Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Thoreau, François
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Delvenne, Pierre
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Política & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2012v11n20p205
Resumo: In this paper we trace some of the key points in the history of Science and Technology Studies (STS). In particular we outline the inherently political dynamics of the field. Against We underline two emerging patterns in the curse of STS: the one of “depoliticisation” and the one of increasing “engagement”. We address the case study nanotechnologies and discuss their intertwined history with the STS. This allows us to point at the risk that the increasing institutionalisation of STS and the political mandate that frames and stabilizes the field’s relationship to the technological developments would create a political void. We conclude that STS research is at a crossroads. It is facing an important empirical turn, which may deprive it from its political significance, and constantly redefine its institutional constraints. STS has to continuously question its underlying political assumptions (as it occurs more and more regarding public participation) and to make it explicit.
id UFSC-18_6a81380c3c897e54f06321f4ce82fa1a
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/25051
network_acronym_str UFSC-18
network_name_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologiesIn this paper we trace some of the key points in the history of Science and Technology Studies (STS). In particular we outline the inherently political dynamics of the field. Against We underline two emerging patterns in the curse of STS: the one of “depoliticisation” and the one of increasing “engagement”. We address the case study nanotechnologies and discuss their intertwined history with the STS. This allows us to point at the risk that the increasing institutionalisation of STS and the political mandate that frames and stabilizes the field’s relationship to the technological developments would create a political void. We conclude that STS research is at a crossroads. It is facing an important empirical turn, which may deprive it from its political significance, and constantly redefine its institutional constraints. STS has to continuously question its underlying political assumptions (as it occurs more and more regarding public participation) and to make it explicit.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2012-06-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2012v11n20p20510.5007/2175-7984.2012v11n20p205Política & Sociedade; Vol. 11 No. 20 (2012); 205-226Política & Sociedade; Vol. 11 Núm. 20 (2012); 205-226Política & Sociedade; v. 11 n. 20 (2012); 205-2262175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2012v11n20p205/22115Copyright (c) 2012 Política & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessThoreau, FrançoisDelvenne, Pierre2022-11-21T14:13:39Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/25051Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2022-11-21T14:13:39Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies
title Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies
spellingShingle Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies
Thoreau, François
title_short Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies
title_full Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies
title_fullStr Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies
title_full_unstemmed Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies
title_sort Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies
author Thoreau, François
author_facet Thoreau, François
Delvenne, Pierre
author_role author
author2 Delvenne, Pierre
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Thoreau, François
Delvenne, Pierre
description In this paper we trace some of the key points in the history of Science and Technology Studies (STS). In particular we outline the inherently political dynamics of the field. Against We underline two emerging patterns in the curse of STS: the one of “depoliticisation” and the one of increasing “engagement”. We address the case study nanotechnologies and discuss their intertwined history with the STS. This allows us to point at the risk that the increasing institutionalisation of STS and the political mandate that frames and stabilizes the field’s relationship to the technological developments would create a political void. We conclude that STS research is at a crossroads. It is facing an important empirical turn, which may deprive it from its political significance, and constantly redefine its institutional constraints. STS has to continuously question its underlying political assumptions (as it occurs more and more regarding public participation) and to make it explicit.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-06-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2012v11n20p205
10.5007/2175-7984.2012v11n20p205
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2012v11n20p205
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-7984.2012v11n20p205
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2012v11n20p205/22115
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2012 Política & Sociedade
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2012 Política & Sociedade
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade; Vol. 11 No. 20 (2012); 205-226
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 11 Núm. 20 (2012); 205-226
Política & Sociedade; v. 11 n. 20 (2012); 205-226
2175-7984
1677-4140
reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
collection Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435204666916864