Copyright, plagiarism and co-authorship: academic and ethical

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Satur, Roberto Vilmar
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Dias, Guilherme Ataide, Silva, Armando Manuel Barreiros Malheiro da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Information Science
Texto Completo: https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8889
Resumo: Copyright, plagiarism and co-authorship are themes that arouse controversy in the academic world, especially under ethical and legal parameters.  The general objective of this research is to understand, from the perspective of copyright, non-plagiarism and co-authorship, how the use of information and its belonging to others can be made without having an unethical or anti-legal attitude, as well as demystifying self plagiarism. To that end, the research question was: “From the perspective of copyright, non-plagiarism and co-authorship, how can the use of information of his or her own and of others be used without having an unethical or anti-legal attitude?” The methodology used was bibliographic and reflection research, using qualitative arguments. As result, there is an important debate involving two problematic sides of the “same coin”. On one side, are those who produce more works, with their researches and writings, the publishers, periodicals, courses and regulatory agencies; And on the other side are those who are asked (required) to produce in quantity and quality and do not fit well to this requirement, for not having that profile, and that often resort to “sellers of academic works”, by copying parts or the work of others or repeating their work already done as something new. It is known that to meet the academic demands of production, many people use unethical subterfuges to achieve their goals, and others take advantage, creating a lucrative business. The regulatory and supervisory bodies attempt to act and inhibit such practice, such as the creation of the Copyright Law, plagiarism detection software and others. However, this practice is far from being completely eliminated. This article will discuss the unfolding of issues of copyright, plagiarism and co-authorship, instigating the academy itself to reflect not only on the students’ attitudes, but also on teachers and researchers. We conclude that not everything that seems to be a crime is so and it is necessary to review practices and requirements that try to make the researcher a producer in series of publications without relativizing the condemnation of the unethical practice of false authorship
id UNESP-31_974843ea9913d3b24113e5bb72521c7d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/8889
network_acronym_str UNESP-31
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Information Science
repository_id_str
spelling Copyright, plagiarism and co-authorship: academic and ethicalDireito autoral, plágio e coautoria: questões acadêmicas e éticasPlágioDireito AutoralCoautoriaÉticaAutoplágioPlagiarismCopyrightCo-authorshipEthicsSelf-PlagiarismCopyright, plagiarism and co-authorship are themes that arouse controversy in the academic world, especially under ethical and legal parameters.  The general objective of this research is to understand, from the perspective of copyright, non-plagiarism and co-authorship, how the use of information and its belonging to others can be made without having an unethical or anti-legal attitude, as well as demystifying self plagiarism. To that end, the research question was: “From the perspective of copyright, non-plagiarism and co-authorship, how can the use of information of his or her own and of others be used without having an unethical or anti-legal attitude?” The methodology used was bibliographic and reflection research, using qualitative arguments. As result, there is an important debate involving two problematic sides of the “same coin”. On one side, are those who produce more works, with their researches and writings, the publishers, periodicals, courses and regulatory agencies; And on the other side are those who are asked (required) to produce in quantity and quality and do not fit well to this requirement, for not having that profile, and that often resort to “sellers of academic works”, by copying parts or the work of others or repeating their work already done as something new. It is known that to meet the academic demands of production, many people use unethical subterfuges to achieve their goals, and others take advantage, creating a lucrative business. The regulatory and supervisory bodies attempt to act and inhibit such practice, such as the creation of the Copyright Law, plagiarism detection software and others. However, this practice is far from being completely eliminated. This article will discuss the unfolding of issues of copyright, plagiarism and co-authorship, instigating the academy itself to reflect not only on the students’ attitudes, but also on teachers and researchers. We conclude that not everything that seems to be a crime is so and it is necessary to review practices and requirements that try to make the researcher a producer in series of publications without relativizing the condemnation of the unethical practice of false authorshipDireito autoral, plágio e coautoria são temas que despertam controvérsia no meio acadêmico, especialmente sob parâmetros éticos e legais. O objetivo geral deste artigo é entender, na perspectiva do direito autoral, do não plágio e da coautoria, como pode ser feito o uso de informações e seu pertencimento, de outrem, sem ter atitude antiética ou antijurídica, bem como, desmistificar o autoplágio. Para tal, a questão de pesquisa foi: “Sob a perspectiva do direito autoral, do não plágio e da coautoria, como pode ser feito o uso de informações suas ou de outrem e seu pertencimento, sem ter atitude antiética ou antijurídica?” A metodologia utilizada basicamente é a pesquisa bibliográfica e de reflexão, utilizando argumentos qualitativos. Como resultado tem-se um importante debate que envolve dois lados problemáticos de uma “mesma moeda”. De um lado estão os que mais produzem obras, com suas pesquisas e escritas, as editoras, os periódicos, os cursos e os órgãos reguladores; e do outro lado estão os que são solicitados (obrigados) a produzir em quantidade e qualidade e não se adéquam bem a essa exigência, assim acabam recorrendo aos “vendedores de trabalhos acadêmicos”, copiando partes ou integralmente o trabalho de outros ou repetindo seu trabalho já feito como algo novo. Sabe-se que para atender as exigências acadêmicas de produção, muitos usam de subterfúgios não éticos para conseguirem seus objetivos, outros se aproveitam fazendo disso um negócio. Os órgãos de regulação e fiscalização tentam atuar e inibir tal prática como é o caso da criação da Lei dos Direitos Autorais, dos produtos de software de detecção de plágio e outros. No entanto, essa prática está longe de ser eliminada. Esse artigo discutirá os vários desdobramentos que tem a questão do direito autoral, do plágio e da coautoria, instigando para uma reflexão da própria academia, não apenas sobre as atitudes dos alunos, mas também dos professores e dos pesquisadores. Concluímos que nem tudo que parece ser crime assim o é, e que é preciso rever as práticas e as exigências que tentam fazer do pesquisador um produtor em série de publicações, sem relativizar a condenação da prática antiética da falsa autoria.