Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Da Ros, Luciano
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Bogéa, Daniel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Política & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/93865
Resumo: The article has two interrelated objectives. The first is to review, classify and adapt to the Brazilian context the concept of court curbing, widely used in comparative literature to examine initiatives by members of the executive and legislative branches who seek to limit the effects of a court's actions, of its members, or of its decisions. To this end, a typology of these initiatives is formulated according to the type of target (decision, magistrate, court) and the intensity of the measure (low, medium, high) that apprehends the variety of phenomena captured by the concept. The second objective is to carry out an application of the concept and typology to the specific examination of a measure of court curbing in Brazil: requests for impeachment of Supreme Court justices. Based on descriptive statistics, we demonstrate that the increase in the number of these requests, observed from 2015 onwards, can only be effectively understood as court curbing from 2019 onwards, when congressmen and, subsequently, the President of the Republic himself began to adopt these initiatives in their interaction with the court. At the same time, we demonstrate that the growth of these initiatives is especially associated with the rise of right-wing parties in the ideological spectrum and that they arise especially in the context of inquiries reported by justice Alexandre de Moraes. Finally, we demonstrate how the gradual increase in the number of requests gave greater discretion to the President of the Federal Senate in his decision-making regarding the processing of these cases.
id UFSC-18_5d8316a288203374e3c3a740b23a68da
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/93865
network_acronym_str UFSC-18
network_name_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justicesContenção Judicial: mapa Conceitual e Pedidos de Impeachment de Ministros do Supremo Tribunal Federalcontenção judicialcourt curbingSupremo Tribunal FederalimpeachmentCourt curbingImpeachmentJusticesSupreme CourtBrazilThe article has two interrelated objectives. The first is to review, classify and adapt to the Brazilian context the concept of court curbing, widely used in comparative literature to examine initiatives by members of the executive and legislative branches who seek to limit the effects of a court's actions, of its members, or of its decisions. To this end, a typology of these initiatives is formulated according to the type of target (decision, magistrate, court) and the intensity of the measure (low, medium, high) that apprehends the variety of phenomena captured by the concept. The second objective is to carry out an application of the concept and typology to the specific examination of a measure of court curbing in Brazil: requests for impeachment of Supreme Court justices. Based on descriptive statistics, we demonstrate that the increase in the number of these requests, observed from 2015 onwards, can only be effectively understood as court curbing from 2019 onwards, when congressmen and, subsequently, the President of the Republic himself began to adopt these initiatives in their interaction with the court. At the same time, we demonstrate that the growth of these initiatives is especially associated with the rise of right-wing parties in the ideological spectrum and that they arise especially in the context of inquiries reported by justice Alexandre de Moraes. Finally, we demonstrate how the gradual increase in the number of requests gave greater discretion to the President of the Federal Senate in his decision-making regarding the processing of these cases.O artigo possui dois objetivos interrelacionados. O primeiro é revisar, classificar e adaptar ao contexto brasileiro o conceito de contenção judicial (court curbing), amplamente empregado na literatura comparada para examinar iniciativas de integrantes dos Poderes Executivo e Legislativo que busquem limitar os efeitos da atuação de um tribunal, dos seus integrantes ou de suas decisões. Para tanto, formula-se uma tipologia dessas iniciativas em função do tipo de alvo (decisão, magistrado, tribunal) e intensidade da medida (baixa, média, alta) que permite apreender a variedade de fenômenos capturados pelo conceito. O segundo objetivo é realizar uma aplicação do conceito e da tipologia ao exame especifico de uma medida de contenção judicial: pedidos de impeachment de Ministros do Supremo Tribunal Federal. A partir de estatística descritiva, demonstramos que o incremento do número desses pedidos, observado a partir de 2015, somente pode ser efetivamente entendido como contenção judicial a partir de 2019, quando parlamentares e, posteriormente, o próprio Presidente da República passaram a adotar essas iniciativas em sua interação com o tribunal. Paralelamente, demonstramos que o crescimento dessas iniciativas está associado especialmente à ascensão de partidos de direita no espectro ideológico e se insurgem especialmente no âmbito de inquéritos relatados pelo Ministro Alexandre de Moraes. Por fim, demonstramos como o crescimento do número de pedidos gradativamente conferiu maior discricionaridade ao Presidente do Senado Federal em sua tomada de decisão quanto ao processamento desses casos.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2023-08-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/9386510.5007/2175-7984.2022.e93865Política & Sociedade; Vol. 21 No. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 184-225Política & Sociedade; Vol. 21 Núm. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 184-225Política & Sociedade; v. 21 n. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 184-2252175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/93865/54078http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDa Ros, LucianoBogéa, Daniel2023-08-23T17:26:57Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/93865Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2023-08-23T17:26:57Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices
Contenção Judicial: mapa Conceitual e Pedidos de Impeachment de Ministros do Supremo Tribunal Federal
title Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices
spellingShingle Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices
Da Ros, Luciano
contenção judicial
court curbing
Supremo Tribunal Federal
impeachment
Court curbing
Impeachment
Justices
Supreme Court
Brazil
title_short Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices
title_full Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices
title_fullStr Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices
title_full_unstemmed Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices
title_sort Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices
author Da Ros, Luciano
author_facet Da Ros, Luciano
Bogéa, Daniel
author_role author
author2 Bogéa, Daniel
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Da Ros, Luciano
Bogéa, Daniel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv contenção judicial
court curbing
Supremo Tribunal Federal
impeachment
Court curbing
Impeachment
Justices
Supreme Court
Brazil
topic contenção judicial
court curbing
Supremo Tribunal Federal
impeachment
Court curbing
Impeachment
Justices
Supreme Court
Brazil
description The article has two interrelated objectives. The first is to review, classify and adapt to the Brazilian context the concept of court curbing, widely used in comparative literature to examine initiatives by members of the executive and legislative branches who seek to limit the effects of a court's actions, of its members, or of its decisions. To this end, a typology of these initiatives is formulated according to the type of target (decision, magistrate, court) and the intensity of the measure (low, medium, high) that apprehends the variety of phenomena captured by the concept. The second objective is to carry out an application of the concept and typology to the specific examination of a measure of court curbing in Brazil: requests for impeachment of Supreme Court justices. Based on descriptive statistics, we demonstrate that the increase in the number of these requests, observed from 2015 onwards, can only be effectively understood as court curbing from 2019 onwards, when congressmen and, subsequently, the President of the Republic himself began to adopt these initiatives in their interaction with the court. At the same time, we demonstrate that the growth of these initiatives is especially associated with the rise of right-wing parties in the ideological spectrum and that they arise especially in the context of inquiries reported by justice Alexandre de Moraes. Finally, we demonstrate how the gradual increase in the number of requests gave greater discretion to the President of the Federal Senate in his decision-making regarding the processing of these cases.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/93865
10.5007/2175-7984.2022.e93865
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/93865
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-7984.2022.e93865
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/93865/54078
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade; Vol. 21 No. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 184-225
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 21 Núm. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 184-225
Política & Sociedade; v. 21 n. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 184-225
2175-7984
1677-4140
reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
collection Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br
_version_ 1799875159264329728