Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kozicki, Katya
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Barboza, Estefânia Maria de Queiroz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151
Resumo: This article intends to discuss Brazilian judicial review from the standpoint of deliberative (or procedural) democracy and constitutionalism. It focuses first on the relation between procedural democracy and judicial review stressing the role of the latter in defining and protecting basic rights in order to guarantee the democratic procedure. Second it takes constitutionalism as a theory that emphasizes the protection of basic rights even if it limits the democratic procedure. Then, it shows that the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 has adopted a conception of substantialdemocracy that leads to the limitation of executive and legislative powers by the judiciary through judicial review in order to protect basic rights.
id UFSC-3_4cffbc6a687d018516518278749024f4
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/14994
network_acronym_str UFSC-3
network_name_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracyJurisdição Constitucional brasileira: entre Constitucionalismo e DemocraciaThis article intends to discuss Brazilian judicial review from the standpoint of deliberative (or procedural) democracy and constitutionalism. It focuses first on the relation between procedural democracy and judicial review stressing the role of the latter in defining and protecting basic rights in order to guarantee the democratic procedure. Second it takes constitutionalism as a theory that emphasizes the protection of basic rights even if it limits the democratic procedure. Then, it shows that the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 has adopted a conception of substantialdemocracy that leads to the limitation of executive and legislative powers by the judiciary through judicial review in order to protect basic rights.http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151O presente artigo analisa o papel da Jurisdição Constitucional brasileira a partir das teorias da Democracia Procedimental e do Constitucionalismo. Primeiramente estuda-se a maneira como os teóricos da Democracia Procedimental tratam a possibilidade de atuação da Jurisdição Constitucional na proteção e definição dos direitos fundamentais para a garantia do processo democrático. Em um segundo momento enfoca-se o Constitucionalismo como teoria que prioriza a proteção dos direitos fundamentais, mesmo que isto implique limitação do processo democrático. Por fim demonstra-se que a Constituição brasileira de 1988 adotou uma concepção de democracia substantiva, o que leva à possibilidade da Jurisdição Constitucional limitar os Poderes Executivo e Legislativo visando a proteção dos direitos fundamentais.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2010-09-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2008v29n56p15110.5007/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; V. 29 n. 56 (2008); 151-176Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 29 n. 56 (2008); 151-176Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 29 n. 56 (2008); 151-1762177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151/13675Kozicki, KatyaBarboza, Estefânia Maria de Queirozinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-21T14:15:54Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/14994Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:34:21.225872Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy
Jurisdição Constitucional brasileira: entre Constitucionalismo e Democracia
title Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy
spellingShingle Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy
Kozicki, Katya
title_short Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy
title_full Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy
title_fullStr Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy
title_full_unstemmed Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy
title_sort Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy
author Kozicki, Katya
author_facet Kozicki, Katya
Barboza, Estefânia Maria de Queiroz
author_role author
author2 Barboza, Estefânia Maria de Queiroz
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kozicki, Katya
Barboza, Estefânia Maria de Queiroz
description This article intends to discuss Brazilian judicial review from the standpoint of deliberative (or procedural) democracy and constitutionalism. It focuses first on the relation between procedural democracy and judicial review stressing the role of the latter in defining and protecting basic rights in order to guarantee the democratic procedure. Second it takes constitutionalism as a theory that emphasizes the protection of basic rights even if it limits the democratic procedure. Then, it shows that the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 has adopted a conception of substantialdemocracy that leads to the limitation of executive and legislative powers by the judiciary through judicial review in order to protect basic rights.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-09-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151
10.5007/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151/13675
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; V. 29 n. 56 (2008); 151-176
Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 29 n. 56 (2008); 151-176
Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 29 n. 56 (2008); 151-176
2177-7055
0101-9562
reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789434794931650560

Registros relacionados