People and elite in classical republicanism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Losso, Tiago
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Política & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p286
Resumo: Within the scope of the Republican Revival, there is a renewed interest in Roman political thought. Formulations based on the republican tradition of political thought have entered the field of Political Theory since the neo-Roman argument was included in the debate on the concept of freedom. Correlated to this initial movement, republicanism is being employed to tackle an increasing of theoretical dilemmas. One currently debated topic is the role republicanism assigns to the democratic element in its political models. The aim of this paper is to analyze three key authors of Roman political thought – Cicero, Sallust and Lyvi – and their respective understandings of the role of the people and the democratic element in the political dynamics of Rome. I intend to convince the reader that modern interpretations may be making a mistake by seeking among these authors a clear justification for establishing the people as the protagonists of the political process.
id UFSC-18_d7031b5acf5d9777c8d8ab89a79fa976
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/53121
network_acronym_str UFSC-18
network_name_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling People and elite in classical republicanismPovo e Elite no Republicanismo ClássicoWithin the scope of the Republican Revival, there is a renewed interest in Roman political thought. Formulations based on the republican tradition of political thought have entered the field of Political Theory since the neo-Roman argument was included in the debate on the concept of freedom. Correlated to this initial movement, republicanism is being employed to tackle an increasing of theoretical dilemmas. One currently debated topic is the role republicanism assigns to the democratic element in its political models. The aim of this paper is to analyze three key authors of Roman political thought – Cicero, Sallust and Lyvi – and their respective understandings of the role of the people and the democratic element in the political dynamics of Rome. I intend to convince the reader that modern interpretations may be making a mistake by seeking among these authors a clear justification for establishing the people as the protagonists of the political process.No bojo do Republican Revival, há um renovado interesse pelo pensamento político romano. A teoria política tem se nutrido das formulações alicerçadas na tradição republicana de pensamento político desde que o argumento neorromano foi incluído no debate sobre o conceito de liberdade. Correlato a este movimento inicial, atualmente está sendo alargado o conjunto de dilemas que poderia contar com a sugestão republicana. Um tema debatido atualmente é o papel conferido pelo republicanismo ao elemento democrático em seus modelos políticos. A intenção deste paper é analisar três autores- -chave do pensamento político romano – Cícero, Salústio e Lívio – e suas respectivas compreensões sobre o papel que cabe ao povo e ao elemento democrático na dinâmica política de Roma. Pretendo convencer o leitor de que a crítica moderna pode estar cometendo um equívoco ao procurar, entre estes autores, justificativas para apontar o povo como protagonista do processo político.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2018-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p28610.5007/2175-7984.2018v17n40p286Política & Sociedade; Vol. 17 No. 40 (2018); 286-306Política & Sociedade; Vol. 17 Núm. 40 (2018); 286-306Política & Sociedade; v. 17 n. 40 (2018); 286-3062175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p286/38992Copyright (c) 2019 Política & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLosso, Tiago2019-05-22T12:48:41Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/53121Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2019-05-22T12:48:41Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv People and elite in classical republicanism
Povo e Elite no Republicanismo Clássico
title People and elite in classical republicanism
spellingShingle People and elite in classical republicanism
Losso, Tiago
title_short People and elite in classical republicanism
title_full People and elite in classical republicanism
title_fullStr People and elite in classical republicanism
title_full_unstemmed People and elite in classical republicanism
title_sort People and elite in classical republicanism
author Losso, Tiago
author_facet Losso, Tiago
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Losso, Tiago
description Within the scope of the Republican Revival, there is a renewed interest in Roman political thought. Formulations based on the republican tradition of political thought have entered the field of Political Theory since the neo-Roman argument was included in the debate on the concept of freedom. Correlated to this initial movement, republicanism is being employed to tackle an increasing of theoretical dilemmas. One currently debated topic is the role republicanism assigns to the democratic element in its political models. The aim of this paper is to analyze three key authors of Roman political thought – Cicero, Sallust and Lyvi – and their respective understandings of the role of the people and the democratic element in the political dynamics of Rome. I intend to convince the reader that modern interpretations may be making a mistake by seeking among these authors a clear justification for establishing the people as the protagonists of the political process.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p286
10.5007/2175-7984.2018v17n40p286
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p286
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-7984.2018v17n40p286
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p286/38992
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Política & Sociedade
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Política & Sociedade
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade; Vol. 17 No. 40 (2018); 286-306
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 17 Núm. 40 (2018); 286-306
Política & Sociedade; v. 17 n. 40 (2018); 286-306
2175-7984
1677-4140
reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
collection Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435205460688896