Max Weber’s political Analysis of the February Revolution of 1917: a crtical Review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Política & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/74416 |
Resumo: | This paper critically discusses Max Weber’s analysis of the political situation in Russia in 1917,particularly his article on the February Revolution [Russia’s transition to pseudo-democracy].We establish the links between this article and his writings on the Russian revolution of 1905,focusing on the analysis of social classes and the viability of a democratic coalition capableof supplanting tsarism. In 1917, Weber questions the democratic character of the “provisionalgovernment” and concludes that the revolutionary process was nothing but the annulment ofan incompetent monarch, without changing the conservative position of the ruling classes inrelation to the agrarian question, nor their dependence on foreign banks. Thus, we analyze themistakes that led Weber to disregard the possibility of an alliance between workers and peasants,as well as the insufficiencies of his theoretical scheme to include the dynamics of the massmovement in the historical transformation. |
id |
UFSC-18_f109524809cb6cf880054d1f5ff68d8d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/74416 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-18 |
network_name_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Max Weber’s political Analysis of the February Revolution of 1917: a crtical ReviewA análise política por Max Weber da Revolução de Fevereiro de 1917: Um balanço crítico.This paper critically discusses Max Weber’s analysis of the political situation in Russia in 1917,particularly his article on the February Revolution [Russia’s transition to pseudo-democracy].We establish the links between this article and his writings on the Russian revolution of 1905,focusing on the analysis of social classes and the viability of a democratic coalition capableof supplanting tsarism. In 1917, Weber questions the democratic character of the “provisionalgovernment” and concludes that the revolutionary process was nothing but the annulment ofan incompetent monarch, without changing the conservative position of the ruling classes inrelation to the agrarian question, nor their dependence on foreign banks. Thus, we analyze themistakes that led Weber to disregard the possibility of an alliance between workers and peasants,as well as the insufficiencies of his theoretical scheme to include the dynamics of the massmovement in the historical transformation.O presente trabalho discute criticamente a análise de Max Weber sobre a situação política da Rússia em 1917, particularmente seu artigo sobre a Revolução de Fevereiro [A transição da Rússia à pseudodemocracia]. Nele estabelecemos os nexos entre tal artigo e seus escritos dedicados à revolução russa de 1905, com ênfase para a análise das classes sociais e a viabilidade de uma coalizão democrática capaz de suplantar o czarismo. Em 1917, Weber questiona o caráter democrático do “governo provisório” e conclui que o processo revolucionário se resumiu à anulação de um monarca incompetente, sem alterar a posição conservadora das classes dominantes em relação à questão agrária, nem sua dependência perante os bancos estrangeiros. Assim, analisamos os equívocos que levaram Weber a desconsiderar a possibilidade de uma aliança entre operários e camponeses, bem como as insuficiências de seu esquema teórico para incluir a dinâmica do movimento de massas na transformação histórica.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2020-11-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/7441610.5007/175-7984.2020v19n45p152Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 No. 45 (2020); 152-177Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 Núm. 45 (2020); 152-177Política & Sociedade; v. 19 n. 45 (2020); 152-1772175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/74416/44717Copyright (c) 2020 Política & Sociedadehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Luiz Enrique Vieira deMusse, Ricardo2020-11-19T18:33:42Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/74416Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2020-11-19T18:33:42Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Max Weber’s political Analysis of the February Revolution of 1917: a crtical Review A análise política por Max Weber da Revolução de Fevereiro de 1917: Um balanço crítico. |
title |
Max Weber’s political Analysis of the February Revolution of 1917: a crtical Review |
spellingShingle |
Max Weber’s political Analysis of the February Revolution of 1917: a crtical Review Souza, Luiz Enrique Vieira de |
title_short |
Max Weber’s political Analysis of the February Revolution of 1917: a crtical Review |
title_full |
Max Weber’s political Analysis of the February Revolution of 1917: a crtical Review |
title_fullStr |
Max Weber’s political Analysis of the February Revolution of 1917: a crtical Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Max Weber’s political Analysis of the February Revolution of 1917: a crtical Review |
title_sort |
Max Weber’s political Analysis of the February Revolution of 1917: a crtical Review |
author |
Souza, Luiz Enrique Vieira de |
author_facet |
Souza, Luiz Enrique Vieira de Musse, Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Musse, Ricardo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Luiz Enrique Vieira de Musse, Ricardo |
description |
This paper critically discusses Max Weber’s analysis of the political situation in Russia in 1917,particularly his article on the February Revolution [Russia’s transition to pseudo-democracy].We establish the links between this article and his writings on the Russian revolution of 1905,focusing on the analysis of social classes and the viability of a democratic coalition capableof supplanting tsarism. In 1917, Weber questions the democratic character of the “provisionalgovernment” and concludes that the revolutionary process was nothing but the annulment ofan incompetent monarch, without changing the conservative position of the ruling classes inrelation to the agrarian question, nor their dependence on foreign banks. Thus, we analyze themistakes that led Weber to disregard the possibility of an alliance between workers and peasants,as well as the insufficiencies of his theoretical scheme to include the dynamics of the massmovement in the historical transformation. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/74416 10.5007/175-7984.2020v19n45p152 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/74416 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/175-7984.2020v19n45p152 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/74416/44717 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Política & Sociedade http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Política & Sociedade http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 No. 45 (2020); 152-177 Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 Núm. 45 (2020); 152-177 Política & Sociedade; v. 19 n. 45 (2020); 152-177 2175-7984 1677-4140 reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435206248169472 |