Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Política & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p377 |
Resumo: | Through a comparative analysis of Jürgen Habermas and Antonio Negri’s democratic theories, the present article intends to clarify the conceptual foundations of both works. Its core consists in the discussion over the different inscriptions of each conception of democracy in a plane of immanence, with the premise that the cross-reading of these two authors favors a more acute comprehension of the theories’ structural components, normative implications and limits. This study’s main goal is to best define Negri’s and Habermas’ democratic theories as distinct alternatives (deliberation/substance), with some potential complementarities (e.g., the focus on consensus, be it as form or as content), that enable us to grasp the contemporary democratic dilemma. |
id |
UFSC-18_990c15f562227ed40e6a7859d1910db7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/39042 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-18 |
network_name_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen HabermasEntre o procedimento formal e o conteúdo selvagem: imanência e democracia em Jürgen Habermas e Antonio NegriThrough a comparative analysis of Jürgen Habermas and Antonio Negri’s democratic theories, the present article intends to clarify the conceptual foundations of both works. Its core consists in the discussion over the different inscriptions of each conception of democracy in a plane of immanence, with the premise that the cross-reading of these two authors favors a more acute comprehension of the theories’ structural components, normative implications and limits. This study’s main goal is to best define Negri’s and Habermas’ democratic theories as distinct alternatives (deliberation/substance), with some potential complementarities (e.g., the focus on consensus, be it as form or as content), that enable us to grasp the contemporary democratic dilemma.A partir de uma análise crítico-comparativa das teorias da democracia de Jürgen Habermas e Antonio Negri, o presente artigo busca esclarecer os fundamentos conceituais de ambas as obras, tomando como eixo a discussão sobre o modo pelo qual suas concepções de democracia se inscrevem, cada uma, em seu respectivo plano de imanência. Com a premissa de que a leitura cruzada desses dois autores favorece uma mais aguda compreensão dos componentes estruturantes, implicações normativas e limites de suas teorias, objetiva-se situá-las como alternativas distintas (deliberação/substância), e potencialmente complementares (entendido o consenso como forma e conteúdo), para se pensar a questão democrática contemporânea.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2017-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p37710.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n37p377Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 No. 37 (2017); 377-411Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 Núm. 37 (2017); 377-411Política & Sociedade; v. 16 n. 37 (2017); 377-4112175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p377/35982Copyright (c) 2018 Política & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Pedro Luiz2018-03-02T14:57:59Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/39042Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2018-03-02T14:57:59Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas Entre o procedimento formal e o conteúdo selvagem: imanência e democracia em Jürgen Habermas e Antonio Negri |
title |
Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas |
spellingShingle |
Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas Lima, Pedro Luiz |
title_short |
Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas |
title_full |
Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas |
title_fullStr |
Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas |
title_sort |
Between formal procedure and savage content: immanence and democracy in Antonio Negri and Jürgen Habermas |
author |
Lima, Pedro Luiz |
author_facet |
Lima, Pedro Luiz |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Pedro Luiz |
description |
Through a comparative analysis of Jürgen Habermas and Antonio Negri’s democratic theories, the present article intends to clarify the conceptual foundations of both works. Its core consists in the discussion over the different inscriptions of each conception of democracy in a plane of immanence, with the premise that the cross-reading of these two authors favors a more acute comprehension of the theories’ structural components, normative implications and limits. This study’s main goal is to best define Negri’s and Habermas’ democratic theories as distinct alternatives (deliberation/substance), with some potential complementarities (e.g., the focus on consensus, be it as form or as content), that enable us to grasp the contemporary democratic dilemma. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p377 10.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n37p377 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p377 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n37p377 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n37p377/35982 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Política & Sociedade info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Política & Sociedade |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 No. 37 (2017); 377-411 Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 Núm. 37 (2017); 377-411 Política & Sociedade; v. 16 n. 37 (2017); 377-411 2175-7984 1677-4140 reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435205034967040 |