Accountability of public agents and administrative improbity: a troubled history
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/86720 |
Resumo: | In this study, we intend to propose some theses on the accountability of public agents based on the assumption of a sociological theory of administrative improbity. The Brazilian reality shows that the disciplinary right was appropriated by the parallel Administration. There is an implicit conformation in the Constitutional Text that cannot be disregarded by the Legislator: the essential core of improbity refers to dishonesty. Law 8,249/92, in its literalness, by admitting culpable improbity, violated the Constitution. In spite of this, the filing of improbity suits by the Public Prosecutor's Office was not, for the most part, to serve the interests of the parallel Administration. These interests, however, presided over the changes made by Law 14,230/21. In one point they were positive: they prevented the misrepresentation of liability for improbity without the agent being dishonest. On one point they were negative: they prevented jurisdictional accountability for guilt. This point requires re-reading the theme: the culpable action of agents, if not punished within a reasonable period of time in the administrative sphere, can be judicially punished in popular action and public civil action. |
id |
UFSC-3_9aefa342e04ddab0a2ea8dd8ab3f2a0d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/86720 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-3 |
network_name_str |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Accountability of public agents and administrative improbity: a troubled historyResponsabilização de agentes públicos e improbidade administrativa: uma história conturbadaAdministrative improbityDishonesty of public agentParallel Administration Culpable performancePublic civil actionPopular actionImprobidade administrativaDesonestidade do agente públicoAdministração paralelaAtuação culposaAção civil públicaAção popularIn this study, we intend to propose some theses on the accountability of public agents based on the assumption of a sociological theory of administrative improbity. The Brazilian reality shows that the disciplinary right was appropriated by the parallel Administration. There is an implicit conformation in the Constitutional Text that cannot be disregarded by the Legislator: the essential core of improbity refers to dishonesty. Law 8,249/92, in its literalness, by admitting culpable improbity, violated the Constitution. In spite of this, the filing of improbity suits by the Public Prosecutor's Office was not, for the most part, to serve the interests of the parallel Administration. These interests, however, presided over the changes made by Law 14,230/21. In one point they were positive: they prevented the misrepresentation of liability for improbity without the agent being dishonest. On one point they were negative: they prevented jurisdictional accountability for guilt. This point requires re-reading the theme: the culpable action of agents, if not punished within a reasonable period of time in the administrative sphere, can be judicially punished in popular action and public civil action.Pretendeu-se neste estudo propor algumas teses sobre a responsabilização dos agentes públicos tendo por pressuposto uma teoria sociológica da improbidade administrativa. A realidade brasileira evidencia que o direito disciplinar foi apropriado pela Administração paralela. Há uma conformação implícita no Texto constitucional, que não pode ser desprezada pelo Legislador: o núcleo essencial da improbidade refere-se à desonestidade. A Lei 8.249/92, na sua literalidade, ao admitir a improbidade culposa, atentava contra a Constituição. Apesar disso, o ajuizamento das ações de improbidade pelo Ministério Público não se deu, majoritariamente, para atender os interesses da Administração paralela. Esses interesses, porém, presidiram as alterações efetuadas pela Lei 14.230/21. Em um ponto foram positivos: impediram a deturpada responsabilização por improbidade sem que haja desonestidade do agente. Em um ponto foram negativos: impediram a responsabilização jurisdicional por culpa. Esse ponto impõe a releitura do tema: a atuação culposa dos agentes, se não punida em prazo razoável na esfera administrativa, pode ser punida judicialmente em sede de ação popular e de ação civil pública. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2022-07-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/8672010.5007/2177-7055.2022.e86720Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 43 No. 90 (2022): Seqüência - Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos ; 1-28Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 43 Núm. 90 (2022): Seqüência - Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos ; 1-28Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 43 n. 90 (2022): Seqüência - Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos ; 1-282177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/86720/51209Copyright (c) 2022 Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartins, Ricardo Marcondes2022-07-04T19:25:04Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/86720Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:35:09.883261Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Accountability of public agents and administrative improbity: a troubled history Responsabilização de agentes públicos e improbidade administrativa: uma história conturbada |
title |
Accountability of public agents and administrative improbity: a troubled history |
spellingShingle |
Accountability of public agents and administrative improbity: a troubled history Martins, Ricardo Marcondes Administrative improbity Dishonesty of public agent Parallel Administration Culpable performance Public civil action Popular action Improbidade administrativa Desonestidade do agente público Administração paralela Atuação culposa Ação civil pública Ação popular |
title_short |
Accountability of public agents and administrative improbity: a troubled history |
title_full |
Accountability of public agents and administrative improbity: a troubled history |
title_fullStr |
Accountability of public agents and administrative improbity: a troubled history |
title_full_unstemmed |
Accountability of public agents and administrative improbity: a troubled history |
title_sort |
Accountability of public agents and administrative improbity: a troubled history |
author |
Martins, Ricardo Marcondes |
author_facet |
Martins, Ricardo Marcondes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martins, Ricardo Marcondes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Administrative improbity Dishonesty of public agent Parallel Administration Culpable performance Public civil action Popular action Improbidade administrativa Desonestidade do agente público Administração paralela Atuação culposa Ação civil pública Ação popular |
topic |
Administrative improbity Dishonesty of public agent Parallel Administration Culpable performance Public civil action Popular action Improbidade administrativa Desonestidade do agente público Administração paralela Atuação culposa Ação civil pública Ação popular |
description |
In this study, we intend to propose some theses on the accountability of public agents based on the assumption of a sociological theory of administrative improbity. The Brazilian reality shows that the disciplinary right was appropriated by the parallel Administration. There is an implicit conformation in the Constitutional Text that cannot be disregarded by the Legislator: the essential core of improbity refers to dishonesty. Law 8,249/92, in its literalness, by admitting culpable improbity, violated the Constitution. In spite of this, the filing of improbity suits by the Public Prosecutor's Office was not, for the most part, to serve the interests of the parallel Administration. These interests, however, presided over the changes made by Law 14,230/21. In one point they were positive: they prevented the misrepresentation of liability for improbity without the agent being dishonest. On one point they were negative: they prevented jurisdictional accountability for guilt. This point requires re-reading the theme: the culpable action of agents, if not punished within a reasonable period of time in the administrative sphere, can be judicially punished in popular action and public civil action. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/86720 10.5007/2177-7055.2022.e86720 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/86720 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2177-7055.2022.e86720 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/86720/51209 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 43 No. 90 (2022): Seqüência - Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos ; 1-28 Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 43 Núm. 90 (2022): Seqüência - Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos ; 1-28 Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 43 n. 90 (2022): Seqüência - Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos ; 1-28 2177-7055 0101-9562 reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789434804121370624 |