Influences of modern science on archival discourse
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ágora (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://agora.emnuvens.com.br/ra/article/view/1184 |
Resumo: | Analyzes and identifies distinctive impressions of modern science in the discourse of archival science. To do so, it investigates modernity, positivist philosophy, and modern science, aiming to recognize their epistemological principles and methodological rules. It selects principles and foundations that support archival thinking and attempts to verify influences inherited from modern science in the discipline's discursive formation. It undertakes theoretical research with a qualitative and exploratory-descriptive approach. It uses the cross-history method and the archaeology of knowledge approach to analyze bibliographic sources in light of an in-depth debate on history and comparison, seeking to identify statements specific to the discursive formation of archival science. It verifies that modernity inaugurates a common discursive field, and that modern scientific knowledge is built on the pillars of order, separability, and reason. It notes that modern science imprints in the discourse of archival science characteristics related to objectivity, universality, neutrality, formulation of general laws, identification of regularities, separation, quantification, classification, and determination of systematic relationships. It concludes that the foundations of archival science are guided by the modern ideal of truth, based on the scientific method and Cartesian rationalism, as well as directly influenced by the methodology of natural sciences, with the main examples being the use of geological perspectives and biological metaphors. |
id |
UFSC-20_f4a9b7498b4bccf65735955886ff60c6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.agora.emnuvens.com.br:article/1184 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-20 |
network_name_str |
Ágora (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Influences of modern science on archival discourseInfluencias de la ciencia moderna en el discurso archivísticoInfluxos da ciência moderna no discurso arquivísticoArchival ScienceModernityPositivism.Modern Science. Discourse.Arquivologia. Modernidade. Positivismo. Ciência Moderna. Discurso.Archivología ModernidadPositivismoCiencia moderna DiscursoAnalyzes and identifies distinctive impressions of modern science in the discourse of archival science. To do so, it investigates modernity, positivist philosophy, and modern science, aiming to recognize their epistemological principles and methodological rules. It selects principles and foundations that support archival thinking and attempts to verify influences inherited from modern science in the discipline's discursive formation. It undertakes theoretical research with a qualitative and exploratory-descriptive approach. It uses the cross-history method and the archaeology of knowledge approach to analyze bibliographic sources in light of an in-depth debate on history and comparison, seeking to identify statements specific to the discursive formation of archival science. It verifies that modernity inaugurates a common discursive field, and that modern scientific knowledge is built on the pillars of order, separability, and reason. It notes that modern science imprints in the discourse of archival science characteristics related to objectivity, universality, neutrality, formulation of general laws, identification of regularities, separation, quantification, classification, and determination of systematic relationships. It concludes that the foundations of archival science are guided by the modern ideal of truth, based on the scientific method and Cartesian rationalism, as well as directly influenced by the methodology of natural sciences, with the main examples being the use of geological perspectives and biological metaphors.Este trabajo analiza e identifica impresiones contrastivas de la ciencia moderna en el discurso de Archivología. Para lograrlo, se investiga la Modernidad, la filosofía positivista y la ciencia moderna en busca del descubrimiento de sus principios epistemológicos y de sus estrategias metodológicas. Se eligen principios y fundamentos que sostengan el pensamiento archivístico y se intenta averiguar en la formación discursiva de la disciplina, influencias heredadas desde la ciencia moderna. Se emprende una investigación teórica, cualitativa, de carácter exploratorio-descriptivo. Se utiliza el método del cruce de historias y el abordaje de la arqueología de los saberes para el análisis de la bibliografía frente al largo debate acerca de la historia y de la comparación, buscando identificar enunciados propios de la formación discursiva de la archivología. Se averigua que la modernidad inicia un campo discursivo común y que el saber científico moderno se construye bajo los pilares del orden, de la separabilidad y de la razón. Se constata que la ciencia moderna produce en el discurso de la Archivología características relatas a la objetividad, a la universalidad, a la neutralidad, a la formulación de leyes, a la identificación de regularidades, a la separación, a la cuantificación, a la clasificación y a la determinación de relaciones sistemáticas. Se concluye que los fundamentos de la archivología son gestionados por el ideal verdaderamente moderno, basado en metodología científica y en el racionalismo cartesiano, bien como es influido directamente por la metodología de las ciencias naturales, teniendo como principal ejemplo los usos de perspectivas geológicas y de metáforas biológicas.Demonstra e discute impressões distintivas da Ciência Moderna no discurso da Arquivologia. Para isso, investiga a Modernidade, a filosofia positivista e a Ciência Moderna visando ao reconhecimento de seus princípios epistemológicos e regras metodológicas. Elege princípios e fundamentos que sustentam o pensamento arquivístico e intenta verificar na formação discursiva da disciplina influências herdadas da Ciência Moderna. Empreende pesquisa teórica, com abordagem qualitativa e de caráter exploratório-descritivo. Utiliza o método da história cruzada e a abordagem da arqueologia dos saberes para