Brazilian scientific production about Plagiarism: characterization and range from Scopus basis.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Encontros Bibli |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/1518-2924.2020.e70258 |
Resumo: | Objective: To analyze the production and scientific scope on the theme plagiarism in the Scopus basis. Identify the most productive themes, co-authors, institutions, journals and authors. Show the scientific reach of production through the characteristics of its citing.Methods: The research is bibliometric exploratory. It proposes to broaden the understanding of the Brazilian context about this scientific production.Results: The results highlight that plagiarism, scientific and ethical misconduct are the most mentioned keywords. Co-authoring was conducted with Spain, the United Kingdom, the United States, France and India. The most productive institutions are represented by the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) and the University of São Paulo (USP). As for the most productive journals, the highlight is the “Revista Brasileira de Educação”. Among the most productive authors is the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), represented by Vasconcelos, S.M.R. The highlight citings come from the United States and Brazil, especially the USP and UFRJ institutions. The prominent citing journal is Dutch-based Scientometrics. Referring to the authors who made the most citations are Amancio, D.R. (USP) and Vasconcelos, S.M.R. (UFRJ).Conclusions: The results achieved allowed us to broaden our understanding of the Brazilian productive context regarding plagiarism. Brazil is able to lead the Latin American actions on the plagiarism issue in scientific production. Therefore, the guarantees of communicated knowledge depend on an understanding of science theory and intellectual honesty in the use of research methods. |
id |
UFSC-29_e676cadbab6d7e7ccac71b820a7ea124 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/70258 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-29 |
network_name_str |
Encontros Bibli |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Brazilian scientific production about Plagiarism: characterization and range from Scopus basis.Produção científica brasileira sobre plágio: caracterização e alcance a partir da base SCOPUSPlágio Produção científica BibliometriaCoautoriasCitaçõesPlagiarism Scientific production Bibliometry Co-authoringCitationsObjective: To analyze the production and scientific scope on the theme plagiarism in the Scopus basis. Identify the most productive themes, co-authors, institutions, journals and authors. Show the scientific reach of production through the characteristics of its citing.Methods: The research is bibliometric exploratory. It proposes to broaden the understanding of the Brazilian context about this scientific production.Results: The results highlight that plagiarism, scientific and ethical misconduct are the most mentioned keywords. Co-authoring was conducted with Spain, the United Kingdom, the United States, France and India. The most productive institutions are represented by the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) and the University of São Paulo (USP). As for the most productive journals, the highlight is the “Revista Brasileira de Educação”. Among the most productive authors is the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), represented by Vasconcelos, S.M.R. The highlight citings come from the United States and Brazil, especially the USP and UFRJ institutions. The prominent citing journal is Dutch-based Scientometrics. Referring to the authors who made the most citations are Amancio, D.R. (USP) and Vasconcelos, S.M.R. (UFRJ).Conclusions: The results achieved allowed us to broaden our understanding of the Brazilian productive context regarding plagiarism. Brazil is able to lead the Latin American actions on the plagiarism issue in scientific production. Therefore, the guarantees of communicated knowledge depend on an understanding of science theory and intellectual honesty in the use of research methods.Objetivo: Analisar a produção e alcance científico sobre o tema plágio na base Scopus. Identificar temáticas, coautorias, instituições, periódicos e autores mais produtivos. Evidenciar o alcance científico da produção por meio das características de seus citantes.Método: A pesquisa foi conduzida sob um viés bibliométrico exploratório, na medida em que se propõe a ampliar a compreensão do contexto brasileiro sobre a referida produção científica.Resultado: Os resultados destacam que plágio, má conduta científica e ética são as palavras-chave mais mencionadas. As coautorias foram realizadas com Espanha, Reino Unido, Estados Unidos, França e Índia. As instituições mais produtivas são representadas pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) e Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Quanto aos periódicos mais produtivos, destaque para a “Revista Brasileira de Educação”. Dentre os autores mais produtivos, está a Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), representada por Vasconcelos, S.M.R. Os principais citantes são provenientes dos Estados Unidos e Brasil, com destaque para as instituições USP e UFRJ. O periódico citante destacado é o “Scientometrics”, de origem holandesa. Referente aos autores que realizaram mais citações tem-se Amancio, D.R. (USP) e Vasconcelos, S.M.R. (UFRJ).Conclusões: Os resultados alcançados possibilitaram ampliar a compreensão sobre o contexto produtivo brasileiro referente ao plágio. O Brasil tem condições de liderar as ações no âmbito latino-americano sobre a questão plágio na produção científica. Portanto, as garantias do conhecimento comunicado dependem da compreensão da teoria da ciência e da honestidade intelectual no uso dos métodos de pesquisa.Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC2020-07-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/1518-2924.2020.e7025810.5007/1518-2924.2020.e70258Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; Vol. 25 (2020): SEM CIÊNCIA NÃO HÁ FUTURO; 01-26Encontros Bibli: revista electrónica de bibliotecología y ciencias de la información.; Vol. 25 (2020): SEM CIÊNCIA NÃO HÁ FUTURO; 01-26Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; v. 25 (2020): SEM CIÊNCIA NÃO HÁ FUTURO; 01-261518-2924reponame:Encontros Bibliinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/1518-2924.2020.e70258/43762https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/1518-2924.2020.e70258/53768https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/1518-2924.2020.e70258/43763Copyright (c) 2020 Fabio Orsi Meschini, Marivalde Moacir Francelinhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMeschini, Fabio OrsiFrancelin, Marivalde Moacir2023-07-18T01:48:07Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/70258Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/oaiencontrosbibli@contato.ufsc.br||portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1518-29241518-2924opendoar:2023-07-18T01:48:07Encontros Bibli - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian scientific production about Plagiarism: characterization and range from Scopus basis. Produção científica brasileira sobre plágio: caracterização e alcance a partir da base SCOPUS |
title |
Brazilian scientific production about Plagiarism: characterization and range from Scopus basis. |
spellingShingle |
Brazilian scientific production about Plagiarism: characterization and range from Scopus basis. Meschini, Fabio Orsi Plágio Produção científica Bibliometria Coautorias Citações Plagiarism Scientific production Bibliometry Co-authoring Citations |
title_short |
Brazilian scientific production about Plagiarism: characterization and range from Scopus basis. |
title_full |
Brazilian scientific production about Plagiarism: characterization and range from Scopus basis. |
title_fullStr |
Brazilian scientific production about Plagiarism: characterization and range from Scopus basis. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Brazilian scientific production about Plagiarism: characterization and range from Scopus basis. |
title_sort |
Brazilian scientific production about Plagiarism: characterization and range from Scopus basis. |
author |
Meschini, Fabio Orsi |
author_facet |
Meschini, Fabio Orsi Francelin, Marivalde Moacir |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Francelin, Marivalde Moacir |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Meschini, Fabio Orsi Francelin, Marivalde Moacir |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Plágio Produção científica Bibliometria Coautorias Citações Plagiarism Scientific production Bibliometry Co-authoring Citations |
topic |
Plágio Produção científica Bibliometria Coautorias Citações Plagiarism Scientific production Bibliometry Co-authoring Citations |
description |
Objective: To analyze the production and scientific scope on the theme plagiarism in the Scopus basis. Identify the most productive themes, co-authors, institutions, journals and authors. Show the scientific reach of production through the characteristics of its citing.Methods: The research is bibliometric exploratory. It proposes to broaden the understanding of the Brazilian context about this scientific production.Results: The results highlight that plagiarism, scientific and ethical misconduct are the most mentioned keywords. Co-authoring was conducted with Spain, the United Kingdom, the United States, France and India. The most productive institutions are represented by the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) and the University of São Paulo (USP). As for the most productive journals, the highlight is the “Revista Brasileira de Educação”. Among the most productive authors is the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), represented by Vasconcelos, S.M.R. The highlight citings come from the United States and Brazil, especially the USP and UFRJ institutions. The prominent citing journal is Dutch-based Scientometrics. Referring to the authors who made the most citations are Amancio, D.R. (USP) and Vasconcelos, S.M.R. (UFRJ).Conclusions: The results achieved allowed us to broaden our understanding of the Brazilian productive context regarding plagiarism. Brazil is able to lead the Latin American actions on the plagiarism issue in scientific production. Therefore, the guarantees of communicated knowledge depend on an understanding of science theory and intellectual honesty in the use of research methods. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/1518-2924.2020.e70258 10.5007/1518-2924.2020.e70258 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/1518-2924.2020.e70258 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1518-2924.2020.e70258 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/1518-2924.2020.e70258/43762 https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/1518-2924.2020.e70258/53768 https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/1518-2924.2020.e70258/43763 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Fabio Orsi Meschini, Marivalde Moacir Francelin https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Fabio Orsi Meschini, Marivalde Moacir Francelin https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; Vol. 25 (2020): SEM CIÊNCIA NÃO HÁ FUTURO; 01-26 Encontros Bibli: revista electrónica de bibliotecología y ciencias de la información.; Vol. 25 (2020): SEM CIÊNCIA NÃO HÁ FUTURO; 01-26 Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; v. 25 (2020): SEM CIÊNCIA NÃO HÁ FUTURO; 01-26 1518-2924 reponame:Encontros Bibli instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Encontros Bibli |
collection |
Encontros Bibli |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Encontros Bibli - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
encontrosbibli@contato.ufsc.br||portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1797067778449997824 |