Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Motrivivência (Florianópolis) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e73577 |
Resumo: | The present article had the vocation to verify if the homosexuality theme is problematized in Physical Education classes, and what is the work developed by the Physical Education teacher in front of homo-affective students. For this, we appropriated the theoretical and methodological assumptions of qualitative research of the descriptive type. We used the semi-structured interview that was carried out with 10 (ten) Physical Education teachers who develop their teaching activities in state public schools in the city of Teresina - PI. The collected data were submitted to the classical content analysis proposed by Bardin (2011), with the purpose of synthesizing analysis categories. From the analysis of the statements of the interviewees, it was possible to extract four categories of analysis: The invisible homoaffective in Physical Education classes; Homo-affection as a discourse of refusal; The equality that mischaracterizes the homoaffective in the Physical Education classes and the Schools of many and the classes of some few. In schools, we find educators who say (and feel) committed to their professional practice, but are blind to their actions, especially when asked about the pedagogical didactic actions established in the classroom with homo-affective students. Therefore, it is concluded that there is no pedagogical treatment in Physical Education classes for body activities related to the issue of homoaffectiveness, even with all teachers verbalizing being aware of the presence of homoaffective in their classes. On the contrary, what was evident was a discourse of equality that mischaracterizes the homoaffective student during the classes. |
id |
UFSC-2_244bc24387db052230b8ac2a25dccf9f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/73577 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-2 |
network_name_str |
Motrivivência (Florianópolis) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroomDónde está el maricón que estaba aquí? Prejuicio y discriminación lo excluyeron de la claseCadê o viado que tava aqui? O preconceito e a discriminação excluíram da quadra de aulaThe present article had the vocation to verify if the homosexuality theme is problematized in Physical Education classes, and what is the work developed by the Physical Education teacher in front of homo-affective students. For this, we appropriated the theoretical and methodological assumptions of qualitative research of the descriptive type. We used the semi-structured interview that was carried out with 10 (ten) Physical Education teachers who develop their teaching activities in state public schools in the city of Teresina - PI. The collected data were submitted to the classical content analysis proposed by Bardin (2011), with the purpose of synthesizing analysis categories. From the analysis of the statements of the interviewees, it was possible to extract four categories of analysis: The invisible homoaffective in Physical Education classes; Homo-affection as a discourse of refusal; The equality that mischaracterizes the homoaffective in the Physical Education classes and the Schools of many and the classes of some few. In schools, we find educators who say (and feel) committed to their professional practice, but are blind to their actions, especially when asked about the pedagogical didactic actions established in the classroom with homo-affective students. Therefore, it is concluded that there is no pedagogical treatment in Physical Education classes for body activities related to the issue of homoaffectiveness, even with all teachers verbalizing being aware of the presence of homoaffective in their classes. On the contrary, what was evident was a discourse of equality that mischaracterizes the homoaffective student during the classes. El presente artículo tenía la vocación de verificar si el tema de la homosexualidad se problematiza en las clases de Educación Física y cuál es el trabajo desarrollado por el maestro de Educación Física frente a los estudiantes homo-afectivos. Para eso, nos apropiamos de los supuestos teóricos y metodológicos de la investigación cualitativa del tipo descriptivo. Utilizamos la entrevista semiestructurada, que se realizó con 10 (diez) maestros de Educación Física, que desarrollan sus actividades de enseñanza en las escuelas públicas estatales de la ciudad de Teresina - PI. Los datos recopilados se sometieron al análisis de contenido temático propuesto por Bardin, con el fin de sintetizar categorías de análisis. A partir del análisis de las declaraciones de los entrevistados, fue posible extraer cuatro categorías de análisis: el homoafectivo invisible en las clases de educación física; El afecto como discurso de rechazo; Igualdad que caracteriza erróneamente la eficacia de las clases de educación física y las escuelas de muchos y las clases de unos pocos. En las escuelas, encontramos educadores que dicen (y se sienten) comprometidos con su práctica profesional, pero que son ciegos a sus acciones, especialmente cuando se les pregunta sobre las acciones didácticas pedagógicas establecidas en el aula con estudiantes homo-afectivos. Por lo tanto, se concluye que no existe un tratamiento pedagógico en las clases de Educación Física para las actividades corporales relacionadas con el tema de la homosexualidad, incluso cuando todos los maestros verbalizan estar conscientes de la presencia de homoafectivos en sus clases. Por el contrario, lo que era evidente era un discurso de igualdad que caracteriza erróneamente al estudiante efectivo durante las clases.O presente artigo teve como vocação verificar se o tema homossexualidade é problematizado nas aulas de Educação Física, e qual o trabalho desenvolvido pelo professor de Educação Física frente aos alunos homoafetivos. Para tanto, nos apropriamos dos pressupostos teóricos