Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Política & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/93865 |
Resumo: | The article has two interrelated objectives. The first is to review, classify and adapt to the Brazilian context the concept of court curbing, widely used in comparative literature to examine initiatives by members of the executive and legislative branches who seek to limit the effects of a court's actions, of its members, or of its decisions. To this end, a typology of these initiatives is formulated according to the type of target (decision, magistrate, court) and the intensity of the measure (low, medium, high) that apprehends the variety of phenomena captured by the concept. The second objective is to carry out an application of the concept and typology to the specific examination of a measure of court curbing in Brazil: requests for impeachment of Supreme Court justices. Based on descriptive statistics, we demonstrate that the increase in the number of these requests, observed from 2015 onwards, can only be effectively understood as court curbing from 2019 onwards, when congressmen and, subsequently, the President of the Republic himself began to adopt these initiatives in their interaction with the court. At the same time, we demonstrate that the growth of these initiatives is especially associated with the rise of right-wing parties in the ideological spectrum and that they arise especially in the context of inquiries reported by justice Alexandre de Moraes. Finally, we demonstrate how the gradual increase in the number of requests gave greater discretion to the President of the Federal Senate in his decision-making regarding the processing of these cases. |
id |
UFSC-18_5d8316a288203374e3c3a740b23a68da |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/93865 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-18 |
network_name_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justicesContenção Judicial: mapa Conceitual e Pedidos de Impeachment de Ministros do Supremo Tribunal Federalcontenção judicialcourt curbingSupremo Tribunal FederalimpeachmentCourt curbingImpeachmentJusticesSupreme CourtBrazilThe article has two interrelated objectives. The first is to review, classify and adapt to the Brazilian context the concept of court curbing, widely used in comparative literature to examine initiatives by members of the executive and legislative branches who seek to limit the effects of a court's actions, of its members, or of its decisions. To this end, a typology of these initiatives is formulated according to the type of target (decision, magistrate, court) and the intensity of the measure (low, medium, high) that apprehends the variety of phenomena captured by the concept. The second objective is to carry out an application of the concept and typology to the specific examination of a measure of court curbing in Brazil: requests for impeachment of Supreme Court justices. Based on descriptive statistics, we demonstrate that the increase in the number of these requests, observed from 2015 onwards, can only be effectively understood as court curbing from 2019 onwards, when congressmen and, subsequently, the President of the Republic himself began to adopt these initiatives in their interaction with the court. At the same time, we demonstrate that the growth of these initiatives is especially associated with the rise of right-wing parties in the ideological spectrum and that they arise especially in the context of inquiries reported by justice Alexandre de Moraes. Finally, we demonstrate how the gradual increase in the number of requests gave greater discretion to the President of the Federal Senate in his decision-making regarding the processing of these cases.O artigo possui dois objetivos interrelacionados. O primeiro é revisar, classificar e adaptar ao contexto brasileiro o conceito de contenção judicial (court curbing), amplamente empregado na literatura comparada para examinar iniciativas de integrantes dos Poderes Executivo e Legislativo que busquem limitar os efeitos da atuação de um tribunal, dos seus integrantes ou de suas decisões. Para tanto, formula-se uma tipologia dessas iniciativas em função do tipo de alvo (decisão, magistrado, tribunal) e intensidade da medida (baixa, média, alta) que permite apreender a variedade de fenômenos capturados pelo conceito. O segundo objetivo é realizar uma aplicação do conceito e da tipologia ao exame especifico de uma medida de contenção judicial: pedidos de impeachment de Ministros do Supremo Tribunal Federal. A partir de estatística descritiva, demonstramos que o incremento do número desses pedidos, observado a partir de 2015, somente pode ser efetivamente entendido como contenção judicial a partir de 2019, quando parlamentares e, posteriormente, o próprio Presidente da República passaram a adotar essas iniciativas em sua interação com o tribunal. Paralelamente, demonstramos que o crescimento dessas iniciativas está associado especialmente à ascensão de partidos de direita no espectro ideológico e se insurgem especialmente no âmbito de inquéritos relatados pelo Ministro Alexandre de Moraes. Por fim, demonstramos como o crescimento do número de pedidos gradativamente conferiu maior discricionaridade ao Presidente do Senado Federal em sua tomada de decisão quanto ao processamento desses casos.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2023-08-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/9386510.5007/2175-7984.2022.e93865Política & Sociedade; Vol. 21 No. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 184-225Política & Sociedade; Vol. 21 Núm. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 184-225Política & Sociedade; v. 21 n. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 184-2252175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/93865/54078http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDa Ros, LucianoBogéa, Daniel2023-08-23T17:26:57Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/93865Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2023-08-23T17:26:57Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices Contenção Judicial: mapa Conceitual e Pedidos de Impeachment de Ministros do Supremo Tribunal Federal |
title |
Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices |
spellingShingle |
Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices Da Ros, Luciano contenção judicial court curbing Supremo Tribunal Federal impeachment Court curbing Impeachment Justices Supreme Court Brazil |
title_short |
Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices |
title_full |
Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices |
title_fullStr |
Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices |
title_full_unstemmed |
Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices |
title_sort |
Court curbing: conceptual map and impeachment requests of Brazilian Supreme Court justices |
author |
Da Ros, Luciano |
author_facet |
Da Ros, Luciano Bogéa, Daniel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bogéa, Daniel |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Da Ros, Luciano Bogéa, Daniel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
contenção judicial court curbing Supremo Tribunal Federal impeachment Court curbing Impeachment Justices Supreme Court Brazil |
topic |
contenção judicial court curbing Supremo Tribunal Federal impeachment Court curbing Impeachment Justices Supreme Court Brazil |
description |
The article has two interrelated objectives. The first is to review, classify and adapt to the Brazilian context the concept of court curbing, widely used in comparative literature to examine initiatives by members of the executive and legislative branches who seek to limit the effects of a court's actions, of its members, or of its decisions. To this end, a typology of these initiatives is formulated according to the type of target (decision, magistrate, court) and the intensity of the measure (low, medium, high) that apprehends the variety of phenomena captured by the concept. The second objective is to carry out an application of the concept and typology to the specific examination of a measure of court curbing in Brazil: requests for impeachment of Supreme Court justices. Based on descriptive statistics, we demonstrate that the increase in the number of these requests, observed from 2015 onwards, can only be effectively understood as court curbing from 2019 onwards, when congressmen and, subsequently, the President of the Republic himself began to adopt these initiatives in their interaction with the court. At the same time, we demonstrate that the growth of these initiatives is especially associated with the rise of right-wing parties in the ideological spectrum and that they arise especially in the context of inquiries reported by justice Alexandre de Moraes. Finally, we demonstrate how the gradual increase in the number of requests gave greater discretion to the President of the Federal Senate in his decision-making regarding the processing of these cases. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-08-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/93865 10.5007/2175-7984.2022.e93865 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/93865 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-7984.2022.e93865 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/93865/54078 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 21 No. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 184-225 Política & Sociedade; Vol. 21 Núm. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 184-225 Política & Sociedade; v. 21 n. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 184-225 2175-7984 1677-4140 reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1799875159264329728 |