People and elite in classical republicanism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Política & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p286 |
Resumo: | Within the scope of the Republican Revival, there is a renewed interest in Roman political thought. Formulations based on the republican tradition of political thought have entered the field of Political Theory since the neo-Roman argument was included in the debate on the concept of freedom. Correlated to this initial movement, republicanism is being employed to tackle an increasing of theoretical dilemmas. One currently debated topic is the role republicanism assigns to the democratic element in its political models. The aim of this paper is to analyze three key authors of Roman political thought – Cicero, Sallust and Lyvi – and their respective understandings of the role of the people and the democratic element in the political dynamics of Rome. I intend to convince the reader that modern interpretations may be making a mistake by seeking among these authors a clear justification for establishing the people as the protagonists of the political process. |
id |
UFSC-18_d7031b5acf5d9777c8d8ab89a79fa976 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/53121 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-18 |
network_name_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
People and elite in classical republicanismPovo e Elite no Republicanismo ClássicoWithin the scope of the Republican Revival, there is a renewed interest in Roman political thought. Formulations based on the republican tradition of political thought have entered the field of Political Theory since the neo-Roman argument was included in the debate on the concept of freedom. Correlated to this initial movement, republicanism is being employed to tackle an increasing of theoretical dilemmas. One currently debated topic is the role republicanism assigns to the democratic element in its political models. The aim of this paper is to analyze three key authors of Roman political thought – Cicero, Sallust and Lyvi – and their respective understandings of the role of the people and the democratic element in the political dynamics of Rome. I intend to convince the reader that modern interpretations may be making a mistake by seeking among these authors a clear justification for establishing the people as the protagonists of the political process.No bojo do Republican Revival, há um renovado interesse pelo pensamento político romano. A teoria política tem se nutrido das formulações alicerçadas na tradição republicana de pensamento político desde que o argumento neorromano foi incluído no debate sobre o conceito de liberdade. Correlato a este movimento inicial, atualmente está sendo alargado o conjunto de dilemas que poderia contar com a sugestão republicana. Um tema debatido atualmente é o papel conferido pelo republicanismo ao elemento democrático em seus modelos políticos. A intenção deste paper é analisar três autores- -chave do pensamento político romano – Cícero, Salústio e Lívio – e suas respectivas compreensões sobre o papel que cabe ao povo e ao elemento democrático na dinâmica política de Roma. Pretendo convencer o leitor de que a crítica moderna pode estar cometendo um equívoco ao procurar, entre estes autores, justificativas para apontar o povo como protagonista do processo político.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2018-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p28610.5007/2175-7984.2018v17n40p286Política & Sociedade; Vol. 17 No. 40 (2018); 286-306Política & Sociedade; Vol. 17 Núm. 40 (2018); 286-306Política & Sociedade; v. 17 n. 40 (2018); 286-3062175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p286/38992Copyright (c) 2019 Política & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLosso, Tiago2019-05-22T12:48:41Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/53121Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2019-05-22T12:48:41Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
People and elite in classical republicanism Povo e Elite no Republicanismo Clássico |
title |
People and elite in classical republicanism |
spellingShingle |
People and elite in classical republicanism Losso, Tiago |
title_short |
People and elite in classical republicanism |
title_full |
People and elite in classical republicanism |
title_fullStr |
People and elite in classical republicanism |
title_full_unstemmed |
People and elite in classical republicanism |
title_sort |
People and elite in classical republicanism |
author |
Losso, Tiago |
author_facet |
Losso, Tiago |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Losso, Tiago |
description |
Within the scope of the Republican Revival, there is a renewed interest in Roman political thought. Formulations based on the republican tradition of political thought have entered the field of Political Theory since the neo-Roman argument was included in the debate on the concept of freedom. Correlated to this initial movement, republicanism is being employed to tackle an increasing of theoretical dilemmas. One currently debated topic is the role republicanism assigns to the democratic element in its political models. The aim of this paper is to analyze three key authors of Roman political thought – Cicero, Sallust and Lyvi – and their respective understandings of the role of the people and the democratic element in the political dynamics of Rome. I intend to convince the reader that modern interpretations may be making a mistake by seeking among these authors a clear justification for establishing the people as the protagonists of the political process. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p286 10.5007/2175-7984.2018v17n40p286 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p286 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-7984.2018v17n40p286 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p286/38992 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Política & Sociedade info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Política & Sociedade |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 17 No. 40 (2018); 286-306 Política & Sociedade; Vol. 17 Núm. 40 (2018); 286-306 Política & Sociedade; v. 17 n. 40 (2018); 286-306 2175-7984 1677-4140 reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435205460688896 |