e metodológicos da pesquisa qualitativa do tipo descritiva.Utilizamos a entrevista semiestruturada que foi realizada com 10 (dez) professores de Ed. Física que desenvolvem suas atividades docentes em escolas públicas estaduais da cidade de Teresina – PI. Os dados coletados foram submetidos à análise clássica de conteúdos proposta por Bardin (2011), com a finalidade de sintetização de categorias de análises. Da análise das falas dos depoentes, foi possível extrair quatro categorias de análise: O homoafetivo invisível nas aulas de Educação Física; A homoafetividade como discurso da recusa; A igualdade que descaracteriza o homoafetivo nas aulas de Educação Física e As escolas de muitos e as aulas de algunspoucos. Encontramos, nas escolas, educadores que se dizem (e se sentem) compromissados com o seu fazer profissional, mas mostram-se cegos para as suas ações, principalmente quando questionados sobre as ações didáticas pedagógicas estabelecidas na quadra de aula junto aos alunos homoafetivos. Portanto, conclui-se a não existência de tratos pedagógicos nas aulas de Ed. Física para as atividades corporais referentes à questão da homoafetividade, mesmo com todos os professores verbalizarem ser cientes da presença do homoafetivo em suas aulas. Ao contrário, o que ficou evidente foi um discurso da igualdade que descaracteriza o aluno homoafetivo no decorrer das aulas.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2020-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e7357710.5007/2175-8042.2020e73577Motrivivência; v. 32 n. 63 (2020); 01-202175-80420103-4111reponame:Motrivivência (Florianópolis)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e73577/44042Copyright (c) 2020 Motrivivênciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCorreia, Mesaque SilvaCarvalho, Joanna Hariel AlmeidaSilva, Geovana Torres daSilva, Italo Marcelo Pedro Amorim e2020-10-02T21:01:15Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/73577Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/oai||giovani.pires@ufsc.br2175-80420103-4111opendoar:2020-10-02T21:01:15Motrivivência (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom Dónde está el maricón que estaba aquí? Prejuicio y discriminación lo excluyeron de la clase Cadê o viado que tava aqui? O preconceito e a discriminação excluíram da quadra de aula |
title |
Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom |
spellingShingle |
Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom Correia, Mesaque Silva |
title_short |
Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom |
title_full |
Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom |
title_fullStr |
Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom |
title_full_unstemmed |
Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom |
title_sort |
Where's the fag that was here? Prejudice and discrimination excluded from the classroom |
author |
Correia, Mesaque Silva |
author_facet |
Correia, Mesaque Silva Carvalho, Joanna Hariel Almeida Silva, Geovana Torres da Silva, Italo Marcelo Pedro Amorim e |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carvalho, Joanna Hariel Almeida Silva, Geovana Torres da Silva, Italo Marcelo Pedro Amorim e |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Correia, Mesaque Silva Carvalho, Joanna Hariel Almeida Silva, Geovana Torres da Silva, Italo Marcelo Pedro Amorim e |
description |
The present article had the vocation to verify if the homosexuality theme is problematized in Physical Education classes, and what is the work developed by the Physical Education teacher in front of homo-affective students. For this, we appropriated the theoretical and methodological assumptions of qualitative research of the descriptive type. We used the semi-structured interview that was carried out with 10 (ten) Physical Education teachers who develop their teaching activities in state public schools in the city of Teresina - PI. The collected data were submitted to the classical content analysis proposed by Bardin (2011), with the purpose of synthesizing analysis categories. From the analysis of the statements of the interviewees, it was possible to extract four categories of analysis: The invisible homoaffective in Physical Education classes; Homo-affection as a discourse of refusal; The equality that mischaracterizes the homoaffective in the Physical Education classes and the Schools of many and the classes of some few. In schools, we find educators who say (and feel) committed to their professional practice, but are blind to their actions, especially when asked about the pedagogical didactic actions established in the classroom with homo-affective students. Therefore, it is concluded that there is no pedagogical treatment in Physical Education classes for body activities related to the issue of homoaffectiveness, even with all teachers verbalizing being aware of the presence of homoaffective in their classes. On the contrary, what was evident was a discourse of equality that mischaracterizes the homoaffective student during the classes. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e73577 10.5007/2175-8042.2020e73577 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e73577 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-8042.2020e73577 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e73577/44042 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Motrivivência info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Motrivivência |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Motrivivência; v. 32 n. 63 (2020); 01-20 2175-8042 0103-4111 reponame:Motrivivência (Florianópolis) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Motrivivência (Florianópolis) |
collection |
Motrivivência (Florianópolis) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Motrivivência (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||giovani.pires@ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789434865839505408 |