Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Motrivivência (Florianópolis) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e60133 |
Resumo: | The present study aims to systematically review about of physical self-concept (ACF) of people with disabilities (PCD) in adulthood and to identify instruments used to analyze this construct. As methodological procedures of the work, searches were carried out in different databases, covering the entire period of existence of the databases until September 2017. The process followed the PRISMA FlowDiagram recommendations and the articles were classified according to quality criteria adapted from the STROBE instrument. Nine articles reached the final analysis of the study. The results demonstrated six different instruments for analyzing the ACF of adult PCDs, with only two instruments being validated; two articles analyzed the PCA of intellectual PCD, two articles of motor PCD, three articles analyzed different deficiencies and two studies evaluated the ACF of people with and without disabilities. It is concluded that there is a shortage of instruments that assess the ACF of people with disabilities. |
id |
UFSC-2_6626a33aa74b941610020f0ec769b664 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/60133 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-2 |
network_name_str |
Motrivivência (Florianópolis) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic reviewAutoconcepto físico en personas con discapacidad: una revisión sistemáticaAvaliação do autoconceito físico em pessoas com deficiência: uma revisão sistemáticaThe present study aims to systematically review about of physical self-concept (ACF) of people with disabilities (PCD) in adulthood and to identify instruments used to analyze this construct. As methodological procedures of the work, searches were carried out in different databases, covering the entire period of existence of the databases until September 2017. The process followed the PRISMA FlowDiagram recommendations and the articles were classified according to quality criteria adapted from the STROBE instrument. Nine articles reached the final analysis of the study. The results demonstrated six different instruments for analyzing the ACF of adult PCDs, with only two instruments being validated; two articles analyzed the PCA of intellectual PCD, two articles of motor PCD, three articles analyzed different deficiencies and two studies evaluated the ACF of people with and without disabilities. It is concluded that there is a shortage of instruments that assess the ACF of people with disabilities. El presente estudio tiene como objetivo revisar sistemáticamente el autoconcepto físico (ACF) de personas con discapacidad (PCD) en la edad adulta e identificar instrumentos utilizados para el análisis de este constructo. Como procedimientos metodológicos del trabajo se realizaron búsquedas en diferentes bases de datos, comprendiendo todo el período de existencia de las bases hasta septiembre de 2017. El proceso siguió las recomendaciones del PRISMA FlowDiagram y los artículos fueron clasificados conforme criterios de calidad adaptados del instrumento STROBE. Llegaron al análisis final del estudio nueve artículos. Los resultados demostraron seis diferentes instrumentos para analizar el ACF de PCD adultas, siendo sólo dos instrumentos validados. Además, dos artículos analizaron el ACF de PCD intelectual, dos artículos de PCD motoras, tres artículos analizaron diferentes deficiencias y dos estudios evaluaron el ACF de personas con y sin discapacidad. Se concluye que hay escasez de instrumentos que evalúen el ACF de personas con discapacidad.O presente estudo tem como objetivo revisar sistematicamente o estado da arte do autoconceito físico (ACF) de pessoas com deficiência (PCD) adultas e identificar instrumentos para análise deste constructo. Como procedimentos metodológicos, adotaram-se as recomendações do PRISMA FlowDiagram e classificação de artigos conforme critérios de qualidade adaptados do instrumento STROBE. Foram realizadas buscas em diferentes bases de dados, compreendendo todo o período de existência das bases até 2019, chegando à análise final do estudo 11 artigos. Os resultados obtidos através da literatura demonstraram que o grupo deficiência intelectual apresentou α= 0,67-0,82 e o grupo deficiência física α= 0,64-0,85. Ademais, a prática de exercícios físicos apresenta correlação direta com o ACF e, identificaram-se seis instrumentos de avaliação do ACF em PCD, sendo dois validados. Conclui-se que a prática de exercícios físicos tem relação direta com o ACF e há escassez de instrumentos validados que avaliem o ACF de PCD.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2020-04-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e6013310.5007/2175-8042.2020e60133Motrivivência; v. 32 n. 61 (2020); 01-182175-80420103-4111reponame:Motrivivência (Florianópolis)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e60133/42936Copyright (c) 2020 Motrivivênciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVaz Junior, ArnaldoMouad, MarianaGrubertt, Guilherme AlvesSerassuelo Junior, Helio2020-04-22T11:37:55Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/60133Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/oai||giovani.pires@ufsc.br2175-80420103-4111opendoar:2020-04-22T11:37:55Motrivivência (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review Autoconcepto físico en personas con discapacidad: una revisión sistemática Avaliação do autoconceito físico em pessoas com deficiência: uma revisão sistemática |
title |
Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review Vaz Junior, Arnaldo |
title_short |
Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review |
title_full |
Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review |
author |
Vaz Junior, Arnaldo |
author_facet |
Vaz Junior, Arnaldo Mouad, Mariana Grubertt, Guilherme Alves Serassuelo Junior, Helio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mouad, Mariana Grubertt, Guilherme Alves Serassuelo Junior, Helio |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vaz Junior, Arnaldo Mouad, Mariana Grubertt, Guilherme Alves Serassuelo Junior, Helio |
description |
The present study aims to systematically review about of physical self-concept (ACF) of people with disabilities (PCD) in adulthood and to identify instruments used to analyze this construct. As methodological procedures of the work, searches were carried out in different databases, covering the entire period of existence of the databases until September 2017. The process followed the PRISMA FlowDiagram recommendations and the articles were classified according to quality criteria adapted from the STROBE instrument. Nine articles reached the final analysis of the study. The results demonstrated six different instruments for analyzing the ACF of adult PCDs, with only two instruments being validated; two articles analyzed the PCA of intellectual PCD, two articles of motor PCD, three articles analyzed different deficiencies and two studies evaluated the ACF of people with and without disabilities. It is concluded that there is a shortage of instruments that assess the ACF of people with disabilities. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e60133 10.5007/2175-8042.2020e60133 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e60133 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-8042.2020e60133 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e60133/42936 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Motrivivência info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Motrivivência |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Motrivivência; v. 32 n. 61 (2020); 01-18 2175-8042 0103-4111 reponame:Motrivivência (Florianópolis) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Motrivivência (Florianópolis) |
collection |
Motrivivência (Florianópolis) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Motrivivência (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||giovani.pires@ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789434864345284608 |