analisar fontes bibliográficas à luz de um debate aprofundado sobre história e comparação buscando identificar enunciados próprios da formação discursiva da Arquivologia. Verifica que a Modernidade inaugura um campo discursivo comum e que o saber científico moderno se edifica sob os pilares da ordem, da separabilidade e da razão. Constata que a Ciência Moderna imprime no discurso da Arquivologia características relativas à objetividade, universalidade, neutralidade, formulação de leis gerais, identificação de regularidades, separação, quantificação, classificação e determinação de relações sistemáticas. Conclui que os fundamentos da Arquivologia são guiados pelo ideal de verdade moderno, baseiam-se no método científico e no racionalismo cartesiano, bem como recebem influências diretas da metodologia das Ciências Naturais, tendo como principais exemplos os usos de perspectivas geológicas e de metáforas biológicas.CIN - CED - UFSC2024-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpalavras chavesapplication/pdfhttps://agora.emnuvens.com.br/ra/article/view/1184ÁGORA: Arquivologia em debate; Vol. 34 No. 68 (2024); 1-22ÁGORA: Arquivologia em debate; v. 34 n. 68 (2024); 1-222763-90450103-3557reponame:Ágora (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://agora.emnuvens.com.br/ra/article/view/1184/1094Copyright (c) 2023 Cássio Murilo Alves Costa Filho, Renato Tarciso Barbosa de Sousa, Angelica Alves da Cunha Marqueshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Costa Filho, Cássio Murilo AlvesSousa, Renato Tarciso Barbosa deMarques, Angelica Alves da Cunha2024-01-01T12:55:48Zoai:ojs.agora.emnuvens.com.br:article/1184Revistahttps://agora.emnuvens.com.br/raPUBhttps://agora.emnuvens.com.br/ra/oairevista.agora@contato.ufsc.br||ursula.blattmann@ufsc.br2763-90450103-3557opendoar:2024-01-01T12:55:48Ágora (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influences of modern science on archival discourse Influencias de la ciencia moderna en el discurso archivístico Influxos da ciência moderna no discurso arquivístico |
title |
Influences of modern science on archival discourse |
spellingShingle |
Influences of modern science on archival discourse Costa Filho, Cássio Murilo Alves Archival Science Modernity Positivism. Modern Science. Discourse. Arquivologia. Modernidade. Positivismo. Ciência Moderna. Discurso. Archivología Modernidad Positivismo Ciencia moderna Discurso |
title_short |
Influences of modern science on archival discourse |
title_full |
Influences of modern science on archival discourse |
title_fullStr |
Influences of modern science on archival discourse |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influences of modern science on archival discourse |
title_sort |
Influences of modern science on archival discourse |
author |
Costa Filho, Cássio Murilo Alves |
author_facet |
Costa Filho, Cássio Murilo Alves Sousa, Renato Tarciso Barbosa de Marques, Angelica Alves da Cunha |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sousa, Renato Tarciso Barbosa de Marques, Angelica Alves da Cunha |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa Filho, Cássio Murilo Alves Sousa, Renato Tarciso Barbosa de Marques, Angelica Alves da Cunha |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Archival Science Modernity Positivism. Modern Science. Discourse. Arquivologia. Modernidade. Positivismo. Ciência Moderna. Discurso. Archivología Modernidad Positivismo Ciencia moderna Discurso |
topic |
Archival Science Modernity Positivism. Modern Science. Discourse. Arquivologia. Modernidade. Positivismo. Ciência Moderna. Discurso. Archivología Modernidad Positivismo Ciencia moderna Discurso |
description |
Analyzes and identifies distinctive impressions of modern science in the discourse of archival science. To do so, it investigates modernity, positivist philosophy, and modern science, aiming to recognize their epistemological principles and methodological rules. It selects principles and foundations that support archival thinking and attempts to verify influences inherited from modern science in the discipline's discursive formation. It undertakes theoretical research with a qualitative and exploratory-descriptive approach. It uses the cross-history method and the archaeology of knowledge approach to analyze bibliographic sources in light of an in-depth debate on history and comparison, seeking to identify statements specific to the discursive formation of archival science. It verifies that modernity inaugurates a common discursive field, and that modern scientific knowledge is built on the pillars of order, separability, and reason. It notes that modern science imprints in the discourse of archival science characteristics related to objectivity, universality, neutrality, formulation of general laws, identification of regularities, separation, quantification, classification, and determination of systematic relationships. It concludes that the foundations of archival science are guided by the modern ideal of truth, based on the scientific method and Cartesian rationalism, as well as directly influenced by the methodology of natural sciences, with the main examples being the use of geological perspectives and biological metaphors. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion palavras chaves |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://agora.emnuvens.com.br/ra/article/view/1184 |
url |
https://agora.emnuvens.com.br/ra/article/view/1184 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://agora.emnuvens.com.br/ra/article/view/1184/1094 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
CIN - CED - UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
CIN - CED - UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ÁGORA: Arquivologia em debate; Vol. 34 No. 68 (2024); 1-22 ÁGORA: Arquivologia em debate; v. 34 n. 68 (2024); 1-22 2763-9045 0103-3557 reponame:Ágora (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Ágora (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Ágora (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ágora (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.agora@contato.ufsc.br||ursula.blattmann@ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1792206946208579584 |