Dimensions of reliability in scientific claims and functional knowledge of nature of science

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mendonça, Paula Cristina Cardoso
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Thais Mara Anastácio, Almeida, Beatriz Carvalho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Alexandria (Florianópolis)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/71898
Resumo: We investigated how Chemistry preservice teachers used Nature of Science (NOS) knowledge in a functional way in the analysis of scientific claims related to a contemporary case about Genetically Modified Organisms. We adopted as items of analysis the dimensions of the reliability of scientific claims proposed by Allchin (2011). We developed criteria to judge the functionality of the analysis: (a) scientific claims and practices related to them were critically examined, avoiding the presentation of hasty conclusions; (b) the available scientific data were used to support the position with evidence and (c) mere statements of aspects of NOS were avoided. The analysis explored the preservice teacher’s knowledge of NOS in addition to the declarative dimension, because we identified the consistency of use with the justification established by the preservice teachers in positioning. In this sense, we believe that the article presents contributions to the field by making the possible criteria’s of analysis clears in the perspective pointed out by Allchin.
id UFSC-23_d53e7c5ea8a6e385b5d67b5c699ec7df
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/71898
network_acronym_str UFSC-23
network_name_str Alexandria (Florianópolis)
repository_id_str
spelling Dimensions of reliability in scientific claims and functional knowledge of nature of scienceDimensões de credibilidade de afirmativas científicas e conhecimento funcional de natureza da ciência We investigated how Chemistry preservice teachers used Nature of Science (NOS) knowledge in a functional way in the analysis of scientific claims related to a contemporary case about Genetically Modified Organisms. We adopted as items of analysis the dimensions of the reliability of scientific claims proposed by Allchin (2011). We developed criteria to judge the functionality of the analysis: (a) scientific claims and practices related to them were critically examined, avoiding the presentation of hasty conclusions; (b) the available scientific data were used to support the position with evidence and (c) mere statements of aspects of NOS were avoided. The analysis explored the preservice teacher’s knowledge of NOS in addition to the declarative dimension, because we identified the consistency of use with the justification established by the preservice teachers in positioning. In this sense, we believe that the article presents contributions to the field by making the possible criteria’s of analysis clears in the perspective pointed out by Allchin.Investigamos como licenciandos em Química mobilizam conhecimentos de Natureza da Ciência (NdC) de maneira funcional na análise de afirmativas científicas relacionadas a um caso contemporâneo sobre os Organismos Geneticamente Modificados. Adotamos como referencial teórico os itens de dimensão de credibilidade de afirmativas científicas de Allchin (2011). Elaboramos critérios para julgar a funcionalidade da análise: (a) foram criticamente examinadas as afirmativas científicas e as práticas relacionadas a elas, evitando a apresentação de conclusões precipitadas; (b) os dados científicos disponibilizados foram usados para fundamentar o posicionamento com evidências e (c) meras declarações de aspectos de NdC foram evitadas. A análise explorou o conhecimento de NdC dos licenciandos além da dimensão declarativa, porque identificamos a coerência do uso com a justificativa estabelecida pelo licenciando no seu posicionamento. Nesse sentido, julgamos que o trabalho apresenta contribuições a área ao tornar mais claro que possíveis critérios utilizar para avaliar os conhecimentos de NdC na perspectiva apontada por Allchin.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2021-05-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/7189810.5007/1982-5153.2021.e71898Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia; v. 14 n. 1 (2021); 367-3951982-5153reponame:Alexandria (Florianópolis)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/71898/46133Copyright (c) 2021 Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMendonça, Paula Cristina CardosoOliveira, Thais Mara AnastácioAlmeida, Beatriz Carvalho2021-05-21T20:02:42Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/71898Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/oai1982-51531982-5153opendoar:2021-05-21T20:02:42Alexandria (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dimensions of reliability in scientific claims and functional knowledge of nature of science
Dimensões de credibilidade de afirmativas científicas e conhecimento funcional de natureza da ciência
title Dimensions of reliability in scientific claims and functional knowledge of nature of science
spellingShingle Dimensions of reliability in scientific claims and functional knowledge of nature of science
Mendonça, Paula Cristina Cardoso
title_short Dimensions of reliability in scientific claims and functional knowledge of nature of science
title_full Dimensions of reliability in scientific claims and functional knowledge of nature of science
title_fullStr Dimensions of reliability in scientific claims and functional knowledge of nature of science
title_full_unstemmed Dimensions of reliability in scientific claims and functional knowledge of nature of science
title_sort Dimensions of reliability in scientific claims and functional knowledge of nature of science
author Mendonça, Paula Cristina Cardoso
author_facet Mendonça, Paula Cristina Cardoso
Oliveira, Thais Mara Anastácio
Almeida, Beatriz Carvalho
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Thais Mara Anastácio
Almeida, Beatriz Carvalho
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendonça, Paula Cristina Cardoso
Oliveira, Thais Mara Anastácio
Almeida, Beatriz Carvalho
description We investigated how Chemistry preservice teachers used Nature of Science (NOS) knowledge in a functional way in the analysis of scientific claims related to a contemporary case about Genetically Modified Organisms. We adopted as items of analysis the dimensions of the reliability of scientific claims proposed by Allchin (2011). We developed criteria to judge the functionality of the analysis: (a) scientific claims and practices related to them were critically examined, avoiding the presentation of hasty conclusions; (b) the available scientific data were used to support the position with evidence and (c) mere statements of aspects of NOS were avoided. The analysis explored the preservice teacher’s knowledge of NOS in addition to the declarative dimension, because we identified the consistency of use with the justification established by the preservice teachers in positioning. In this sense, we believe that the article presents contributions to the field by making the possible criteria’s of analysis clears in the perspective pointed out by Allchin.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/71898
10.5007/1982-5153.2021.e71898
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/71898
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1982-5153.2021.e71898
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/71898/46133
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia; v. 14 n. 1 (2021); 367-395
1982-5153
reponame:Alexandria (Florianópolis)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Alexandria (Florianópolis)
collection Alexandria (Florianópolis)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Alexandria (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798313453960560640