Criteria to evaluate printed materials of History of Science for Distance Education
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2014v31n2p429 |
Resumo: | This paper proposes criteria for the evaluation of printed materials (MDI) of History of Science for Undergraduate Distance Learning School. The construction of the criteria was based on official documents of Undergraduate and High School of Brazil, models of teacher training by Porlán and Rivero (1998) and in the theoretical History of Science teaching. The criteria were divided into five blocks: Block I: legislation, Block II: textual elements, Block III: Undergraduate student, Block IV: references, glossaries and answers and Block V: editorial design. Census Data, organized by the Brazilian Association for Distance Education (ABED, 2011) show that despite the increasing technological development, printed material is still the main learning object used by institutions for distance learning. The data from this census show a progress in the number of student enrollment in Distance Education between the years 2009 and 2011. The construction of the criteria for evaluation is relevant because this increase in enrollment in Distance Education signals a greater demand for the production of learning objects generating a concern on the quality of the content and exercises contained in these materials. Perhaps, the criteria to evaluate MDI of History of Science, that this article describes, are the beginning for the construction of criteria to evaluate MDI from other disciplines of EAD. This set of assessment instruments could be inserted into a desirable National Textbook Program for Undergraduate Distance Learning Courses, aiming to improve the quality of these materials. |
id |
UFSC-19_366f9fd478e2c7b81f1bdf233e6e123d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/31050 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-19 |
network_name_str |
Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Criteria to evaluate printed materials of History of Science for Distance EducationCritérios para a Avaliação de Materiais Didáticos Impressos de História da Ciência para a Educação a DistânciaThis paper proposes criteria for the evaluation of printed materials (MDI) of History of Science for Undergraduate Distance Learning School. The construction of the criteria was based on official documents of Undergraduate and High School of Brazil, models of teacher training by Porlán and Rivero (1998) and in the theoretical History of Science teaching. The criteria were divided into five blocks: Block I: legislation, Block II: textual elements, Block III: Undergraduate student, Block IV: references, glossaries and answers and Block V: editorial design. Census Data, organized by the Brazilian Association for Distance Education (ABED, 2011) show that despite the increasing technological development, printed material is still the main learning object used by institutions for distance learning. The data from this census show a progress in the number of student enrollment in Distance Education between the years 2009 and 2011. The construction of the criteria for evaluation is relevant because this increase in enrollment in Distance Education signals a greater demand for the production of learning objects generating a concern on the quality of the content and exercises contained in these materials. Perhaps, the criteria to evaluate MDI of History of Science, that this article describes, are the beginning for the construction of criteria to evaluate MDI from other disciplines of EAD. This set of assessment instruments could be inserted into a desirable National Textbook Program for Undergraduate Distance Learning Courses, aiming to improve the quality of these materials.Este artigo propõe critérios para a avaliação de materiais didáticos impressos (MDI) sobre história da ciência para a educação a distância (EAD). A construção dos critérios foi baseada nos documentos oficiais do ensino superior e médio do Brasil, em modelos de aprendizagens de professores descritos por Porlán and Rivero (1998), em livros da EAD e nos referenciais teóricos da história das ciências no ensino. Os critérios foram divididos em cinco blocos: Bloco I: legislação; Bloco II: elementos textuais; Bloco III: aluno da licenciatura; Bloco IV: referências, glossários e respostas e; Bloco V: projeto editorial. Dados do Censo, organizados pela Associação Brasileira de Educação a Distância (ABED, 2011) revelam que apesar do crescente desenvolvimento tecnológico, o material didático impresso ainda é o principal objeto de aprendizagem utilizado pelas instituições de ensino a distância. Os dados desse censo mostram uma evolução do número de matrículas dos alunos na Educação a Distância (EAD) entre os anos de 2009 e 2011. A construção dos critérios para a avaliação de MDI é relevante porque esse incremento de matrículas na EAD sinaliza para uma demanda maior de produção de objetos de aprendizagem gerando uma preocupação com a qualidade dos conteúdos e das atividades presentes nesses materiais. Talvez, os critérios para a avaliação de MDI de história da ciência, descritos nesse artigo, sejam o embrião para a construção de critérios para avaliar MDI de outras disciplinas da EAD. O conjunto desses instrumentos de avaliação poderia ser inserido em um desejável Programa Nacional do Livro Didático para os cursos superiores a distância, com o objetivo de melhorar a qualidade desses materiais.Imprensa Universitária - UFSC2014-04-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2014v31n2p42910.5007/2175-7941.2014v31n2p429Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física; v. 31 n. 2 (2014); 429-4622175-79411677-2334reponame:Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2014v31n2p429/27328Junior, Edmundo RodriguesLuna, Fernando J.Linhares, Marília Paixãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-03-16T10:25:22Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/31050Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/oaicbefisica@gmail.com||fscccef@fsc.ufsc.br|| cbefisica@gmail.com2175-79411677-2334opendoar:2018-03-16T10:25:22Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Criteria to evaluate printed materials of History of Science for Distance Education Critérios para a Avaliação de Materiais Didáticos Impressos de História da Ciência para a Educação a Distância |
title |
Criteria to evaluate printed materials of History of Science for Distance Education |
spellingShingle |
Criteria to evaluate printed materials of History of Science for Distance Education Junior, Edmundo Rodrigues |
title_short |
Criteria to evaluate printed materials of History of Science for Distance Education |
title_full |
Criteria to evaluate printed materials of History of Science for Distance Education |
title_fullStr |
Criteria to evaluate printed materials of History of Science for Distance Education |
title_full_unstemmed |
Criteria to evaluate printed materials of History of Science for Distance Education |
title_sort |
Criteria to evaluate printed materials of History of Science for Distance Education |
author |
Junior, Edmundo Rodrigues |
author_facet |
Junior, Edmundo Rodrigues Luna, Fernando J. Linhares, Marília Paixão |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Luna, Fernando J. Linhares, Marília Paixão |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Junior, Edmundo Rodrigues Luna, Fernando J. Linhares, Marília Paixão |
description |
This paper proposes criteria for the evaluation of printed materials (MDI) of History of Science for Undergraduate Distance Learning School. The construction of the criteria was based on official documents of Undergraduate and High School of Brazil, models of teacher training by Porlán and Rivero (1998) and in the theoretical History of Science teaching. The criteria were divided into five blocks: Block I: legislation, Block II: textual elements, Block III: Undergraduate student, Block IV: references, glossaries and answers and Block V: editorial design. Census Data, organized by the Brazilian Association for Distance Education (ABED, 2011) show that despite the increasing technological development, printed material is still the main learning object used by institutions for distance learning. The data from this census show a progress in the number of student enrollment in Distance Education between the years 2009 and 2011. The construction of the criteria for evaluation is relevant because this increase in enrollment in Distance Education signals a greater demand for the production of learning objects generating a concern on the quality of the content and exercises contained in these materials. Perhaps, the criteria to evaluate MDI of History of Science, that this article describes, are the beginning for the construction of criteria to evaluate MDI from other disciplines of EAD. This set of assessment instruments could be inserted into a desirable National Textbook Program for Undergraduate Distance Learning Courses, aiming to improve the quality of these materials. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-04-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2014v31n2p429 10.5007/2175-7941.2014v31n2p429 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2014v31n2p429 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-7941.2014v31n2p429 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2014v31n2p429/27328 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Imprensa Universitária - UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Imprensa Universitária - UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física; v. 31 n. 2 (2014); 429-462 2175-7941 1677-2334 reponame:Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online) |
collection |
Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cbefisica@gmail.com||fscccef@fsc.ufsc.br|| cbefisica@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799940573307600896 |