Monitoring and control metacognitive in solving problems in physics: analysis of a comparative study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Alexandria (Florianópolis) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/1982-5153.2017v10n2p105 |
Resumo: | The present work aims to investigate the activity of pencil-paper problem solving regarding the importance of providing students with moments of awareness about their knowledge, stimulation of monitoring, and exercise of control over actions. Particularly, the study seeks to assess academic performance of high school students in pencil-paper problem solving situations, guided by instructions that require them to recreate the title and illustrate the problem using their previous knowledge. The theoretical basis is linked to the introduction of metacognitive learning strategies as potential aid for students in understanding and solving Physics problems. The qualitative investigation seeks to analyze and compare two classes of the first year of high school - one class was instructed to use metacognitive thinking and the other one was not - regarding their academic performances faced with four classic kinematics problems. The results indicate that the didactic proposal involving the use of metacognitive learning strategies is more efficient in terms of student dialog with the problems presented aiming to solve them, and the number of right answers in the questions proposed. |
id |
UFSC-23_b1993ef16ddac605249678f2de10e92c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/45629 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-23 |
network_name_str |
Alexandria (Florianópolis) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Monitoring and control metacognitive in solving problems in physics: analysis of a comparative studyMonitoramento e controle metacognitivo na resolução de problemas em física: análise de um estudo comparativoThe present work aims to investigate the activity of pencil-paper problem solving regarding the importance of providing students with moments of awareness about their knowledge, stimulation of monitoring, and exercise of control over actions. Particularly, the study seeks to assess academic performance of high school students in pencil-paper problem solving situations, guided by instructions that require them to recreate the title and illustrate the problem using their previous knowledge. The theoretical basis is linked to the introduction of metacognitive learning strategies as potential aid for students in understanding and solving Physics problems. The qualitative investigation seeks to analyze and compare two classes of the first year of high school - one class was instructed to use metacognitive thinking and the other one was not - regarding their academic performances faced with four classic kinematics problems. The results indicate that the didactic proposal involving the use of metacognitive learning strategies is more efficient in terms of student dialog with the problems presented aiming to solve them, and the number of right answers in the questions proposed.O presente trabalho tem a finalidade de investigar a atividade de resolução de problemas do tipo lápis e papel, em termos da importância de se favorecer aos estudantes momentos de tomada de consciência sobre seus conhecimentos, de estimular a monitoração e de exercer o controle das ações. De forma mais específica, o estudo busca avaliar o desempenho acadêmico dos estudantes do ensino médio em situações de resolução de problemas do tipo lápis e papel, quando guiados por instruções que levam à necessidade de reelaborar o enunciado e ilustrar o problema utilizando os seus conhecimentos prévios. O embasamento teórico encontra-se vinculado à inserção de estratégias de aprendizagem metacognitivas como possibilidade de auxiliar os estudantes na compreensão e solução dos problemas em Física. A investigação, de cunho qualitativo, busca analisar e comparar duas turmas de primeiro ano do ensino médio – sendo uma orientada para recorrer ao pensamento metacognitivo e outra não – quanto aos seus desempenhos acadêmicos, diante de quatro problemas clássicos de cinemática. Os resultados apontam que a proposta didática envolvendo o uso de estratégia de aprendizagem metacognitiva mostra-se mais eficiente em termos de diálogos dos alunos com os problemas apresentados, na busca por solucionar os problemas, e do número de acertos nas questões propostas. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2017-11-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/1982-5153.2017v10n2p10510.5007/1982-5153.2017v10n2p105Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia; v. 10 n. 2 (2017); 105-1251982-5153reponame:Alexandria (Florianópolis)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/1982-5153.2017v10n2p105/35387Copyright (c) 2017 Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Rosa, Cleci T. WernerGhiggi, Caroline Maria2018-03-16T11:16:20Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/45629Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/oai1982-51531982-5153opendoar:2018-03-16T11:16:20Alexandria (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Monitoring and control metacognitive in solving problems in physics: analysis of a comparative study Monitoramento e controle metacognitivo na resolução de problemas em física: análise de um estudo comparativo |
title |
Monitoring and control metacognitive in solving problems in physics: analysis of a comparative study |
spellingShingle |
Monitoring and control metacognitive in solving problems in physics: analysis of a comparative study da Rosa, Cleci T. Werner |
title_short |
Monitoring and control metacognitive in solving problems in physics: analysis of a comparative study |
title_full |
Monitoring and control metacognitive in solving problems in physics: analysis of a comparative study |
title_fullStr |
Monitoring and control metacognitive in solving problems in physics: analysis of a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Monitoring and control metacognitive in solving problems in physics: analysis of a comparative study |
title_sort |
Monitoring and control metacognitive in solving problems in physics: analysis of a comparative study |
author |
da Rosa, Cleci T. Werner |
author_facet |
da Rosa, Cleci T. Werner Ghiggi, Caroline Maria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ghiggi, Caroline Maria |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Rosa, Cleci T. Werner Ghiggi, Caroline Maria |
description |
The present work aims to investigate the activity of pencil-paper problem solving regarding the importance of providing students with moments of awareness about their knowledge, stimulation of monitoring, and exercise of control over actions. Particularly, the study seeks to assess academic performance of high school students in pencil-paper problem solving situations, guided by instructions that require them to recreate the title and illustrate the problem using their previous knowledge. The theoretical basis is linked to the introduction of metacognitive learning strategies as potential aid for students in understanding and solving Physics problems. The qualitative investigation seeks to analyze and compare two classes of the first year of high school - one class was instructed to use metacognitive thinking and the other one was not - regarding their academic performances faced with four classic kinematics problems. The results indicate that the didactic proposal involving the use of metacognitive learning strategies is more efficient in terms of student dialog with the problems presented aiming to solve them, and the number of right answers in the questions proposed. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-11-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/1982-5153.2017v10n2p105 10.5007/1982-5153.2017v10n2p105 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/1982-5153.2017v10n2p105 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1982-5153.2017v10n2p105 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/1982-5153.2017v10n2p105/35387 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia; v. 10 n. 2 (2017); 105-125 1982-5153 reponame:Alexandria (Florianópolis) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Alexandria (Florianópolis) |
collection |
Alexandria (Florianópolis) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Alexandria (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808843264407633920 |