Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Pedro Luiz
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Política & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p377
Resumo: Through a comparative analysis of Jürgen Habermas and Antonio Negri’s democratic theories, the present article intends to clarify the conceptual foundations of both works. Its core consists in the discussion over the different inscriptions of each conception of democracy in a plane of immanence, with the premise that the cross-reading of these two authors favors a more acute comprehension of the theories’ structural components, normative implications and limits. This study’s main goal is to best define Negri’s and Habermas’ democratic theories as distinct alternatives (deliberation/substance), with some potential complementarities (e.g., the focus on consensus, be it as form or as content), that enable us to grasp the contemporary democratic dilemma.
id UFSC-18_990c15f562227ed40e6a7859d1910db7
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/39042
network_acronym_str UFSC-18
network_name_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen HabermasEntre o procedimento formal e o conteúdo selvagem: imanência e democracia em Jürgen Habermas e Antonio NegriThrough a comparative analysis of Jürgen Habermas and Antonio Negri’s democratic theories, the present article intends to clarify the conceptual foundations of both works. Its core consists in the discussion over the different inscriptions of each conception of democracy in a plane of immanence, with the premise that the cross-reading of these two authors favors a more acute comprehension of the theories’ structural components, normative implications and limits. This study’s main goal is to best define Negri’s and Habermas’ democratic theories as distinct alternatives (deliberation/substance), with some potential complementarities (e.g., the focus on consensus, be it as form or as content), that enable us to grasp the contemporary democratic dilemma.A partir de uma análise crítico-comparativa das teorias da democracia de Jürgen Habermas e Antonio Negri, o presente artigo busca esclarecer os fundamentos conceituais de ambas as obras, tomando como eixo a discussão sobre o modo pelo qual suas concepções de democracia se inscrevem, cada uma, em seu respectivo plano de imanência. Com a premissa de que a leitura cruzada desses dois autores favorece uma mais aguda compreensão dos componentes estruturantes, implicações normativas e limites de suas teorias, objetiva-se situá-las como alternativas distintas (deliberação/substância), e potencialmente complementares (entendido o consenso como forma e conteúdo), para se pensar a questão democrática contemporânea.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2017-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p37710.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n37p377Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 No. 37 (2017); 377-411Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 Núm. 37 (2017); 377-411Política & Sociedade; v. 16 n. 37 (2017); 377-4112175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p377/35982Copyright (c) 2018 Política & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Pedro Luiz2018-03-02T14:57:59Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/39042Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2018-03-02T14:57:59Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas
Entre o procedimento formal e o conteúdo selvagem: imanência e democracia em Jürgen Habermas e Antonio Negri
title Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas
spellingShingle Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas
Lima, Pedro Luiz
title_short Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas
title_full Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas
title_fullStr Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas
title_full_unstemmed Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas
title_sort Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas
author Lima, Pedro Luiz
author_facet Lima, Pedro Luiz
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Pedro Luiz
description Through a comparative analysis of Jürgen Habermas and Antonio Negri’s democratic theories, the present article intends to clarify the conceptual foundations of both works. Its core consists in the discussion over the different inscriptions of each conception of democracy in a plane of immanence, with the premise that the cross-reading of these two authors favors a more acute comprehension of the theories’ structural components, normative implications and limits. This study’s main goal is to best define Negri’s and Habermas’ democratic theories as distinct alternatives (deliberation/substance), with some potential complementarities (e.g., the focus on consensus, be it as form or as content), that enable us to grasp the contemporary democratic dilemma.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p377
10.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n37p377
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p377
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n37p377
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p377/35982
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Política & Sociedade
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Política & Sociedade
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 No. 37 (2017); 377-411
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 Núm. 37 (2017); 377-411
Política & Sociedade; v. 16 n. 37 (2017); 377-411
2175-7984
1677-4140
reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
collection Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435205034967040