Minority Rights Interpreted: The democratic commitment of Brazilian Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319 |
Resumo: | The category of minority is used as argumentative reinforcement in Law for the defense of fundamental rights. It is destined to groups that were historically marginalized, and claim for public recognition of their peculiarities and the protection of rights. This category, which appeared linked to the idea of state sovereignty and nationality, now is extended to demands ignored before. The interpretation of principles related to the minority category must therefore be conceived as a need for consolidation of constitutional democratic values. This study aims to identify how the minority category is articulated in decisions of the judiciary. The source of precedents on which research is developed are those decisions of all instances of the Brazilian courts, tried and published since October 5, 1988 until July 31, 2010. The conclusion is that the use of minority category by the judges pursues the democratic ideal of law enforcement to those belonging to minority groups. |
id |
UFSC-3_3c33d545612be5c60c84b071bae82589 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/18035 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-3 |
network_name_str |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Minority Rights Interpreted: The democratic commitment of Brazilian Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319Direito das Minorias Interpretado: o compromisso democrático do direito brasileiro doi: 10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319The category of minority is used as argumentative reinforcement in Law for the defense of fundamental rights. It is destined to groups that were historically marginalized, and claim for public recognition of their peculiarities and the protection of rights. This category, which appeared linked to the idea of state sovereignty and nationality, now is extended to demands ignored before. The interpretation of principles related to the minority category must therefore be conceived as a need for consolidation of constitutional democratic values. This study aims to identify how the minority category is articulated in decisions of the judiciary. The source of precedents on which research is developed are those decisions of all instances of the Brazilian courts, tried and published since October 5, 1988 until July 31, 2010. The conclusion is that the use of minority category by the judges pursues the democratic ideal of law enforcement to those belonging to minority groups.A categoria minoria é utilizada no Direito como reforço argumentativo para a defesa de direitos fundamentais. Destina-se a grupos que, historicamente marginalizados, reivindicam no espaço público o reconhecimento de suas peculiaridades e a proteção de direitos. Essa categoria, que surgiu atrelada à ideia de Estado, nacionalidades e soberania, hoje se estende a demandas antes ignoradas. A interpretação dos princípios relacionados à categoria minoria deve, portanto, concebê-la como uma necessidade de consolidação dos valores democráticos da Constituição. O presente trabalho busca identificar como a categoria minoria é articulada nas decisões do Poder Judiciário. A fonte de precedentes em que se baseia a pesquisa são as decisões exaradas por todas as instâncias da Justiça brasileira, julgados e publicados desde 5 de outubro de 1988 até 31 de julho de 2010. Conclui-se que o emprego da categoria minoria pelos magistrados persegue o ideal democrático de aplicação do direito àqueles pertencentes a grupos minoritários.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2011-12-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2011v32n63p31910.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; V. 32 n. 63 (2011); 319-352Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 32 n. 63 (2011); 319-352Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 32 n. 63 (2011); 319-3522177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319/21068Martins, Argemiro Cardoso MoreiraMizutani, Larissainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-21T14:16:08Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/18035Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:34:53.537529Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Minority Rights Interpreted: The democratic commitment of Brazilian Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319 Direito das Minorias Interpretado: o compromisso democrático do direito brasileiro doi: 10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319 |
title |
Minority Rights Interpreted: The democratic commitment of Brazilian Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319 |
spellingShingle |
Minority Rights Interpreted: The democratic commitment of Brazilian Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319 Martins, Argemiro Cardoso Moreira |
title_short |
Minority Rights Interpreted: The democratic commitment of Brazilian Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319 |
title_full |
Minority Rights Interpreted: The democratic commitment of Brazilian Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319 |
title_fullStr |
Minority Rights Interpreted: The democratic commitment of Brazilian Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Minority Rights Interpreted: The democratic commitment of Brazilian Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319 |
title_sort |
Minority Rights Interpreted: The democratic commitment of Brazilian Law doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319 |
author |
Martins, Argemiro Cardoso Moreira |
author_facet |
Martins, Argemiro Cardoso Moreira Mizutani, Larissa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mizutani, Larissa |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martins, Argemiro Cardoso Moreira Mizutani, Larissa |
description |
The category of minority is used as argumentative reinforcement in Law for the defense of fundamental rights. It is destined to groups that were historically marginalized, and claim for public recognition of their peculiarities and the protection of rights. This category, which appeared linked to the idea of state sovereignty and nationality, now is extended to demands ignored before. The interpretation of principles related to the minority category must therefore be conceived as a need for consolidation of constitutional democratic values. This study aims to identify how the minority category is articulated in decisions of the judiciary. The source of precedents on which research is developed are those decisions of all instances of the Brazilian courts, tried and published since October 5, 1988 until July 31, 2010. The conclusion is that the use of minority category by the judges pursues the democratic ideal of law enforcement to those belonging to minority groups. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-12-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319 10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319/21068 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; V. 32 n. 63 (2011); 319-352 Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 32 n. 63 (2011); 319-352 Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 32 n. 63 (2011); 319-352 2177-7055 0101-9562 reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789434801170677760 |