
COVID-19. Constitutional Courts. Brazilian Supreme Court. Mexican Supreme Court of Justice. COVID-19. Cortes Constitucionais. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Suprema Corte de Justiça Mexicana. |
description |
The article presents an exploratory case study on the response of Latin American constitutional courts to COVID-19 in adverse political scenarios, focusing on the experiences of Brazil and Mexico. Based on the analysis of jurisprudence and interviews with Human Rights activists and researchers from Latin American think tanks, we seek to reflect on the strategic choices that such bodies face about whether or not to position themselves in crisis scenarios, facing trade-offs such as support of public opinion, challenges of decision-making implementation and the maintenance of unity and consistency of position within the Judiciary. It is concluded that, even when persistent implementation challenges are present, such decisions represent an important stimulus and reinforce institutional pressures for political reaction in times of crisis. However, for the courts, the benefits related to the strengthening of social legitimacy and their institutional roles are not as evident. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/645 10.19092/reed.v10.645 |
url |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/645 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19092/reed.v10.645 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/645/414 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-35 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-35 2319-0817 10.19092/reed.v9 reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) instacron:RPED |
instname_str |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
instacron_str |
RPED |
institution |
RPED |
reponame_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
collection |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138702502395904 |