The Same-sex Marriage in the U.S Supreme Court: un insight based on the dialogue between Honneth and Fraser

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
DOI: 10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n74p233
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n74p233
Resumo: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n74p233This work aims to assay the majority decision in the trial of the case Obergefell v. Hodges in light of the theoretical framework developed by Axel Honneth and Nancy Fraser and its impact on the interpretation and criticism of proactive attitudes of the judiciary. It is argued that the vote of Justice Kennedy includes a set of implicit discourse that not only establish the subordination status of homosexual unmarried couples – often so criticized by Fraser – but essentializes the gay identity. It uses the analytic induction method and the analysis of critical feminist discourse. Moreover, it also uses the indirect documentation.
id UFSC-3_1b41dfd49851c5fbacdf6e01b326a4cb
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/44248
network_acronym_str UFSC-3
network_name_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
spelling The Same-sex Marriage in the U.S Supreme Court: un insight based on the dialogue between Honneth and FraserO Casamento entre Pessoas do Mesmo Sexo na Suprema Corte Norte-Americana: uma reflexão baseada no diálogo entre Honneth-Fraserhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n74p233This work aims to assay the majority decision in the trial of the case Obergefell v. Hodges in light of the theoretical framework developed by Axel Honneth and Nancy Fraser and its impact on the interpretation and criticism of proactive attitudes of the judiciary. It is argued that the vote of Justice Kennedy includes a set of implicit discourse that not only establish the subordination status of homosexual unmarried couples – often so criticized by Fraser – but essentializes the gay identity. It uses the analytic induction method and the analysis of critical feminist discourse. Moreover, it also uses the indirect documentation.http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n74p233Este trabalho objetiva analisar a decisão majoritária no julgamento do caso Obergefell v. Hodges à luz dos referenciais teóricos desenvolvidos por Axel Honneth e Nancy Fraser e seus reflexos na interpretação e na crítica de posturas proativas do Poder Judiciário. Sustenta-se que o voto de Justice Kennedy contempla um conjunto de discursos implícitos que não apenas estabelecem a subordinação de status de casais homossexuais não casados - que é tão criticada por Fraser - mas essencializam a identidade gay. Utiliza-se o método de indução analítica e a análise crítica do discurso feminista. Outrossim, o trabalho também emprega a documentação indireta. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2016-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n74p23310.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n74p233Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 37 No. 74 (2016); 233-268Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 37 Núm. 74 (2016); 233-268Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 37 n. 74 (2016); 233-2682177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n74p233/33128Copyright (c) 2016 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBunchaft, Maria Eugenia2016-12-21T13:25:32Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/44248Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:35:01.076460Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Same-sex Marriage in the U.S Supreme Court: un insight based on the dialogue between Honneth and Fraser
O Casamento entre Pessoas do Mesmo Sexo na Suprema Corte Norte-Americana: uma reflexão baseada no diálogo entre Honneth-Fraser
title The Same-sex Marriage in the U.S Supreme Court: un insight based on the dialogue between Honneth and Fraser
spellingShingle The Same-sex Marriage in the U.S Supreme Court: un insight based on the dialogue between Honneth and Fraser
The Same-sex Marriage in the U.S Supreme Court: un insight based on the dialogue between Honneth and Fraser
Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
title_short The Same-sex Marriage in the U.S Supreme Court: un insight based on the dialogue between Honneth and Fraser
title_full The Same-sex Marriage in the U.S Supreme Court: un insight based on the dialogue between Honneth and Fraser
title_fullStr The Same-sex Marriage in the U.S Supreme Court: un insight based on the dialogue between Honneth and Fraser
The Same-sex Marriage in the U.S Supreme Court: un insight based on the dialogue between Honneth and Fraser
title_full_unstemmed The Same-sex Marriage in the U.S Supreme Court: un insight based on the dialogue between Honneth and Fraser
The Same-sex Marriage in the U.S Supreme Court: un insight based on the dialogue between Honneth and Fraser
title_sort The Same-sex Marriage in the U.S Supreme Court: un insight based on the dialogue between Honneth and Fraser
author Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
author_facet Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bunchaft, Maria Eugenia
description http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n74p233This work aims to assay the majority decision in the trial of the case Obergefell v. Hodges in light of the theoretical framework developed by Axel Honneth and Nancy Fraser and its impact on the interpretation and criticism of proactive attitudes of the judiciary. It is argued that the vote of Justice Kennedy includes a set of implicit discourse that not only establish the subordination status of homosexual unmarried couples – often so criticized by Fraser – but essentializes the gay identity. It uses the analytic induction method and the analysis of critical feminist discourse. Moreover, it also uses the indirect documentation.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n74p233
10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n74p233
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n74p233
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n74p233
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n74p233/33128
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 37 No. 74 (2016); 233-268
Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 37 Núm. 74 (2016); 233-268
Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 37 n. 74 (2016); 233-268
2177-7055
0101-9562
reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br
_version_ 1822181416394293248
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n74p233

Registros relacionados