The canon or the playlist of the webdocumentary
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Texto digital |
DOI: | 10.5007/1807-9288.2020v16n2p298 |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/77564 |
Resumo: | All art has its own canon. Digital creation is clearly an artistic creation, which includes the webdocumentary. In this sense, it is legitimate to ask whether the webdocumentary has a canon. In order to discuss this issue, I focus on the MIT Open Documentary Lab website, a well-recognized entity in digital creation, where professionals, academics and critics chose webdocumentaries of their preference and presented the reasons for their choices. I begin by noting that the term “canon” is absent, playlist is the term used. In the first part of the text, after a brief discussion about “canon” and playlist, data about the playlists are presented and I create a super playlist, that is, a list of the most voted webdocumentaries. Then, I read the comments in order to understand what qualities are highlighted there. This reading intends to contribute to a knowledge of the webdocumentary as an activity of artistic creation, as well as the qualities of specific works that were highlighted by the critical eye of specialists. |
id |
UFSC-27_5917ee4b68b17a9e3e5bf69204c0620d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/77564 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-27 |
network_name_str |
Texto digital |
spelling |
The canon or the playlist of the webdocumentaryO cânone ou a playlist do webdocumentárioAll art has its own canon. Digital creation is clearly an artistic creation, which includes the webdocumentary. In this sense, it is legitimate to ask whether the webdocumentary has a canon. In order to discuss this issue, I focus on the MIT Open Documentary Lab website, a well-recognized entity in digital creation, where professionals, academics and critics chose webdocumentaries of their preference and presented the reasons for their choices. I begin by noting that the term “canon” is absent, playlist is the term used. In the first part of the text, after a brief discussion about “canon” and playlist, data about the playlists are presented and I create a super playlist, that is, a list of the most voted webdocumentaries. Then, I read the comments in order to understand what qualities are highlighted there. This reading intends to contribute to a knowledge of the webdocumentary as an activity of artistic creation, as well as the qualities of specific works that were highlighted by the critical eye of specialists.Toda a arte possui o seu próprio cânone. A criação digital é, claramente, uma criação artística, onde se inclui o webdocumentário. Nesse sentido, é legítimo perguntar se o webdocumentário possui um cânone. De modo a discutir esta questão, coloco o enfoque no site do MIT Open Documentary Lab, uma entidade sobejamente reconhecida na criação digital, onde profissionais, académicos e críticos escolheram webdocumentários da sua predileção e apresentaram as razões das suas escolhas. Começo por observar que o termo “cânone” está ausente, playlist é o termo utilizado. Na primeira parte do texto, após breve discussão sobre os termos cânone e playlist apresentam-se dados sobre as playlists e elaboro uma super-playlist ou seja, uma listagem dos webdocumentários mais votados. Seguidamente, procedo a uma leitura dos comentários a fim de compreender que qualidades são aí destacadas. Esta leitura pretende contribuir para um conhecimento do webdocumentário como atividade de criação artística, assim como as qualidades de obras específicas que foram destacadas pelo olhar crítico de especialistas.Center for Research in Computing, Literature, and Linguistics (NuPILL)2020-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/7756410.5007/1807-9288.2020v16n2p298Texto Digital; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): Imagens e imaginários na era digital/virtual; 298-308Texto Digital; Vol. 16 No 2 (2020): Imagens e imaginários na era digital/virtual; 298-308Texto Digital; v. 16 n. 2 (2020): Imagens e imaginários na era digital/virtual; 298-3081807-9288reponame:Texto digitalinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/77564/45073Copyright (c) 2020 Manuela Penafriahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPenafria, Manuela2020-12-22T21:32:02Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/77564Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigitalPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/oaitextodigital@cce.ufsc.br1807-92881807-9288opendoar:2020-12-22T21:32:02Texto digital - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The canon or the playlist of the webdocumentary O cânone ou a playlist do webdocumentário |
title |
The canon or the playlist of the webdocumentary |
spellingShingle |
The canon or the playlist of the webdocumentary The canon or the playlist of the webdocumentary Penafria, Manuela Penafria, Manuela |
title_short |
The canon or the playlist of the webdocumentary |
title_full |
The canon or the playlist of the webdocumentary |
title_fullStr |
The canon or the playlist of the webdocumentary The canon or the playlist of the webdocumentary |
title_full_unstemmed |
The canon or the playlist of the webdocumentary The canon or the playlist of the webdocumentary |
title_sort |
The canon or the playlist of the webdocumentary |
author |
Penafria, Manuela |
author_facet |
Penafria, Manuela Penafria, Manuela |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Penafria, Manuela |
description |
All art has its own canon. Digital creation is clearly an artistic creation, which includes the webdocumentary. In this sense, it is legitimate to ask whether the webdocumentary has a canon. In order to discuss this issue, I focus on the MIT Open Documentary Lab website, a well-recognized entity in digital creation, where professionals, academics and critics chose webdocumentaries of their preference and presented the reasons for their choices. I begin by noting that the term “canon” is absent, playlist is the term used. In the first part of the text, after a brief discussion about “canon” and playlist, data about the playlists are presented and I create a super playlist, that is, a list of the most voted webdocumentaries. Then, I read the comments in order to understand what qualities are highlighted there. This reading intends to contribute to a knowledge of the webdocumentary as an activity of artistic creation, as well as the qualities of specific works that were highlighted by the critical eye of specialists. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/77564 10.5007/1807-9288.2020v16n2p298 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/77564 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1807-9288.2020v16n2p298 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/77564/45073 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Manuela Penafria http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Manuela Penafria http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Center for Research in Computing, Literature, and Linguistics (NuPILL) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Center for Research in Computing, Literature, and Linguistics (NuPILL) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Texto Digital; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): Imagens e imaginários na era digital/virtual; 298-308 Texto Digital; Vol. 16 No 2 (2020): Imagens e imaginários na era digital/virtual; 298-308 Texto Digital; v. 16 n. 2 (2020): Imagens e imaginários na era digital/virtual; 298-308 1807-9288 reponame:Texto digital instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Texto digital |
collection |
Texto digital |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Texto digital - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
textodigital@cce.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1822179538554060800 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5007/1807-9288.2020v16n2p298 |