Reassessing dual Responsibility for International Crimes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n73p19 |
Resumo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n73p19The recent decision of the International Court of Justice in the case between Croatia and Serbia provides us with the opportunity to reassess the relationship between state and individual responsibility for international crimes. Although limited to the commission of acts of genocide, the judgment shows that the conceptual framework explaining such relationship is now well settled. However, the Court seems to reach solutions that at times are not entirely consistent with the premises of such conceptual scheme. The purpose of the following analysis is to test the general theoretical approach with respect to a number of issues dealt with by the Court in its recent decision. |
id |
UFSC-3_f98c1de6db38f902fed81ec181797f96 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/45591 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-3 |
network_name_str |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reassessing dual Responsibility for International CrimesReavaliando a Dupla Responsabilidade por Crimes Internacionaishttp://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n73p19The recent decision of the International Court of Justice in the case between Croatia and Serbia provides us with the opportunity to reassess the relationship between state and individual responsibility for international crimes. Although limited to the commission of acts of genocide, the judgment shows that the conceptual framework explaining such relationship is now well settled. However, the Court seems to reach solutions that at times are not entirely consistent with the premises of such conceptual scheme. The purpose of the following analysis is to test the general theoretical approach with respect to a number of issues dealt with by the Court in its recent decision.http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n73p19A recente decisão da Corte Internacional de Justiça no caso entre Croácia e Sérvia nos oferece a oportunidade de reavaliar a relação entre responsabilidade individual e estatal por crimes internacionais. Embora limitada ao cometimento de atos de genocídio, a sentença demonstra que o quadro conceitual explicando tal relação é ora bem definido. Contudo, a Corteparece chegar a conclusões que por vezes não são completamente consistentes com as premissas de tal quadro conceitual. O objetivo da análise é testar a abordagem teórica geral em relação a alguns problemas lidados pela Corte em sua recente decisão.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2016-08-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n73p1910.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n73p19Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 37 No. 73 (2016); 19-36Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 37 Núm. 73 (2016); 19-36Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 37 n. 73 (2016); 19-362177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n73p19/32224Copyright (c) 2016 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBonafè, Beatrice I.2016-08-21T12:46:32Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/45591Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:35:01.396385Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reassessing dual Responsibility for International Crimes Reavaliando a Dupla Responsabilidade por Crimes Internacionais |
title |
Reassessing dual Responsibility for International Crimes |
spellingShingle |
Reassessing dual Responsibility for International Crimes Bonafè, Beatrice I. |
title_short |
Reassessing dual Responsibility for International Crimes |
title_full |
Reassessing dual Responsibility for International Crimes |
title_fullStr |
Reassessing dual Responsibility for International Crimes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reassessing dual Responsibility for International Crimes |
title_sort |
Reassessing dual Responsibility for International Crimes |
author |
Bonafè, Beatrice I. |
author_facet |
Bonafè, Beatrice I. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bonafè, Beatrice I. |
description |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n73p19The recent decision of the International Court of Justice in the case between Croatia and Serbia provides us with the opportunity to reassess the relationship between state and individual responsibility for international crimes. Although limited to the commission of acts of genocide, the judgment shows that the conceptual framework explaining such relationship is now well settled. However, the Court seems to reach solutions that at times are not entirely consistent with the premises of such conceptual scheme. The purpose of the following analysis is to test the general theoretical approach with respect to a number of issues dealt with by the Court in its recent decision. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n73p19 10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n73p19 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n73p19 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n73p19 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n73p19/32224 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 37 No. 73 (2016); 19-36 Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 37 Núm. 73 (2016); 19-36 Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 37 n. 73 (2016); 19-36 2177-7055 0101-9562 reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789434802921799680 |