The constitutional phylosophy of John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas: A debate about the relations between legal systems and rights systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lois, Cecília Caballero
Data de Publicação: 2005
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/15188
Resumo: This paper analyzes the debate between Rawls and Habermas, especially about the relationships that both establish between justice systems and rights systems. It begins presenting a possibility of concept of what it would be called as constitutional philosophy and which were its relationships with the rights theory and the constitutional one. Therefore, it presents John Rawls’s work and the critics that Jürgen Habermas formulates. Finally, it investigates which system would be more appropriate to make true the constitutional democracy in a society marked by pluralism.
id UFSC-3_0e3c97de7d7996bec0899f45be68d45b
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/15188
network_acronym_str UFSC-3
network_name_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The constitutional phylosophy of John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas: A debate about the relations between legal systems and rights systemsA filosofia constitucional de John Rawls e Jürgen Habermas: um debate sobre as relações entre sistemas de justiça e sistemas de direitosThis paper analyzes the debate between Rawls and Habermas, especially about the relationships that both establish between justice systems and rights systems. It begins presenting a possibility of concept of what it would be called as constitutional philosophy and which were its relationships with the rights theory and the constitutional one. Therefore, it presents John Rawls’s work and the critics that Jürgen Habermas formulates. Finally, it investigates which system would be more appropriate to make true the constitutional democracy in a society marked by pluralism.Este artigo analise o debate Rawls/Habermas, especialmente no que toca às relações que ambos estabelecem entre sistemas de justiça e sistemas de direitos. O trabalho inicia apresentando uma possibilidade de conceituação do que seria a chamada filosofia constitucional e qual as suas relações com a teoria dos direitos e a teoria constitucional. Logo após apresenta rapidamente a obra de John Rawls e as críticas que Jurgen Habermas lhe formula. Finalmente, investiga qual sistema seria mais adequado à concretização da democracia constitucional numa sociedade marcada pelo pluralismo.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2005-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/1518810.5007/%xSeqüência - Legal and Political Studies; V. 26 n. 50 (2005); 121-142Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 26 n. 50 (2005); 121-142Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 26 n. 50 (2005); 121-1422177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/15188/13813Lois, Cecília Caballeroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-21T14:15:55Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/15188Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:34:24.478915Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The constitutional phylosophy of John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas: A debate about the relations between legal systems and rights systems
A filosofia constitucional de John Rawls e Jürgen Habermas: um debate sobre as relações entre sistemas de justiça e sistemas de direitos
title The constitutional phylosophy of John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas: A debate about the relations between legal systems and rights systems
spellingShingle The constitutional phylosophy of John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas: A debate about the relations between legal systems and rights systems
Lois, Cecília Caballero
title_short The constitutional phylosophy of John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas: A debate about the relations between legal systems and rights systems
title_full The constitutional phylosophy of John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas: A debate about the relations between legal systems and rights systems
title_fullStr The constitutional phylosophy of John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas: A debate about the relations between legal systems and rights systems
title_full_unstemmed The constitutional phylosophy of John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas: A debate about the relations between legal systems and rights systems
title_sort The constitutional phylosophy of John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas: A debate about the relations between legal systems and rights systems
author Lois, Cecília Caballero
author_facet Lois, Cecília Caballero
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lois, Cecília Caballero
description This paper analyzes the debate between Rawls and Habermas, especially about the relationships that both establish between justice systems and rights systems. It begins presenting a possibility of concept of what it would be called as constitutional philosophy and which were its relationships with the rights theory and the constitutional one. Therefore, it presents John Rawls’s work and the critics that Jürgen Habermas formulates. Finally, it investigates which system would be more appropriate to make true the constitutional democracy in a society marked by pluralism.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/15188
10.5007/%x
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/15188
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/%x
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/15188/13813
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; V. 26 n. 50 (2005); 121-142
Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 26 n. 50 (2005); 121-142
Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 26 n. 50 (2005); 121-142
2177-7055
0101-9562
reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789434795901583360

Registros relacionados