Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Marcia Carla Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Czelusniak, Vivian Amaro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
DOI: 10.5007/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189
Resumo: The goal of this study is to review the themes of constitutionalism and democracy from procedural and substantial views, making a contrast between Dworkin and Ely. The methodology used was the literature review. Inside of this work, it is presented a brief history of constitutionalism, the concept of judicial review, Dworkin’s substantialist view, and Ely’s procedural view. At the end of this work, it is made a contrast between proceduralist and substantialist theories, discussing constitutionalism in Brazil. As a conclusion, it was observed that the contemporary constitutionalism has challenges and both proceduralist and substantialist theories bring contributions to obtain a possible answer to the difficulties encountered in the debate between constitutionalism and democracy.
id UFSC-3_2d7b46a2d9d49ec87f4ac994871d678e
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/25535
network_acronym_str UFSC-3
network_name_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
spelling Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s ViewsConstitucionalismo e Democracia nas Análises Procedimentalista e SubstancialistaThe goal of this study is to review the themes of constitutionalism and democracy from procedural and substantial views, making a contrast between Dworkin and Ely. The methodology used was the literature review. Inside of this work, it is presented a brief history of constitutionalism, the concept of judicial review, Dworkin’s substantialist view, and Ely’s procedural view. At the end of this work, it is made a contrast between proceduralist and substantialist theories, discussing constitutionalism in Brazil. As a conclusion, it was observed that the contemporary constitutionalism has challenges and both proceduralist and substantialist theories bring contributions to obtain a possible answer to the difficulties encountered in the debate between constitutionalism and democracy.http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189O  objetivo deste trabalho é discorrer sobre os temas do constitucionalismo e da democracia a partir das análises procedimentalista e substancialista, fazendo um contraste entre as visões de Dworkin e Ely. A metodologia utilizada foi a revisão bibliográfica. No decorrer do trabalho apresentou-se um breve histórico do constitucionalismo, a conceituação da revisão judicial (judicial review), a visão de Dworkin, como exemplo da corrente substancialista, e o procedimentalismo na visão de Ely. Ao final fez--se um contraste entre as teorias procedimentalista e substancialista, levantando a situação do constitucionalismo no Brasil. Como conclusão, observou-se que o constitucionalismo contemporâneo encontra desafios e que tanto a teoria procedimentalista como a substancialista trazem contribuições para se obter uma possível resposta às dificuldades encontradas no debate entre o constitucionalismo e a democracia.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2012-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2012v33n65p18910.5007/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; V. 33 n. 65 (2012); 189-207Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 33 n. 65 (2012); 189-207Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 33 n. 65 (2012); 189-2072177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189/23705Ribeiro, Marcia Carla PereiraCzelusniak, Vivian Amaroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-21T14:16:09Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/25535Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:34:55.770613Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
Constitucionalismo e Democracia nas Análises Procedimentalista e Substancialista
title Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
spellingShingle Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
Ribeiro, Marcia Carla Pereira
Ribeiro, Marcia Carla Pereira
title_short Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
title_full Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
title_fullStr Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
title_full_unstemmed Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
title_sort Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
author Ribeiro, Marcia Carla Pereira
author_facet Ribeiro, Marcia Carla Pereira
Ribeiro, Marcia Carla Pereira
Czelusniak, Vivian Amaro
Czelusniak, Vivian Amaro
author_role author
author2 Czelusniak, Vivian Amaro
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Marcia Carla Pereira
Czelusniak, Vivian Amaro
description The goal of this study is to review the themes of constitutionalism and democracy from procedural and substantial views, making a contrast between Dworkin and Ely. The methodology used was the literature review. Inside of this work, it is presented a brief history of constitutionalism, the concept of judicial review, Dworkin’s substantialist view, and Ely’s procedural view. At the end of this work, it is made a contrast between proceduralist and substantialist theories, discussing constitutionalism in Brazil. As a conclusion, it was observed that the contemporary constitutionalism has challenges and both proceduralist and substantialist theories bring contributions to obtain a possible answer to the difficulties encountered in the debate between constitutionalism and democracy.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-12-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189
10.5007/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189/23705
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; V. 33 n. 65 (2012); 189-207
Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 33 n. 65 (2012); 189-207
Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 33 n. 65 (2012); 189-207
2177-7055
0101-9562
reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br
_version_ 1822181416298872832
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.5007/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189