Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vaz Junior, Arnaldo
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Mouad, Mariana, Grubertt, Guilherme Alves, Serassuelo Junior, Helio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e60133
Resumo: The present study aims to systematically review about of physical self-concept (ACF) of people with disabilities (PCD) in adulthood and to identify instruments used to analyze this construct. As methodological procedures of the work, searches were carried out in different databases, covering the entire period of existence of the databases until September 2017. The process followed the PRISMA FlowDiagram recommendations and the articles were classified according to quality criteria adapted from the STROBE instrument. Nine articles reached the final analysis of the study. The results demonstrated six different instruments for analyzing the ACF of adult PCDs, with only two instruments being validated; two articles analyzed the PCA of intellectual PCD, two articles of motor PCD, three articles analyzed different deficiencies and two studies evaluated the ACF of people with and without disabilities. It is concluded that there is a shortage of instruments that assess the ACF of people with disabilities. 
id UFSC-2_6626a33aa74b941610020f0ec769b664
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/60133
network_acronym_str UFSC-2
network_name_str Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
repository_id_str
spelling Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic reviewAutoconcepto físico en personas con discapacidad: una revisión sistemáticaAvaliação do autoconceito físico em pessoas com deficiência: uma revisão sistemáticaThe present study aims to systematically review about of physical self-concept (ACF) of people with disabilities (PCD) in adulthood and to identify instruments used to analyze this construct. As methodological procedures of the work, searches were carried out in different databases, covering the entire period of existence of the databases until September 2017. The process followed the PRISMA FlowDiagram recommendations and the articles were classified according to quality criteria adapted from the STROBE instrument. Nine articles reached the final analysis of the study. The results demonstrated six different instruments for analyzing the ACF of adult PCDs, with only two instruments being validated; two articles analyzed the PCA of intellectual PCD, two articles of motor PCD, three articles analyzed different deficiencies and two studies evaluated the ACF of people with and without disabilities. It is concluded that there is a shortage of instruments that assess the ACF of people with disabilities. El presente estudio tiene como objetivo revisar sistemáticamente el autoconcepto físico (ACF) de personas con discapacidad (PCD) en la edad adulta e identificar instrumentos utilizados para el análisis de este constructo. Como procedimientos metodológicos del trabajo se realizaron búsquedas en diferentes bases de datos, comprendiendo todo el período de existencia de las bases hasta septiembre de 2017. El proceso siguió las recomendaciones del PRISMA FlowDiagram y los artículos fueron clasificados conforme criterios de calidad adaptados del instrumento STROBE. Llegaron al análisis final del estudio nueve artículos. Los resultados demostraron seis diferentes instrumentos para analizar el ACF de PCD adultas, siendo sólo dos instrumentos validados. Además, dos artículos analizaron el ACF de PCD intelectual, dos artículos de PCD motoras, tres artículos analizaron diferentes deficiencias y dos estudios evaluaron el ACF de personas con y sin discapacidad. Se concluye que hay escasez de instrumentos que evalúen el ACF de personas con discapacidad.O presente estudo tem como objetivo revisar sistematicamente o estado da arte do autoconceito físico (ACF) de pessoas com deficiência (PCD) adultas e identificar instrumentos para análise deste constructo. Como procedimentos metodológicos, adotaram-se as recomendações do PRISMA FlowDiagram e classificação de artigos conforme critérios de qualidade adaptados do instrumento STROBE. Foram realizadas buscas em diferentes bases de dados, compreendendo todo o período de existência das bases até 2019, chegando à análise final do estudo 11 artigos. Os resultados obtidos através da literatura demonstraram que o grupo deficiência intelectual apresentou α= 0,67-0,82 e o grupo deficiência física α= 0,64-0,85. Ademais, a prática de exercícios físicos apresenta correlação direta com o ACF e, identificaram-se seis instrumentos de avaliação do ACF em PCD, sendo dois validados. Conclui-se que a prática de exercícios físicos tem relação direta com o ACF e há escassez de instrumentos validados que avaliem o ACF de PCD.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2020-04-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e6013310.5007/2175-8042.2020e60133Motrivivência; v. 32 n. 61 (2020); 01-182175-80420103-4111reponame:Motrivivência (Florianópolis)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e60133/42936Copyright (c) 2020 Motrivivênciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVaz Junior, ArnaldoMouad, MarianaGrubertt, Guilherme AlvesSerassuelo Junior, Helio2020-04-22T11:37:55Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/60133Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/oai||giovani.pires@ufsc.br2175-80420103-4111opendoar:2020-04-22T11:37:55Motrivivência (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review
Autoconcepto físico en personas con discapacidad: una revisión sistemática
Avaliação do autoconceito físico em pessoas com deficiência: uma revisão sistemática
title Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review
spellingShingle Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review
Vaz Junior, Arnaldo
title_short Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review
title_full Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review
title_fullStr Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review
title_sort Physical self-concept in people with disabilities: a systematic review
author Vaz Junior, Arnaldo
author_facet Vaz Junior, Arnaldo
Mouad, Mariana
Grubertt, Guilherme Alves
Serassuelo Junior, Helio
author_role author
author2 Mouad, Mariana
Grubertt, Guilherme Alves
Serassuelo Junior, Helio
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vaz Junior, Arnaldo
Mouad, Mariana
Grubertt, Guilherme Alves
Serassuelo Junior, Helio
description The present study aims to systematically review about of physical self-concept (ACF) of people with disabilities (PCD) in adulthood and to identify instruments used to analyze this construct. As methodological procedures of the work, searches were carried out in different databases, covering the entire period of existence of the databases until September 2017. The process followed the PRISMA FlowDiagram recommendations and the articles were classified according to quality criteria adapted from the STROBE instrument. Nine articles reached the final analysis of the study. The results demonstrated six different instruments for analyzing the ACF of adult PCDs, with only two instruments being validated; two articles analyzed the PCA of intellectual PCD, two articles of motor PCD, three articles analyzed different deficiencies and two studies evaluated the ACF of people with and without disabilities. It is concluded that there is a shortage of instruments that assess the ACF of people with disabilities. 
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e60133
10.5007/2175-8042.2020e60133
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e60133
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-8042.2020e60133
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2020e60133/42936
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Motrivivência
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Motrivivência
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Motrivivência; v. 32 n. 61 (2020); 01-18
2175-8042
0103-4111
reponame:Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
collection Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Motrivivência (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||giovani.pires@ufsc.br
_version_ 1789434864345284608

Registros relacionados