Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Marcia Carla Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Czelusniak, Vivian Amaro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189
Resumo: The goal of this study is to review the themes of constitutionalism and democracy from procedural and substantial views, making a contrast between Dworkin and Ely. The methodology used was the literature review. Inside of this work, it is presented a brief history of constitutionalism, the concept of judicial review, Dworkin’s substantialist view, and Ely’s procedural view. At the end of this work, it is made a contrast between proceduralist and substantialist theories, discussing constitutionalism in Brazil. As a conclusion, it was observed that the contemporary constitutionalism has challenges and both proceduralist and substantialist theories bring contributions to obtain a possible answer to the difficulties encountered in the debate between constitutionalism and democracy.
id UFSC-3_2d7b46a2d9d49ec87f4ac994871d678e
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/25535
network_acronym_str UFSC-3
network_name_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s ViewsConstitucionalismo e Democracia nas Análises Procedimentalista e SubstancialistaThe goal of this study is to review the themes of constitutionalism and democracy from procedural and substantial views, making a contrast between Dworkin and Ely. The methodology used was the literature review. Inside of this work, it is presented a brief history of constitutionalism, the concept of judicial review, Dworkin’s substantialist view, and Ely’s procedural view. At the end of this work, it is made a contrast between proceduralist and substantialist theories, discussing constitutionalism in Brazil. As a conclusion, it was observed that the contemporary constitutionalism has challenges and both proceduralist and substantialist theories bring contributions to obtain a possible answer to the difficulties encountered in the debate between constitutionalism and democracy.http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189O  objetivo deste trabalho é discorrer sobre os temas do constitucionalismo e da democracia a partir das análises procedimentalista e substancialista, fazendo um contraste entre as visões de Dworkin e Ely. A metodologia utilizada foi a revisão bibliográfica. No decorrer do trabalho apresentou-se um breve histórico do constitucionalismo, a conceituação da revisão judicial (judicial review), a visão de Dworkin, como exemplo da corrente substancialista, e o procedimentalismo na visão de Ely. Ao final fez--se um contraste entre as teorias procedimentalista e substancialista, levantando a situação do constitucionalismo no Brasil. Como conclusão, observou-se que o constitucionalismo contemporâneo encontra desafios e que tanto a teoria procedimentalista como a substancialista trazem contribuições para se obter uma possível resposta às dificuldades encontradas no debate entre o constitucionalismo e a democracia.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2012-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2012v33n65p18910.5007/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; V. 33 n. 65 (2012); 189-207Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 33 n. 65 (2012); 189-207Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 33 n. 65 (2012); 189-2072177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189/23705Ribeiro, Marcia Carla PereiraCzelusniak, Vivian Amaroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-21T14:16:09Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/25535Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:34:55.770613Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
Constitucionalismo e Democracia nas Análises Procedimentalista e Substancialista
title Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
spellingShingle Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
Ribeiro, Marcia Carla Pereira
title_short Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
title_full Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
title_fullStr Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
title_full_unstemmed Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
title_sort Constitutionalism and Democracy from Procedural’s and Substantial’s Views
author Ribeiro, Marcia Carla Pereira
author_facet Ribeiro, Marcia Carla Pereira
Czelusniak, Vivian Amaro
author_role author
author2 Czelusniak, Vivian Amaro
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Marcia Carla Pereira
Czelusniak, Vivian Amaro
description The goal of this study is to review the themes of constitutionalism and democracy from procedural and substantial views, making a contrast between Dworkin and Ely. The methodology used was the literature review. Inside of this work, it is presented a brief history of constitutionalism, the concept of judicial review, Dworkin’s substantialist view, and Ely’s procedural view. At the end of this work, it is made a contrast between proceduralist and substantialist theories, discussing constitutionalism in Brazil. As a conclusion, it was observed that the contemporary constitutionalism has challenges and both proceduralist and substantialist theories bring contributions to obtain a possible answer to the difficulties encountered in the debate between constitutionalism and democracy.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-12-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189
10.5007/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2012v33n65p189/23705
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; V. 33 n. 65 (2012); 189-207
Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 33 n. 65 (2012); 189-207
Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 33 n. 65 (2012); 189-207
2177-7055
0101-9562
reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789434801999052800