Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Correia, Mesaque Silva
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Carvalho, Joanna Hariel Almeida, Silva, Geovana Torres da, Silva, Italo Marcelo Pedro Amorim e
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e73577
Resumo: The present article had the vocation to verify if the homosexuality theme is problematized in Physical Education classes, and what is the work developed by the Physical Education teacher in front of homo-affective students. For this, we appropriated the theoretical and methodological assumptions of qualitative research of the descriptive type. We used the semi-structured interview that was carried out with 10 (ten) Physical Education teachers who develop their teaching activities in state public schools in the city of Teresina - PI. The collected data were submitted to the classical content analysis proposed by Bardin (2011), with the purpose of synthesizing analysis categories. From the analysis of the statements of the interviewees, it was possible to extract four categories of analysis: The invisible homoaffective in Physical Education classes; Homo-affection as a discourse of refusal; The equality that mischaracterizes the homoaffective in the Physical Education classes and the Schools of many and the classes of some few. In schools, we find educators who say (and feel) committed to their professional practice, but are blind to their actions, especially when asked about the pedagogical didactic actions established in the classroom with homo-affective students. Therefore, it is concluded that there is no pedagogical treatment in Physical Education classes for body activities related to the issue of homoaffectiveness, even with all teachers verbalizing being aware of the presence of homoaffective in their classes. On the contrary, what was evident was a discourse of equality that mischaracterizes the homoaffective student during the classes.  
id UFSC-2_244bc24387db052230b8ac2a25dccf9f
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/73577
network_acronym_str UFSC-2
network_name_str Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
repository_id_str
spelling Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroomDónde está el maricón que estaba aquí? Prejuicio y discriminación lo excluyeron de la claseCadê o viado que tava aqui? O preconceito e a discriminação excluíram da quadra de aulaThe present article had the vocation to verify if the homosexuality theme is problematized in Physical Education classes, and what is the work developed by the Physical Education teacher in front of homo-affective students. For this, we appropriated the theoretical and methodological assumptions of qualitative research of the descriptive type. We used the semi-structured interview that was carried out with 10 (ten) Physical Education teachers who develop their teaching activities in state public schools in the city of Teresina - PI. The collected data were submitted to the classical content analysis proposed by Bardin (2011), with the purpose of synthesizing analysis categories. From the analysis of the statements of the interviewees, it was possible to extract four categories of analysis: The invisible homoaffective in Physical Education classes; Homo-affection as a discourse of refusal; The equality that mischaracterizes the homoaffective in the Physical Education classes and the Schools of many and the classes of some few. In schools, we find educators who say (and feel) committed to their professional practice, but are blind to their actions, especially when asked about the pedagogical didactic actions established in the classroom with homo-affective students. Therefore, it is concluded that there is no pedagogical treatment in Physical Education classes for body activities related to the issue of homoaffectiveness, even with all teachers verbalizing being aware of the presence of homoaffective in their classes. On the contrary, what was evident was a discourse of equality that mischaracterizes the homoaffective student during the classes.  El presente artículo tenía la vocación de verificar si el tema de la homosexualidad se problematiza en las clases de Educación Física y cuál es el trabajo desarrollado por el maestro de Educación Física frente a los estudiantes homo-afectivos. Para eso, nos apropiamos de los supuestos teóricos y metodológicos de la investigación cualitativa del tipo descriptivo. Utilizamos la entrevista semiestructurada, que se realizó con 10 (diez) maestros de Educación Física, que desarrollan sus actividades de enseñanza en las escuelas públicas estatales de la ciudad de Teresina - PI. Los datos recopilados se sometieron al análisis de contenido temático propuesto por Bardin, con el fin de sintetizar categorías de análisis. A partir del análisis de las declaraciones de los entrevistados, fue posible extraer cuatro categorías de análisis: el homoafectivo invisible en las clases de educación física; El afecto como discurso de rechazo; Igualdad que caracteriza erróneamente la eficacia de las clases de educación física y las escuelas de muchos y las clases de unos pocos. En las escuelas, encontramos educadores que dicen (y se sienten) comprometidos con su práctica profesional, pero que son ciegos a sus acciones, especialmente cuando se les pregunta sobre las acciones didácticas pedagógicas establecidas en el aula con estudiantes homo-afectivos. Por lo tanto, se concluye que no existe un tratamiento pedagógico en las clases de Educación Física para las actividades corporales relacionadas con el tema de la homosexualidad, incluso cuando todos los maestros verbalizan estar conscientes de la presencia de homoafectivos en sus clases. Por el contrario, lo que era evidente era un discurso de igualdad que caracteriza erróneamente al estudiante efectivo durante las clases.O presente artigo teve como vocação verificar se o tema homossexualidade