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2020-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/888910.36311/1981-1640.2020.v14n1.04.p57Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 14 No. 1 - jan-mar (2020); 57-87Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 - jan-mar (2020); 57-87Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends; v. 14 n. 1 - jan-mar (2020); 57-871981-1640reponame:Brazilian Journal of Information Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8889/6283Satur, Roberto VilmarDias, Guilherme AtaideSilva, Armando Manuel Barreiros Malheiro dainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-01-04T19:39:57Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/8889Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/indexPUBhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/oaibrajis.marilia@unesp.br||1981-16401981-1640opendoar:2022-01-04T19:39:57Brazilian Journal of Information Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Copyright, plagiarism and co-authorship: academic and ethical
Direito autoral, plágio e coautoria: questões acadêmicas e éticas
title Copyright, plagiarism and co-authorship: academic and ethical
spellingShingle Copyright, plagiarism and co-authorship: academic and ethical
Satur, Roberto Vilmar
Plágio
Direito Autoral
Coautoria
Ética
Autoplágio
Plagiarism
Copyright
Co-authorship
Ethics
Self-Plagiarism
title_short Copyright, plagiarism and co-authorship: academic and ethical
title_full Copyright, plagiarism and co-authorship: academic and ethical
title_fullStr Copyright, plagiarism and co-authorship: academic and ethical
title_full_unstemmed Copyright, plagiarism and co-authorship: academic and ethical
title_sort Copyright, plagiarism and co-authorship: academic and ethical
author Satur, Roberto Vilmar
author_facet Satur, Roberto Vilmar
Dias, Guilherme Ataide
Silva, Armando Manuel Barreiros Malheiro da
author_role author
author2 Dias, Guilherme Ataide
Silva, Armando Manuel Barreiros Malheiro da
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Satur, Roberto Vilmar
Dias, Guilherme Ataide
Silva, Armando Manuel Barreiros Malheiro da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Plágio
Direito Autoral
Coautoria
Ética
Autoplágio
Plagiarism
Copyright
Co-authorship
Ethics
Self-Plagiarism
topic Plágio
Direito Autoral
Coautoria
Ética
Autoplágio
Plagiarism
Copyright
Co-authorship
Ethics
Self-Plagiarism
description Copyright, plagiarism and co-authorship are themes that arouse controversy in the academic world, especially under ethical and legal parameters.  The general objective of this research is to understand, from the perspective of copyright, non-plagiarism and co-authorship, how the use of information and its belonging to others can be made without having an unethical or anti-legal attitude, as well as demystifying self plagiarism. To that end, the research question was: “From the perspective of copyright, non-plagiarism and co-authorship, how can the use of information of his or her own and of others be used without having an unethical or anti-legal attitude?” The methodology used was bibliographic and reflection research, using qualitative arguments. As result, there is an important debate involving two problematic sides of the “same coin”. On one side, are those who produce more works, with their researches and writings, the publishers, periodicals, courses and regulatory agencies; And on the other side are those who are asked (required) to produce in quantity and quality and do not fit well to this requirement, for not having that profile, and that often resort to “sellers of academic works”, by copying parts or the work of others or repeating their work already done as something new. It is known that to meet the academic demands of production, many people use unethical subterfuges to achieve their goals, and others take advantage, creating a lucrative business. The regulatory and supervisory bodies attempt to act and inhibit such practice, such as the creation of the Copyright Law, plagiarism detection software and others. However, this practice is far from being completely eliminated. This article will discuss the unfolding of issues of copyright, plagiarism and co-authorship, instigating the academy itself to reflect not only on the students’ attitudes, but also on teachers and researchers. We conclude that not everything that seems to be a crime is so and it is necessary to review practices and requirements that try to make the researcher a producer in series of publications without relativizing the condemnation of the unethical practice of false authorship
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8889
10.36311/1981-1640.2020.v14n1.04.p57
url https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8889
identifier_str_mv 10.36311/1981-1640.2020.v14n1.04.p57
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/8889/6283
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 14 No. 1 - jan-mar (2020); 57-87
Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 - jan-mar (2020); 57-87
Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends; v. 14 n. 1 - jan-mar (2020); 57-87
1981-1640
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Information Science
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Information Science
collection Brazilian Journal of Information Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Information Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brajis.marilia@unesp.br||
_version_ 1797069098814799872