Disputas sociológicas e seus recursos intelectuais

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nogueira, Bruno Santos
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2014v18n3p371
Resumo: This essay aims to picture pieces of contemporary sociological debates, concerning epistemological issues. A dichotomy between term and concept will be developed to clarify the ideas that will relate a celebrated author — Pierre Bourdieu — with two more recent names — John Law and Bruno Latour — that presented new long range theories, in which one can immerse to account a very unorthodox sociology. In the source of this dichotomy there is a modernist epistemology that will be roughly (re)elaborated before the account of the other subjects. It will be suggested that the non-observation of some epistemological details follows some critiques in the debates, as well as the debate itself, fueling the plausibility of the concerning authors’ sociological theories.
id UFSC-5_00533d700ad4d73c954dd41967f20aee
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/32356
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Disputas sociológicas e seus recursos intelectuaisDisputas sociológicas e seus recursos intelectuaisThis essay aims to picture pieces of contemporary sociological debates, concerning epistemological issues. A dichotomy between term and concept will be developed to clarify the ideas that will relate a celebrated author — Pierre Bourdieu — with two more recent names — John Law and Bruno Latour — that presented new long range theories, in which one can immerse to account a very unorthodox sociology. In the source of this dichotomy there is a modernist epistemology that will be roughly (re)elaborated before the account of the other subjects. It will be suggested that the non-observation of some epistemological details follows some critiques in the debates, as well as the debate itself, fueling the plausibility of the concerning authors’ sociological theories.A proposta do ensaio é ilustrar segmentos de debates contemporâneos em sociologia, no que concerne questões epistemológicas. Uma dicotomia termo x conceito será fomentada para dar vazão às ideias, relacionando um autor já consagrado — Pierre Bourdieu — com dois nomes mais recentes — John Law e Bruno Latour — que apresentaram novas teorias de longo alcance, constitutivas de uma sociologia bastante heterodoxa. Na fonte dessa dicotomia está uma epistemologia modernista, que será grosseiramente (re)elaborada antes dos outros temas serem aprofundados. Será argumentado que a não observação de alguns detalhes epistemológicos acompanha algumas críticas presentes nos debates, bem como os próprios debates, e também é combustível para alimentar a plausibilidade das teorias sociológicas dos autores analisados.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2014-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2014v18n3p37110.5007/1808-1711.2014v18n3p371Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 18 No. 3 (2014); 371-391Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 18 Núm. 3 (2014); 371-391Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 18 n. 3 (2014); 371-3911808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2014v18n3p371/29900Copyright (c) 2021 Bruno Santos Nogueirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNogueira, Bruno Santos2019-09-13T10:16:13Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/32356Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2019-09-13T10:16:13Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Disputas sociológicas e seus recursos intelectuais
Disputas sociológicas e seus recursos intelectuais
title Disputas sociológicas e seus recursos intelectuais
spellingShingle Disputas sociológicas e seus recursos intelectuais
Nogueira, Bruno Santos
title_short Disputas sociológicas e seus recursos intelectuais
title_full Disputas sociológicas e seus recursos intelectuais
title_fullStr Disputas sociológicas e seus recursos intelectuais
title_full_unstemmed Disputas sociológicas e seus recursos intelectuais
title_sort Disputas sociológicas e seus recursos intelectuais
author Nogueira, Bruno Santos
author_facet Nogueira, Bruno Santos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nogueira, Bruno Santos
description This essay aims to picture pieces of contemporary sociological debates, concerning epistemological issues. A dichotomy between term and concept will be developed to clarify the ideas that will relate a celebrated author — Pierre Bourdieu — with two more recent names — John Law and Bruno Latour — that presented new long range theories, in which one can immerse to account a very unorthodox sociology. In the source of this dichotomy there is a modernist epistemology that will be roughly (re)elaborated before the account of the other subjects. It will be suggested that the non-observation of some epistemological details follows some critiques in the debates, as well as the debate itself, fueling the plausibility of the concerning authors’ sociological theories.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2014v18n3p371
10.5007/1808-1711.2014v18n3p371
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2014v18n3p371
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1808-1711.2014v18n3p371
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2014v18n3p371/29900
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Bruno Santos Nogueira
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Bruno Santos Nogueira
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 18 No. 3 (2014); 371-391
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 18 Núm. 3 (2014); 371-391
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 18 n. 3 (2014); 371-391
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435107587653632

Registros relacionados