The reasons why Wanda Tinasky not be Thomas Pynchon: a case study (I)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brandão, Saulo Cunha de Serpa
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Texto digital
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/1807-9288.2018v14n2p144
Resumo: This paper reports a practical experience in which I use some Neolo software function to analyze three groups of texts: 1. Non-fictional writings by Thomas Pynchon; 2. The letters of Wanda Tinasky; and, 3. the Letters that were published in reaction to Wanda's ideas in the same newspaper. The goal is to show that it is possible to prove that Pynchon did not write Wanda's letters as some specialists in the work of the fictionist believed. Professor Donald Foster has already proven this by following a traditional, historical investigation. In this paper, I will demonstrate how the distinction can be made from computational analysis and attends to quantitative, qualitative methods and allied to some historical data to strengthen the proposal. A final goal I aim at with this work is to demonstrate that it takes no bold and complex formulas to do the job of distinguishing authors' style.
id UFSC-27_f72faa4b9f022e81d8d685cbf23243b6
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/59792
network_acronym_str UFSC-27
network_name_str Texto digital
repository_id_str
spelling The reasons why Wanda Tinasky not be Thomas Pynchon: a case study (I)Os porquês de Wanda Tinasky não ser Thomas Pynchon – um estudo de caso (I)This paper reports a practical experience in which I use some Neolo software function to analyze three groups of texts: 1. Non-fictional writings by Thomas Pynchon; 2. The letters of Wanda Tinasky; and, 3. the Letters that were published in reaction to Wanda's ideas in the same newspaper. The goal is to show that it is possible to prove that Pynchon did not write Wanda's letters as some specialists in the work of the fictionist believed. Professor Donald Foster has already proven this by following a traditional, historical investigation. In this paper, I will demonstrate how the distinction can be made from computational analysis and attends to quantitative, qualitative methods and allied to some historical data to strengthen the proposal. A final goal I aim at with this work is to demonstrate that it takes no bold and complex formulas to do the job of distinguishing authors' style.Este trabalho relata uma experiência prática em que utilizo algumas funcionalidades do software Neolo para analisar três grupos de textos: 1. Escritos não ficcionais de Thomas Pynchon; 2. As cartas de Wanda Tinasky; e, 3. Cartas que foram publicadas em reação às ideias de Wanda no mesmo jornal. O objetivo é mostrar que é possível comprovar que as cartas de Wanda não foram escritas por Pynchon como criam alguns especialistas da obra do ficcionista. O professor Donald Foster já fez essa comprovação seguindo uma investigação tradicional, histórica. Neste texto demonstrarei como a distinção pode ser feita a partir de análise computacional e atende a métodos quantitativo, qualitativos e aliados a algum dado histórico para fortalecer a proposta. Um último objetivo que almejo com este trabalho é demonstrar que não é preciso fórmulas arrojadas e complexas para fazer o trabalho de distinguir estilo de autores.Center for Research in Computing, Literature, and Linguistics (NuPILL)2018-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/1807-9288.2018v14n2p14410.5007/1807-9288.2018v14n2p144Texto Digital; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2018); 144-155Texto Digital; Vol. 14 No 2 (2018); 144-155Texto Digital; v. 14 n. 2 (2018); 144-1551807-9288reponame:Texto digitalinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/1807-9288.2018v14n2p144/38184Copyright (c) 2018 Saulo Cunha de Serpa Brandãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrandão, Saulo Cunha de Serpa2019-01-18T10:41:08Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/59792Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigitalPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/oaitextodigital@cce.ufsc.br1807-92881807-9288opendoar:2019-01-18T10:41:08Texto digital - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The reasons why Wanda Tinasky not be Thomas Pynchon: a case study (I)
Os porquês de Wanda Tinasky não ser Thomas Pynchon – um estudo de caso (I)
title The reasons why Wanda Tinasky not be Thomas Pynchon: a case study (I)
spellingShingle The reasons why Wanda Tinasky not be Thomas Pynchon: a case study (I)
Brandão, Saulo Cunha de Serpa
title_short The reasons why Wanda Tinasky not be Thomas Pynchon: a case study (I)
title_full The reasons why Wanda Tinasky not be Thomas Pynchon: a case study (I)
title_fullStr The reasons why Wanda Tinasky not be Thomas Pynchon: a case study (I)
title_full_unstemmed The reasons why Wanda Tinasky not be Thomas Pynchon: a case study (I)
title_sort The reasons why Wanda Tinasky not be Thomas Pynchon: a case study (I)
author Brandão, Saulo Cunha de Serpa
author_facet Brandão, Saulo Cunha de Serpa
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brandão, Saulo Cunha de Serpa
description This paper reports a practical experience in which I use some Neolo software function to analyze three groups of texts: 1. Non-fictional writings by Thomas Pynchon; 2. The letters of Wanda Tinasky; and, 3. the Letters that were published in reaction to Wanda's ideas in the same newspaper. The goal is to show that it is possible to prove that Pynchon did not write Wanda's letters as some specialists in the work of the fictionist believed. Professor Donald Foster has already proven this by following a traditional, historical investigation. In this paper, I will demonstrate how the distinction can be made from computational analysis and attends to quantitative, qualitative methods and allied to some historical data to strengthen the proposal. A final goal I aim at with this work is to demonstrate that it takes no bold and complex formulas to do the job of distinguishing authors' style.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/1807-9288.2018v14n2p144
10.5007/1807-9288.2018v14n2p144
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/1807-9288.2018v14n2p144
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1807-9288.2018v14n2p144
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/textodigital/article/view/1807-9288.2018v14n2p144/38184
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Saulo Cunha de Serpa Brandão
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Saulo Cunha de Serpa Brandão
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Center for Research in Computing, Literature, and Linguistics (NuPILL)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Center for Research in Computing, Literature, and Linguistics (NuPILL)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Texto Digital; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2018); 144-155
Texto Digital; Vol. 14 No 2 (2018); 144-155
Texto Digital; v. 14 n. 2 (2018); 144-155
1807-9288
reponame:Texto digital
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Texto digital
collection Texto digital
repository.name.fl_str_mv Texto digital - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv textodigital@cce.ufsc.br
_version_ 1797174794625482752