é problematizado nas aulas de Educação Física, e qual o trabalho desenvolvido pelo professor de Educação Física frente aos alunos homoafetivos. Para tanto, nos apropriamos dos pressupostos teóricos e metodológicos da pesquisa qualitativa do tipo descritiva.Utilizamos a entrevista semiestruturada que foi realizada com 10 (dez) professores de Ed. Física que desenvolvem suas atividades docentes em escolas públicas estaduais da cidade de Teresina – PI. Os dados coletados foram submetidos à análise clássica de conteúdos proposta por Bardin (2011), com a finalidade de sintetização de categorias de análises. Da análise das falas dos depoentes, foi possível extrair quatro categorias de análise: O homoafetivo invisível nas aulas de Educação Física; A homoafetividade como discurso da recusa; A igualdade que descaracteriza o homoafetivo nas aulas de Educação Física e As escolas de muitos e as aulas de algunspoucos. Encontramos, nas escolas, educadores que se dizem (e se sentem) compromissados com o seu fazer profissional, mas mostram-se cegos para as suas ações, principalmente quando questionados sobre as ações didáticas pedagógicas estabelecidas na quadra de aula junto aos alunos homoafetivos. Portanto, conclui-se a não existência de tratos pedagógicos nas aulas de Ed. Física para as atividades corporais referentes à questão da homoafetividade, mesmo com todos os professores verbalizarem ser cientes da presença do homoafetivo em suas aulas. Ao contrário, o que ficou evidente foi um discurso da igualdade que descaracteriza o aluno homoafetivo no decorrer das aulas.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2020-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e7357710.5007/2175-8042.2020e73577Motrivivência; v. 32 n. 63 (2020); 01-202175-80420103-4111reponame:Motrivivência (Florianópolis)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e73577/44042Copyright (c) 2020 Motrivivênciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCorreia, Mesaque SilvaCarvalho, Joanna Hariel AlmeidaSilva, Geovana Torres daSilva, Italo Marcelo Pedro Amorim e2020-10-02T21:01:15Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/73577Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/oai||giovani.pires@ufsc.br2175-80420103-4111opendoar:2020-10-02T21:01:15Motrivivência (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom
Dónde está el maricón que estaba aquí? Prejuicio y discriminación lo excluyeron de la clase
Cadê o viado que tava aqui? O preconceito e a discriminação excluíram da quadra de aula
title Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom
spellingShingle Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom
Correia, Mesaque Silva
title_short Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom
title_full Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom
title_fullStr Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom
title_full_unstemmed Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom
title_sort Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom
author Correia, Mesaque Silva
author_facet Correia, Mesaque Silva
Carvalho, Joanna Hariel Almeida
Silva, Geovana Torres da
Silva, Italo Marcelo Pedro Amorim e
author_role author
author2 Carvalho, Joanna Hariel Almeida
Silva, Geovana Torres da
Silva, Italo Marcelo Pedro Amorim e
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Correia, Mesaque Silva
Carvalho, Joanna Hariel Almeida
Silva, Geovana Torres da
Silva, Italo Marcelo Pedro Amorim e
description The present article had the vocation to verify if the homosexuality theme is problematized in Physical Education classes, and what is the work developed by the Physical Education teacher in front of homo-affective students. For this, we appropriated the theoretical and methodological assumptions of qualitative research of the descriptive type. We used the semi-structured interview that was carried out with 10 (ten) Physical Education teachers who develop their teaching activities in state public schools in the city of Teresina - PI. The collected data were submitted to the classical content analysis proposed by Bardin (2011), with the purpose of synthesizing analysis categories. From the analysis of the statements of the interviewees, it was possible to extract four categories of analysis: The invisible homoaffective in Physical Education classes; Homo-affection as a discourse of refusal; The equality that mischaracterizes the homoaffective in the Physical Education classes and the Schools of many and the classes of some few. In schools, we find educators who say (and feel) committed to their professional practice, but are blind to their actions, especially when asked about the pedagogical didactic actions established in the classroom with homo-affective students. Therefore, it is concluded that there is no pedagogical treatment in Physical Education classes for body activities related to the issue of homoaffectiveness, even with all teachers verbalizing being aware of the presence of homoaffective in their classes. On the contrary, what was evident was a discourse of equality that mischaracterizes the homoaffective student during the classes.  
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e73577
10.5007/2175-8042.2020e73577
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e73577
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-8042.2020e73577
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e73577/44042
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Motrivivência
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Motrivivência
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Motrivivência; v. 32 n. 63 (2020); 01-20
2175-8042
0103-4111
reponame:Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
collection Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Motrivivência (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||giovani.pires@ufsc.br
_version_ 1789434865839505408